Outlook 2003 / Vista bug??

Has anybody found a solution to this problem with Outlook 2003 on Vista. When
the recipient adress is Bcc, Outlook shows the fulle message source?




"JSmith" wrote:

The problem occurs on messages that are sent to me with ONLY "BCC" addresses.

When I receive the message on my Outlook 2003/XP machine, the TO field shows
"undisclosed recipients", and the message displays correctly. The same
message on the Outlook 2003/Vista HP machine has the TO field empty, and the
message is displayed uninterpreted (with HTML codes showing for HTML
messages, etc.), and with all of the headers displayed.

This is a MAJOR problem with attachments since they come thru inline with
the text, and in an uninterpreted maner that makes it impossible to
reconstruct.


----------------
This post is a suggestion for Microsoft, and Microsoft responds to the
suggestions with the most votes. To vote for this suggestion, click the "I
Agree" button in the message pane. If you do not see the button, follow this
link to open the suggestion in the Microsoft Web-based Newsreader and then
click "I Agree" in the message pane.

http://www.microsoft.com/office/comm...utlook.general

What antivirus do you use on the vista machine and is it scanning email?

--
Diane Poremsky [MVP - Outlook]
Outlook Tips: http://www.outlook-tips.net/
Outlook & Exchange Solutions Center: http://www.slipstick.com

Outlook Tips by email:


EMO - a weekly newsletter about Outlook and Exchange:


You can access this newsgroup by visiting
http://www.microsoft.com/office/comm...s/default.mspx or point your
newsreader to msnews.microsoft.com.


"Ole Smith-Hansen" Ole wrote in
message ...
Has anybody found a solution to this problem with Outlook 2003 on Vista.
When
the recipient adress is Bcc, Outlook shows the fulle message source?




"JSmith" wrote:

The problem occurs on messages that are sent to me with ONLY "BCC"
addresses.

When I receive the message on my Outlook 2003/XP machine, the TO field
shows
"undisclosed recipients", and the message displays correctly. The same
message on the Outlook 2003/Vista HP machine has the TO field empty, and
the
message is displayed uninterpreted (with HTML codes showing for HTML
messages, etc.), and with all of the headers displayed.

This is a MAJOR problem with attachments since they come thru inline with
the text, and in an uninterpreted maner that makes it impossible to
reconstruct.


----------------
This post is a suggestion for Microsoft, and Microsoft responds to the
suggestions with the most votes. To vote for this suggestion, click the
"I
Agree" button in the message pane. If you do not see the button, follow
this
link to open the suggestion in the Microsoft Web-based Newsreader and
then
click "I Agree" in the message pane.

http://www.microsoft.com/office/comm...utlook.general

I am using F-prot which is scanning email

"Diane Poremsky [MVP]" wrote:

What antivirus do you use on the vista machine and is it scanning email?

--
Diane Poremsky [MVP - Outlook]
Outlook Tips: http://www.outlook-tips.net/
Outlook & Exchange Solutions Center: http://www.slipstick.com

Outlook Tips by email:


EMO - a weekly newsletter about Outlook and Exchange:


You can access this newsgroup by visiting
http://www.microsoft.com/office/comm...s/default.mspx or point your
newsreader to msnews.microsoft.com.


"Ole Smith-Hansen" Ole wrote in
message ...
Has anybody found a solution to this problem with Outlook 2003 on Vista.
When
the recipient adress is Bcc, Outlook shows the fulle message source?




"JSmith" wrote:

The problem occurs on messages that are sent to me with ONLY "BCC"
addresses.

When I receive the message on my Outlook 2003/XP machine, the TO field
shows
"undisclosed recipients", and the message displays correctly. The same
message on the Outlook 2003/Vista HP machine has the TO field empty, and
the
message is displayed uninterpreted (with HTML codes showing for HTML
messages, etc.), and with all of the headers displayed.

This is a MAJOR problem with attachments since they come thru inline with
the text, and in an uninterpreted maner that makes it impossible to
reconstruct.


----------------
This post is a suggestion for Microsoft, and Microsoft responds to the
suggestions with the most votes. To vote for this suggestion, click the
"I
Agree" button in the message pane. If you do not see the button, follow
this
link to open the suggestion in the Microsoft Web-based Newsreader and
then
click "I Agree" in the message pane.

http://www.microsoft.com/office/comm...utlook.general

After numerous attempts and much wasted time dealing with Microsoft technical
support, I believe I have finally uncovered the solution to this problem.
Here are the needed updates:

Office 2003 Service Pack 3
Update for Microsoft Windows KB957388
Update for Outlook 2003 KB953432
Outlook 2003 hotfix KB951982

You should laugh at them telling me they had never heard of this issue. I
proceeded to send them a link to their own message board documented the
problem back from the very beginning. I hope this helps everyone still
having issues.

"JSmith" wrote:

The problem occurs on messages that are sent to me with ONLY "BCC" addresses.

When I receive the message on my Outlook 2003/XP machine, the TO field shows
"undisclosed recipients", and the message displays correctly. The same
message on the Outlook 2003/Vista HP machine has the TO field empty, and the
message is displayed uninterpreted (with HTML codes showing for HTML
messages, etc.), and with all of the headers displayed.

This is a MAJOR problem with attachments since they come thru inline with
the text, and in an uninterpreted maner that makes it impossible to
reconstruct.


----------------
This post is a suggestion for Microsoft, and Microsoft responds to the
suggestions with the most votes. To vote for this suggestion, click the "I
Agree" button in the message pane. If you do not see the button, follow this
link to open the suggestion in the Microsoft Web-based Newsreader and then
click "I Agree" in the message pane.

http://www.microsoft.com/office/comm...utlook.general