Microsoft Exchange Error (0x80040102) with Outlook 2007 Beta 2

I am getting : Microsoft Exchange Error (0x80040102) : The requested
operation cannot be performed on this account.
This worked fine with the pre-release and broke with 2007 Beta 2.
I also see that this is happening to other people as well.
It seems that the synchronization of the indox is not working properly.
I found a post were someone created another folder on the server.. put a
rule in on the server to move everything to the new folder and then
replicating that new folder.
This really won't work for me due to some other rules that I have in place.
This is happening for me on two seperate systems.
This also works if I just open the mailbox online so it has no problem
accessing the inbox, it's just something that it's trying to do with the
replication which it's throwing up on.
A fix / work around would be greatly appreciated as I REALLY like the search
functionality of 2007.
Thanks.

Hi,

Does the problem occurr with or without Cache Mode?

Cheers,
Paulo

"Dan Bartz" wrote:

I am getting : Microsoft Exchange Error (0x80040102) : The requested
operation cannot be performed on this account.
This worked fine with the pre-release and broke with 2007 Beta 2.
I also see that this is happening to other people as well.
It seems that the synchronization of the indox is not working properly.
I found a post were someone created another folder on the server.. put a
rule in on the server to move everything to the new folder and then
replicating that new folder.
This really won't work for me due to some other rules that I have in place.
This is happening for me on two seperate systems.
This also works if I just open the mailbox online so it has no problem
accessing the inbox, it's just something that it's trying to do with the
replication which it's throwing up on.
A fix / work around would be greatly appreciated as I REALLY like the search
functionality of 2007.
Thanks.

For me, sorry to jump in, it is without Cache Mode.
Thanks! I will step back and see what we find out and share anything I find
out.

I asked this question because I read a post which suggested as a solution
disabling cache mode.

"Todd Fred" wrote:

For me, sorry to jump in, it is without Cache Mode.
Thanks! I will step back and see what we find out and share anything I find
out.