If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
"I believe in good Financial Management!! I do not beieve in enriching
rich jerks!" Must not be making much money these days then! -- Milly Staples [MVP - Outlook] Post all replies to the group to keep the discussion intact. Due to the (insert latest virus name here) virus, all mail sent to my personal account will be deleted without reading. After searching google.groups.com and finding no answer, John.Doe asked: |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Is USA on vacation?
I wonder if USA is on vacation. I do not appear to have received my quota of spam messages in the last 48 hours. Have all spammers gone on strike?
-- I use non Microsoft products where ever possible which requires no activation. I buy WordPerfect Office for less than $50 from Amazon: http://tinyurl.com/5nscw I use Netscape 7.2 as my defalt browser which has everything I need for my work. I believe in good Financial Management!! I do not beieve in enriching rich jerks! |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
This silly tart wrote: "Must not be making much money these days then!" Yes I don't. Nobody makes as much as your pimp; are you willing to work for me?. Did you know that there are only 6,000 girls working on London Streets servicing about 12m people. So there will always be demand for sex as long as there are virile men around (no such gurantee for Microsoft products). I can only recommend you to continue serving your master so that he can achieve that top spot. The days of chivalry are over; Microsoft rules the world.! They hav tart like you working for nothing! "Milly Staples [MVP - Outlook]" wrote: "I believe in good Financial Management!! I do not beieve in enriching rich jerks!" Must not be making much money these days then! -- Milly Staples [MVP - Outlook] -- I use non Microsoft products where ever possible which requires no activation. I use Netscape 7.2 as my defalt browser which has everything I need for my work. I believe in good Financial Management!! I do not believe in enriching rich jerks! |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Thank you for that note - it made my day.
It never ceases to amaze me how much vitriol people reserve for an inanimate object such as a corporation nor how low they will stoop to insult a perfect stranger. My response to you was a humorous one - yours was pure, unadulterated insults. I hope you have a nice day and bask in the glow you must feel from childish name calling. I am very happy you are NOT an acquaintance. -- Milly Staples [MVP - Outlook] Post all replies to the group to keep the discussion intact. Due to the (insert latest virus name here) virus, all mail sent to my personal account will be deleted without reading. After searching google.groups.com and finding no answer, John.Doe asked: | This silly tart wrote: "Must not be making much money these days | then!" | | Yes I don't. Nobody makes as much as your pimp; are you willing to | work for me?. Did you know that there are only 6,000 girls working | on London Streets servicing about 12m people. So there will always | be demand for sex as long as there are virile men around (no such | gurantee for Microsoft products). I can only recommend you to | continue serving your master so that he can achieve that top spot. | | The days of chivalry are over; Microsoft rules the world.! They hav | tart like you working for nothing! | | | "Milly Staples [MVP - Outlook]" wrote: | || "I believe in good Financial Management!! I do not beieve in || enriching || rich jerks!" || || Must not be making much money these days then! || || -- || Milly Staples [MVP - Outlook] |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
"Milly Staples [MVP - Outlook]" wrote in message ... Thank you for that note - it made my day. It never ceases to amaze me how much vitriol people reserve for an inanimate object such as a corporation nor how low they will stoop to insult a perfect stranger. My response to you was a humorous one - yours was pure, unadulterated insults. All your response did was enable a dysfunctional game for two to play. Your response was humorous? Well, it went over like a lead balloon, like deciding to pat an angrily barking dog on the head has a reasonable chance of pacifying the dog rather than getting your hand bitten. Your response baited him as could well be expected and now you want to pretend to be the victim. And I am quite surprised that the corporate Microsoft entity which is composed of human beings making judgments failed to produce guidelines about ignoring John.Doe posts instead of fueling the fire with your supposedly "humorous" gibe. This is not the first time I've seen you choose to defend the faith against troll attacks. It is considered codependent to engage in such behavior. Your response was either a lie or you are far out of touch with reality. It annoyed me to see you claim your subtle retaliation was justified and "above" his tactics. You poked him to see him squeal. Since when does a corporate entity not follow instructions made by human authority which have moral/living consequences for an entire culture? You attempted to represent MS as an "inanimate object" which is not responsible for its decisions, and that John.Doe was directing his animosity towards such an inanimate object, when in fact he wrote: "I do not beieve in enriching rich jerks!" which is a personal perspective. I might condemn the Alcohol Industry for promoting alcohol to teenagers which led to Mothers Against Drunk Driving just because I may not know the names of the individuals involved who decided to target their advertising. I may also want to condemn the Tobacco Industry for tempting people to smoke when the directors knew that it would cause cancer. Because corporations enclose those industries does not make the corporation innocent because it does not have a personal identity since its polices are determined by humans who have faces and names. So there is nothing wrong with using a corporation name as a shortcut to meaning the people who are responsible, though I may not know their names. Your post twisted this legitimate choice. John.Doe certainly appears to be a woman hater. I see nothing wrong with your rejecting such a view. But his view and your response to it don't belong on this forum. As an MVP, you are not above setting a standard on this forum, but I believe should demonstrate a policy of non-response to trolls. You do the same thing on other occasions. The degree that my post is off-topic and cluttering up this newsgroup has been encouraged by your example. I think as a representative of Microsoft you should act with professionalism and keep your personal issues out of your responses. Incidentally, I am not an MS basher. I think computer progress would be at least eight years lagging in its appearance to the home user if Microsoft hadn't propelled computer usability and hardware advancement. I don't want to read your crap any more than John.Doe's crap, and if you think my post is crap, it was toppled by your dominoe. I hope you have a nice day and bask in the glow you must feel from childish name calling. I am very happy you are NOT an acquaintance. -- Milly Staples [MVP - Outlook] Post all replies to the group to keep the discussion intact. Due to the (insert latest virus name here) virus, all mail sent to my personal account will be deleted without reading. After searching google.groups.com and finding no answer, John.Doe asked: | This silly tart wrote: "Must not be making much money these days | then!" | | Yes I don't. Nobody makes as much as your pimp; are you willing to | work for me?. Did you know that there are only 6,000 girls working | on London Streets servicing about 12m people. So there will always | be demand for sex as long as there are virile men around (no such | gurantee for Microsoft products). I can only recommend you to | continue serving your master so that he can achieve that top spot. | | The days of chivalry are over; Microsoft rules the world.! They hav | tart like you working for nothing! | | | "Milly Staples [MVP - Outlook]" wrote: | || "I believe in good Financial Management!! I do not beieve in || enriching || rich jerks!" || || Must not be making much money these days then! || || -- || Milly Staples [MVP - Outlook] |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Stephen, you are as much of a lamer as John, I haven't seen you offering any
support here, just crocodiles tears for poor benighted John. Are you sure the two of you aren't brothers? "Stephen Harris" wrote in message ... "Milly Staples [MVP - Outlook]" wrote in message ... Thank you for that note - it made my day. It never ceases to amaze me how much vitriol people reserve for an inanimate object such as a corporation nor how low they will stoop to insult a perfect stranger. My response to you was a humorous one - yours was pure, unadulterated insults. All your response did was enable a dysfunctional game for two to play. Your response was humorous? Well, it went over like a lead balloon, like deciding to pat an angrily barking dog on the head has a reasonable chance of pacifying the dog rather than getting your hand bitten. Your response baited him as could well be expected and now you want to pretend to be the victim. And I am quite surprised that the corporate Microsoft entity which is composed of human beings making judgments failed to produce guidelines about ignoring John.Doe posts instead of fueling the fire with your supposedly "humorous" gibe. This is not the first time I've seen you choose to defend the faith against troll attacks. It is considered codependent to engage in such behavior. Your response was either a lie or you are far out of touch with reality. It annoyed me to see you claim your subtle retaliation was justified and "above" his tactics. You poked him to see him squeal. Since when does a corporate entity not follow instructions made by human authority which have moral/living consequences for an entire culture? You attempted to represent MS as an "inanimate object" which is not responsible for its decisions, and that John.Doe was directing his animosity towards such an inanimate object, when in fact he wrote: "I do not beieve in enriching rich jerks!" which is a personal perspective. I might condemn the Alcohol Industry for promoting alcohol to teenagers which led to Mothers Against Drunk Driving just because I may not know the names of the individuals involved who decided to target their advertising. I may also want to condemn the Tobacco Industry for tempting people to smoke when the directors knew that it would cause cancer. Because corporations enclose those industries does not make the corporation innocent because it does not have a personal identity since its polices are determined by humans who have faces and names. So there is nothing wrong with using a corporation name as a shortcut to meaning the people who are responsible, though I may not know their names. Your post twisted this legitimate choice. John.Doe certainly appears to be a woman hater. I see nothing wrong with your rejecting such a view. But his view and your response to it don't belong on this forum. As an MVP, you are not above setting a standard on this forum, but I believe should demonstrate a policy of non-response to trolls. You do the same thing on other occasions. The degree that my post is off-topic and cluttering up this newsgroup has been encouraged by your example. I think as a representative of Microsoft you should act with professionalism and keep your personal issues out of your responses. Incidentally, I am not an MS basher. I think computer progress would be at least eight years lagging in its appearance to the home user if Microsoft hadn't propelled computer usability and hardware advancement. I don't want to read your crap any more than John.Doe's crap, and if you think my post is crap, it was toppled by your dominoe. I hope you have a nice day and bask in the glow you must feel from childish name calling. I am very happy you are NOT an acquaintance. -- Milly Staples [MVP - Outlook] Post all replies to the group to keep the discussion intact. Due to the (insert latest virus name here) virus, all mail sent to my personal account will be deleted without reading. After searching google.groups.com and finding no answer, John.Doe asked: | This silly tart wrote: "Must not be making much money these days | then!" | | Yes I don't. Nobody makes as much as your pimp; are you willing to | work for me?. Did you know that there are only 6,000 girls working | on London Streets servicing about 12m people. So there will always | be demand for sex as long as there are virile men around (no such | gurantee for Microsoft products). I can only recommend you to | continue serving your master so that he can achieve that top spot. | | The days of chivalry are over; Microsoft rules the world.! They hav | tart like you working for nothing! | | | "Milly Staples [MVP - Outlook]" wrote: | || "I believe in good Financial Management!! I do not beieve in || enriching || rich jerks!" || || Must not be making much money these days then! || || -- || Milly Staples [MVP - Outlook] |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Calculating vacation accrual | Teri | Worksheet Functions | 17 | August 27th, 2004 01:29 AM |
Vacation Message | Kal | General Discussion | 3 | July 31st, 2004 02:24 AM |
Auto or Vacation Reply? | Jo | General Discussion | 2 | July 21st, 2004 10:22 PM |
Vacation Accrual | Phyllis | Worksheet Functions | 1 | March 24th, 2004 06:59 PM |
Function to figure vacation accrual | Liz | Worksheet Functions | 3 | November 13th, 2003 11:31 PM |