A Microsoft Office (Excel, Word) forum. OfficeFrustration

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » OfficeFrustration forum » Microsoft Outlook » Calendar
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read  

"Best" way to compare two versions of calender based on same PST file



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old September 2nd, 2009, 01:19 PM posted to microsoft.public.outlook.calendaring
Jim5941
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 37
Default "Best" way to compare two versions of calender based on same PST file

Somewhere along the line in the last week or so I have had some
corruption sneak into my calender as a result of some bad behavior by
Outlook, my iPhone, or the sync conduit.

As a result I have some "repeating" meetings that have turned into a
series of individual events, and some repeating events that have
disappeared entirely.

I would like to try to "compare" my current calendar to the backup
copy of my PST from some time back (I think about 2 weeks ago) (I do
make daily backups of my PST).

I'm using Outlook 2007. I guess Icould open a copy of the backup PST
compare
them side- by-side in day/week/Month view ...

Or switch to one of the table views which
would make it somewhat easier like the "All appointments" view except
that it does not seem you can do that as a side-by-side arrangement.
So I could print one calender out hard-copy compare and drag events
that are missing or screwed up from the old backup calender to the
current calendar....

Is there an easier way? A "difference engine" would be very
nice ;-)

Thanks in advance for helping a Outlook dufus....
Jim

PS: I realize this is not an iPhone or a "sync" group, but it does
seem that the iPhone has some issued related to syncing repeating
events with Outlook, if anybody has any solutions on this I'd be all
ears ;-)
  #2  
Old September 2nd, 2009, 02:22 PM posted to microsoft.public.outlook.calendaring
Bob I
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 10,698
Default "Best" way to compare two versions of calender based on samePST file

Depending on the level of comparison needed, I suppose you could go so
far as to export the two calendars to CSV files and then compare them
with FC (filecompare in the operating system) or other file compare utility.

Jim5941 wrote:

Somewhere along the line in the last week or so I have had some
corruption sneak into my calender as a result of some bad behavior by
Outlook, my iPhone, or the sync conduit.

As a result I have some "repeating" meetings that have turned into a
series of individual events, and some repeating events that have
disappeared entirely.

I would like to try to "compare" my current calendar to the backup
copy of my PST from some time back (I think about 2 weeks ago) (I do
make daily backups of my PST).

I'm using Outlook 2007. I guess Icould open a copy of the backup PST
compare
them side- by-side in day/week/Month view ...

Or switch to one of the table views which
would make it somewhat easier like the "All appointments" view except
that it does not seem you can do that as a side-by-side arrangement.
So I could print one calender out hard-copy compare and drag events
that are missing or screwed up from the old backup calender to the
current calendar....

Is there an easier way? A "difference engine" would be very
nice ;-)

Thanks in advance for helping a Outlook dufus....
Jim

PS: I realize this is not an iPhone or a "sync" group, but it does
seem that the iPhone has some issued related to syncing repeating
events with Outlook, if anybody has any solutions on this I'd be all
ears ;-)


  #3  
Old September 2nd, 2009, 02:50 PM posted to microsoft.public.outlook.calendaring
Jim5941
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 37
Default "Best" way to compare two versions of calender based on same PSTfile

Thanks Bob!

I guess I can use table view and see how different the number of
entries is.. and if not too many just go "find them" and put them
back... Then I think I still have to "review" the repeating and multi-
day events to see if they have been corrupted, but I think I should be
able to add a few custom fields to one of the table views and perhaps
accomplish that part....

If it starts to look real ugly I'll go with your CSV approach, I like
it :-)

Jim


On Sep 2, 9:22*am, Bob I wrote:
Depending on the level of comparison needed, I suppose you could go so
far as to export the two calendars to CSV files and then compare them
with FC (filecompare in the operating system) or other file compare utility.




  #4  
Old September 2nd, 2009, 04:42 PM posted to microsoft.public.outlook.calendaring
Bob I
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 10,698
Default "Best" way to compare two versions of calender based on samePST file

You're welcome, have a great day!

Jim5941 wrote:

Thanks Bob!

I guess I can use table view and see how different the number of
entries is.. and if not too many just go "find them" and put them
back... Then I think I still have to "review" the repeating and multi-
day events to see if they have been corrupted, but I think I should be
able to add a few custom fields to one of the table views and perhaps
accomplish that part....

If it starts to look real ugly I'll go with your CSV approach, I like
it :-)

Jim


On Sep 2, 9:22 am, Bob I wrote:

Depending on the level of comparison needed, I suppose you could go so
far as to export the two calendars to CSV files and then compare them
with FC (filecompare in the operating system) or other file compare utility.






 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:13 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 OfficeFrustration.
The comments are property of their posters.