A Microsoft Office (Excel, Word) forum. OfficeFrustration

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » OfficeFrustration forum » Microsoft Outlook » Outlook Express
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read  

Email Scanning



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old February 17th, 2009, 09:45 PM posted to microsoft.public.outlook,microsoft.public.outlookexpress.general,microsoft.public.windows.inetexplorer.ie6_outlookexpress,microsoft.public.windows.live.mail.desktop
D. Spencer Hines[_5_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 35
Default Email Scanning

Totally Non-Substantive, Unprofessional Reply Duly Noted...

And Discarded With Wry Amusement.

Prosecutio stultitiae est gravis vexatio, executio stultitiae coronat opus.

DSH
Lux et Veritas et Libertas
Vires et Honor
Veni, Vidi, Calcitravi Asinum

"Steve Cochran" wrote in message
...

I feel sorry for anyone that [sic] knows you in real life.

"D. Spencer Hines" wrote in message
...


VERY Unprofessional...

Cochran can't see the forest for the trees.

He's focused solely on the DBX corruption problem in Outlook Express,
where he has his head firmly planted -- oblivious to other important
issues.

He's a Johnny-One-Note and can only sing one song.

Prosecutio stultitiae est gravis vexatio, executio stultitiae coronat
opus.

Email Scanning does not cause me any problems in OE because I...

KEEP MY DBX FILES TIGHTLY COMPACTED.

DELETE ASH & TRASH REGULARLY & COMPACT SEVERAL TIMES PER DAY.

DON'T LET THE FILES GET TOO BIG...

THEN EMAIL SCAN WITH CONFIDENCE, SPEED & TRANQUILITY

Vide infra for my further uneventful experiences.

Exitus Acta Probat.

DSH
Lux et Veritas et Libertas
Vires et Honor

"Steve Cochran" wrote in message
news
Balderdash & Codswallop Deleted
----------------------------------------------------------------

Email Scanning has never given me any problems.

This fuss about the supposed evils of email scanning is a tempest in a
teapot as well as bum dope.

I keep email scanning on for both send and receive and have an extra
layer of protection...

If others want to strip off that layer of protection that's their loss --
and their problem, when something goes wrong....

AND I don't send out infected files to my contacts.

Benefits All 'Round...

For Both Me & My Correspondents.

It's quite foolish not to email scan if your AV/IS software incorporates
that feature -- and I wouldn't want a program that did not have it.

I don't want the virus, trojan, worm, or whatever, to even GET to my hard
drive unannounced -- much less for me to open it.

Further, email scanning doesn't slow me down at all.

Emails open quickly and securely in Outlook Express, OUTLOOK, Windows
Live Mail, Mozilla Thunderbird and Forte Agent.

DSH
Lux et Veritas et Libertas
Vires et Honor

Further:

Banks use redundant and overlapping security systems.

CIA, DIA and NSA use redundant and overlapping security systems.

Submarines use redundant and overlapping security systems

The Federal Gold Depository at Fort Knox [think James Bond and
_Goldfinger_] uses redundant and overlapping security systems.

The New York Fed uses redundant and overlapping security systems.

Home Security Systems should employ redundant and overlapping security
systems.

Cybernetic Systems, both institutional and domestic, should employ
redundant and overlapping security systems -- contra the untutored
wailings of little rampant pogues such as "winston" and Cochran....

Some rampant, semi-hemi-quasi-educated technician pogues in these
newsgroups are very much ANTIS when it comes to Email Scanning
because they have seen it lead to corruption of Outlook Express
DBX files in the past on the systems of equally ignorant and careless
rampant pogues who do NOT regularly Clean Up and Compact
their files.

So they rant rigidly, rapturously and craniorectally inverted about the
Terrible Evils of Email Scanning...

Amusing little fellows they are.

Suitable For Public Pillorying, Excoriation & Castigation...
--
D. Spencer Hines
Lux et Veritas et Libertas
Vires et Honor
Veni, Vidi, Calcitravi Asinum



  #22  
Old February 17th, 2009, 10:28 PM posted to microsoft.public.outlook,microsoft.public.outlookexpress.general,microsoft.public.windows.inetexplorer.ie6_outlookexpress,microsoft.public.windows.live.mail.desktop
Sunny
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 29
Default Email Scanning


"D. Spencer Hines" wrote in message
...
| VERY Unprofessional...
|
| Cochran can't see the forest for the trees.
|
| He's focused solely on the DBX corruption problem in Outlook Express,
where
| he has his head firmly planted -- oblivious to other important issues.
|
| He's a Johnny-One-Note and can only sing one song.
snip crap

Why don't you write your own e-mail software?
(And check back to the NG in 2 years with your progress)


  #23  
Old February 21st, 2009, 07:48 AM posted to microsoft.public.outlook.general,microsoft.public.outlookexpress.general,microsoft.public.windows.inetexplorer.ie6_outlookexpress,microsoft.public.windows.live.mail.desktop
Дмитрий Иванович
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2
Default Email Scanning


"Gary VanderMolen" сообщил/сообщила в новостях
следующее: ...
It's quite foolish not to email scan if your AV/IS software incorporates
that feature -- and I wouldn't want a program that did not have it.


Caveat emptor! The email scanning function is in the AV product
because all the competitors include it, and it makes for another bullet
on the box for gullible buyers.

Even Symantec (Norton), the originator of the email scanning concept
admits that it is redundant and unnecessary:

"Is my computer still protected against viruses if I disable Email Scanning?
Disabling Email Scanning does not leave you unprotected against viruses
that are distributed as email attachments. Norton AntiVirus Auto-Protect
scans incoming files as they are saved to your hard drive, including email
and email attachments. Email Scanning is just another layer on top of this.
To make sure that Auto-Protect is providing the maximum protection, keep
Auto- Protect enabled and run LiveUpdate regularly to ensure that you have
the most recent virus definitions."

See http://tinyurl.com/bhsva or
http://service1.symantec.com/SUPPORT...= bar_sch_nam

--
Gary VanderMolen, MS-MVP (Mail


  #24  
Old May 18th, 2009, 09:47 PM posted to microsoft.public.outlook,microsoft.public.outlookexpress.general,microsoft.public.windows.inetexplorer.ie6_outlookexpress,microsoft.public.windows.live.mail.desktop
kate[_4_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 73
Default Email Scanning



"Steve Cochran" a йcrit dans le message de groupe de
discussion : ...
I feel sorry for anyone that knows you in real life.


"D. Spencer Hines" wrote in message
...
VERY Unprofessional...

Cochran can't see the forest for the trees.

He's focused solely on the DBX corruption problem in Outlook Express,
where
he has his head firmly planted -- oblivious to other important issues.

He's a Johnny-One-Note and can only sing one song.

Prosecutio stultitiae est gravis vexatio, executio stultitiae coronat
opus.

Email Scanning does not cause me any problems in OE because I...

KEEP MY DBX FILES TIGHTLY COMPACTED.

DELETE ASH & TRASH REGULARLY & COMPACT SEVERAL TIMES PER DAY.

DON'T LET THE FILES GET TOO BIG...

THEN EMAIL SCAN WITH CONFIDENCE, SPEED & TRANQUILITY

Vide infra for my further uneventful experiences.

Exitus Acta Probat.

DSH
Lux et Veritas et Libertas
Vires et Honor

"Steve Cochran" wrote in message
news
Balderdash & Codswallop Deleted
----------------------------------------------------------------

Email Scanning has never given me any problems.

This fuss about the supposed evils of email scanning is a tempest in a
teapot as well as bum dope.

I keep email scanning on for both send and receive and have an extra
layer
of protection...

If others want to strip off that layer of protection that's their loss --
and their problem, when something goes wrong....

AND I don't send out infected files to my contacts.

Benefits All 'Round...

For Both Me & My Correspondents.

It's quite foolish not to email scan if your AV/IS software incorporates
that feature -- and I wouldn't want a program that did not have it.

I don't want the virus, trojan, worm, or whatever, to even GET to my hard
drive unannounced -- much less for me to open it.

Further, email scanning doesn't slow me down at all.

Emails open quickly and securely in Outlook Express, OUTLOOK, Windows
Live
Mail, Mozilla Thunderbird and Forte Agent.

DSH
Lux et Veritas et Libertas
Vires et Honor

Further:

Banks use redundant and overlapping security systems.

CIA, DIA and NSA use redundant and overlapping security systems.

Submarines use redundant and overlapping security systems

The Federal Gold Depository at Fort Knox [think James Bond and
_Goldfinger_]
uses redundant and overlapping security systems.

The New York Fed uses redundant and overlapping security systems.

Home Security Systems should employ redundant and overlapping security
systems.

Cybernetic Systems, both institutional and domestic, should employ
redundant
and overlapping security systems -- contra the untutored wailings of
little
rampant pogues such as "winston" and Cochran....

Some rampant, semi-hemi-quasi-educated technician pogues in these
newsgroups
are very much ANTIS when it comes to Email Scanning because they have
seen
it lead to corruption of Outlook Express DBX files in the past on the
systems of equally ignorant and careless rampant pogues who do NOT
regularly
Clean Up and Compact their files.

So they rant rigidly, rapturously and craniorectally inverted about the
Terrible Evils of Email Scanning...

Amusing little fellows they are.

Suitable For Public Pillorying, Excoriation & Castigation...
--
D. Spencer Hines
Lux et Veritas et Libertas
Vires et Honor
Veni, Vidi, Calcitravi Asinum


  #25  
Old May 18th, 2009, 09:47 PM posted to microsoft.public.outlook,microsoft.public.outlookexpress.general,microsoft.public.windows.inetexplorer.ie6_outlookexpress,microsoft.public.windows.live.mail.desktop
kate[_4_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 73
Default Email Scanning



"Hal Hostetler [MVP-P/I]" a йcrit dans le message de groupe
de discussion : ...
Not particularly bright, is he?

Hal
--
Hal Hostetler, CPBE --

Senior Engineer/MIS -- MS MVP-Print/Imaging -- WA7BGX
http://www.kvoa.com -- "When News breaks, we fix it!"
KVOA Television, Tucson, AZ. NBC Channel 4
Still Cadillacin' - www.badnewsbluesband.com

"Peter Foldes" wrote in message
...
Aha. I see that you are starting the second phase of your trolling. Get a
life already

--
Peter

Please Reply to Newsgroup for the benefit of others
Requests for assistance by email can not and will not be acknowledged.

"D. Spencer Hines" wrote in message
...
VERY Unprofessional...

Cochran can't see the forest for the trees.

He's focused solely on the DBX corruption problem in Outlook Express,
where
he has his head firmly planted -- oblivious to other important issues.

He's a Johnny-One-Note and can only sing one song.

Prosecutio stultitiae est gravis vexatio, executio stultitiae coronat
opus.

Email Scanning does not cause me any problems in OE because I...

KEEP MY DBX FILES TIGHTLY COMPACTED.

DELETE ASH & TRASH REGULARLY & COMPACT SEVERAL TIMES PER DAY.

DON'T LET THE FILES GET TOO BIG...

THEN EMAIL SCAN WITH CONFIDENCE, SPEED & TRANQUILITY

Vide infra for my further uneventful experiences.

Exitus Acta Probat.

DSH
Lux et Veritas et Libertas
Vires et Honor

"Steve Cochran" wrote in message
news
Balderdash & Codswallop Deleted
----------------------------------------------------------------

Email Scanning has never given me any problems.

This fuss about the supposed evils of email scanning is a tempest in a
teapot as well as bum dope.

I keep email scanning on for both send and receive and have an extra
layer
of protection...

If others want to strip off that layer of protection that's their
loss --
and their problem, when something goes wrong....

AND I don't send out infected files to my contacts.

Benefits All 'Round...

For Both Me & My Correspondents.

It's quite foolish not to email scan if your AV/IS software incorporates
that feature -- and I wouldn't want a program that did not have it.

I don't want the virus, trojan, worm, or whatever, to even GET to my
hard
drive unannounced -- much less for me to open it.

Further, email scanning doesn't slow me down at all.

Emails open quickly and securely in Outlook Express, OUTLOOK, Windows
Live
Mail, Mozilla Thunderbird and Forte Agent.

DSH
Lux et Veritas et Libertas
Vires et Honor

Further:

Banks use redundant and overlapping security systems.

CIA, DIA and NSA use redundant and overlapping security systems.

Submarines use redundant and overlapping security systems

The Federal Gold Depository at Fort Knox [think James Bond and
_Goldfinger_]
uses redundant and overlapping security systems.

The New York Fed uses redundant and overlapping security systems.

Home Security Systems should employ redundant and overlapping security
systems.

Cybernetic Systems, both institutional and domestic, should employ
redundant
and overlapping security systems -- contra the untutored wailings of
little
rampant pogues such as "winston" and Cochran....

Some rampant, semi-hemi-quasi-educated technician pogues in these
newsgroups
are very much ANTIS when it comes to Email Scanning because they have
seen
it lead to corruption of Outlook Express DBX files in the past on the
systems of equally ignorant and careless rampant pogues who do NOT
regularly
Clean Up and Compact their files.

So they rant rigidly, rapturously and craniorectally inverted about the
Terrible Evils of Email Scanning...

Amusing little fellows they are.

Suitable For Public Pillorying, Excoriation & Castigation...
--
D. Spencer Hines
Lux et Veritas et Libertas
Vires et Honor
Veni, Vidi, Calcitravi Asinum



  #26  
Old May 19th, 2009, 12:36 PM posted to microsoft.public.outlook,microsoft.public.outlookexpress.general,microsoft.public.windows.inetexplorer.ie6_outlookexpress,microsoft.public.windows.live.mail.desktop
Brian Tillman [MVP - Outlook]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 10,888
Default Email Scanning

"kate" wrote in message
...
nothing

And your purpose of posting quotes of someone else's message is?
--
Brian Tillman [MVP-Outlook]

  #27  
Old May 19th, 2009, 08:11 PM posted to microsoft.public.outlook,microsoft.public.outlookexpress.general,microsoft.public.windows.inetexplorer.ie6_outlookexpress,microsoft.public.windows.live.mail.desktop
Peter Foldes
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,300
Default Email Scanning

Also quoted from posts from over 1 year ago

--
Peter

Please Reply to Newsgroup for the benefit of others
Requests for assistance by email can not and will not be acknowledged.

"Brian Tillman [MVP - Outlook]" wrote in message
...
"kate" wrote in message
...
nothing

And your purpose of posting quotes of someone else's message is?
--
Brian Tillman [MVP-Outlook]


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:49 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 OfficeFrustration.
The comments are property of their posters.