If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Outlook Express and antivirus checking
I've often seen advice from Microsoft MVPs on one or both of these
newsgroups that the email scanning facility of one's antivirus program should be turned off, because it can cause problems in OE and does not serve any useful purpose. I've just installed WinXP, OE6 and AVG Free on my wife's computer. When looking to turn off the AVG email scanning, I went to the AVG Free Forum, quoted the MVP advice referred to above, and asked whether email scanning should be turned off while using OE as our email client. The AVG reply was: "In my opinion this isn't a good idea. For one, if the email scanner is setup properly there will be no issues. The default settings already support the majority of the users with the main ones that it requires changes for being the SSL type of email which that you setup manually. "While most ISPs also scan email now.. not all do and not all antivirus scanners are made equal so I prefer to scan my own. I would rather catch a malware before it got to my email client than to rely on the on access scanner of an antivirus program. " I'd be grateful for some comments from MVPs on this AVG reply. If the original MVP advice still stands, why? And what issues gave rise to this advice? Thank you in anticipation. Lindsay Graham |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Outlook Express and antivirus checking
E-mail scanning is a redundant option that wreaks havoc with OE, regardless
if it is Norton. McAfee, AVG or any other. Turning off e-mail scanning is safe. See: Viral Irony: The Most Common Cause of Corruption. http://www.microsoft.com/windows/IE/...ion.mspx#EOAAC And this is from Symantec, but applies to all anti-virus programs. From: http://snipurl.com/bmf6 Is my computer still protected against viruses if I disable Email Scanning? Disabling Email Scanning does not leave you unprotected against viruses that are distributed as email attachments. Norton AntiVirus Auto-Protect scans incoming files as they are saved to your hard drive, including email and email attachments. Email Scanning is just another layer on top of this. To make sure that Auto-Protect is providing the maximum protection, keep Auto-Protect enabled and run LiveUpdate regularly to ensure that you have the most recent virus definitions. BTY, I have used AVG for some time now. Reinstall AVG and choose Custom Mode. Uncheck E-mail Scanning when you see that option. For some reason, just unchecking it in the security center causes a conflict with the Windows Security Center. Make sure you reboot when you're done. -- Bruce Hagen MS-MVP Outlook Express ~IB-CA~ "Lindsay Graham" wrote in message ... I've often seen advice from Microsoft MVPs on one or both of these newsgroups that the email scanning facility of one's antivirus program should be turned off, because it can cause problems in OE and does not serve any useful purpose. I've just installed WinXP, OE6 and AVG Free on my wife's computer. When looking to turn off the AVG email scanning, I went to the AVG Free Forum, quoted the MVP advice referred to above, and asked whether email scanning should be turned off while using OE as our email client. The AVG reply was: "In my opinion this isn't a good idea. For one, if the email scanner is setup properly there will be no issues. The default settings already support the majority of the users with the main ones that it requires changes for being the SSL type of email which that you setup manually. "While most ISPs also scan email now.. not all do and not all antivirus scanners are made equal so I prefer to scan my own. I would rather catch a malware before it got to my email client than to rely on the on access scanner of an antivirus program. " I'd be grateful for some comments from MVPs on this AVG reply. If the original MVP advice still stands, why? And what issues gave rise to this advice? Thank you in anticipation. Lindsay Graham |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Outlook Express and antivirus checking
Lindsay
I cannot echo strong enough what Bruce has posted to your question. Email scanning by any AV can and will cause issues in OE no matter how perfectly it is set up. Keep in mind that some that never had any problems is because this issue is like a Russian Roulette. They got lucky and only until they get hit which is inevitable. -- Peter Please Reply to Newsgroup for the benefit of others Requests for assistance by email can not and will not be acknowledged. "Lindsay Graham" wrote in message ... I've often seen advice from Microsoft MVPs on one or both of these newsgroups that the email scanning facility of one's antivirus program should be turned off, because it can cause problems in OE and does not serve any useful purpose. I've just installed WinXP, OE6 and AVG Free on my wife's computer. When looking to turn off the AVG email scanning, I went to the AVG Free Forum, quoted the MVP advice referred to above, and asked whether email scanning should be turned off while using OE as our email client. The AVG reply was: "In my opinion this isn't a good idea. For one, if the email scanner is setup properly there will be no issues. The default settings already support the majority of the users with the main ones that it requires changes for being the SSL type of email which that you setup manually. "While most ISPs also scan email now.. not all do and not all antivirus scanners are made equal so I prefer to scan my own. I would rather catch a malware before it got to my email client than to rely on the on access scanner of an antivirus program. " I'd be grateful for some comments from MVPs on this AVG reply. If the original MVP advice still stands, why? And what issues gave rise to this advice? Thank you in anticipation. Lindsay Graham |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Outlook Express and antivirus checking
QP
"Keep It Simple, Stupid". /QP Well said, Norman. -- ~Bruce "N. Miller" wrote in message ... On Wed, 7 Mar 2007 14:14:04 +1100, Lindsay Graham wrote: I'd be grateful for some comments from MVPs on this AVG reply. If the original MVP advice still stands, why? And what issues gave rise to this advice? I am not an MVP, nor do I wish to be one. I have some comments of my own to add. The guy who says, "I would rather catch a malware before it got to my email client than to rely on the on access scanner of an antivirus program.", clearly does not understand what he is saying. An AV scanner acts as a proxy, accessing the email account, and writing the email to a local temporary file, then running the scan. So you are downloading the email from the server anyway. But what happens if something goes awry while the message is in this limbo? And it is the same scanning engine, the same definitions, that will be in play whether you scan, or don't scan. As the MVPs keep pointing out, client side anti virus scanning is redundant. What they haven't pointed out is that it violates the "KISS" principle. By creating a Rube Goldberg contraption, AV email scanning is anything but "Keep It Simple, Stupid". -- Norman ~Shine, bright morning light, ~now in the air the spring is coming. ~Sweet, blowing wind, ~singing down the hills and valleys. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Outlook Express and antivirus checking
Whoever wrote that did not understand how email scanning works or how AVG
works. Once you disable email scanning and disable the email plugin AVG will still protect you just as well. -- Frank Saunders, MS-MVP OE/WM http://www.fjsmjs.com "Lindsay Graham" wrote in message ... I've often seen advice from Microsoft MVPs on one or both of these newsgroups that the email scanning facility of one's antivirus program should be turned off, because it can cause problems in OE and does not serve any useful purpose. I've just installed WinXP, OE6 and AVG Free on my wife's computer. When looking to turn off the AVG email scanning, I went to the AVG Free Forum, quoted the MVP advice referred to above, and asked whether email scanning should be turned off while using OE as our email client. The AVG reply was: "In my opinion this isn't a good idea. For one, if the email scanner is setup properly there will be no issues. The default settings already support the majority of the users with the main ones that it requires changes for being the SSL type of email which that you setup manually. "While most ISPs also scan email now.. not all do and not all antivirus scanners are made equal so I prefer to scan my own. I would rather catch a malware before it got to my email client than to rely on the on access scanner of an antivirus program. " I'd be grateful for some comments from MVPs on this AVG reply. If the original MVP advice still stands, why? And what issues gave rise to this advice? Thank you in anticipation. Lindsay Graham |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Outlook Express and antivirus checking
Did you really think any maker of a product would admit the product causes
as many problems as it fixes Logic and legal liability precludes an honest answer from av makers -- - Adaware http://www.lavasoft.de spybot http://www.safer-networking.org AVG free antivirus http://free.grisoft.com/ Etrust/Vet/CA.online Antivirus scan http://www3.ca.com/securityadvisor/virusinfo/scan.aspx Super Antispyware http://www.superantispyware.com/ Panda online AntiVirus scan http://www.activescan.com Panda online AntiSpyware Scan http://www.pandasoftware.com/virus_info/spyware/test/ Catalog of removal tools (1) http://www.pandasoftware.com/download/utilities/ Catalog of removal tools (2) http://www3.ca.com/securityadvisor/n...aspx?CID=40387 Trouble Shooting guide to Windows http://mvps.org/winhelp2002/ Blocking Unwanted Parasites with a Hosts file http://mvps.org/winhelp2002/hosts.htm links provided as a courtesy, read all instructions on the pages before use Grateful thanks to the authors/webmasters _ "Lindsay Graham" wrote in message ... I've often seen advice from Microsoft MVPs on one or both of these newsgroups that the email scanning facility of one's antivirus program should be turned off, because it can cause problems in OE and does not serve any useful purpose. I've just installed WinXP, OE6 and AVG Free on my wife's computer. When looking to turn off the AVG email scanning, I went to the AVG Free Forum, quoted the MVP advice referred to above, and asked whether email scanning should be turned off while using OE as our email client. The AVG reply was: "In my opinion this isn't a good idea. For one, if the email scanner is setup properly there will be no issues. The default settings already support the majority of the users with the main ones that it requires changes for being the SSL type of email which that you setup manually. "While most ISPs also scan email now.. not all do and not all antivirus scanners are made equal so I prefer to scan my own. I would rather catch a malware before it got to my email client than to rely on the on access scanner of an antivirus program. " I'd be grateful for some comments from MVPs on this AVG reply. If the original MVP advice still stands, why? And what issues gave rise to this advice? Thank you in anticipation. Lindsay Graham |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Outlook Express and antivirus checking
Thanks for all the replies, which certainly confirmed what has been said
before. I've suggested that the correspondent on the AVG Forum refer to this exchange of posts and reconsider his/her earlier advice. If anyone wants to look at the relevant messages on the Forum, see http://forum.grisoft.cz/freeforum/list.php?3,page=1. I'll post the result here in due course. Pardon my ignorance, but I had no idea who Rube Goldberg was. But with the help of Wikipaedia, I now know who he was and what a Rube Goldberg contraption was. What a great feller he must have been! Lindsay Graham Canberra, Australia "N. Miller" wrote in message ... On Wed, 7 Mar 2007 14:14:04 +1100, Lindsay Graham wrote: I'd be grateful for some comments from MVPs on this AVG reply. If the original MVP advice still stands, why? And what issues gave rise to this advice? I am not an MVP, nor do I wish to be one. I have some comments of my own to add. The guy who says, "I would rather catch a malware before it got to my email client than to rely on the on access scanner of an antivirus program.", clearly does not understand what he is saying. An AV scanner acts as a proxy, accessing the email account, and writing the email to a local temporary file, then running the scan. So you are downloading the email from the server anyway. But what happens if something goes awry while the message is in this limbo? And it is the same scanning engine, the same definitions, that will be in play whether you scan, or don't scan. As the MVPs keep pointing out, client side anti virus scanning is redundant. What they haven't pointed out is that it violates the "KISS" principle. By creating a Rube Goldberg contraption, AV email scanning is anything but "Keep It Simple, Stupid". -- Norman ~Shine, bright morning light, ~now in the air the spring is coming. ~Sweet, blowing wind, ~singing down the hills and valleys. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Outlook Express and antivirus checking
I said I'd post the result here, but basically, there was no result. If you
want to share in the frustration that I felt g, have a look at the AVG Forum URL below -- the only person who responded substantively refused to address the reasons given on this newsgroup as to why it's better to turn off the email scanner, and after going round in circles for quite some, I gave up. Lindsay Graham Canberra, Australia "Lindsay Graham" wrote in message ... Thanks for all the replies, which certainly confirmed what has been said before. I've suggested that the correspondent on the AVG Forum refer to this exchange of posts and reconsider his/her earlier advice. If anyone wants to look at the relevant messages on the Forum, see http://forum.grisoft.cz/freeforum/list.php?3,page=1. I'll post the result here in due course. Pardon my ignorance, but I had no idea who Rube Goldberg was. But with the help of Wikipaedia, I now know who he was and what a Rube Goldberg contraption was. What a great feller he must have been! Lindsay Graham Canberra, Australia "N. Miller" wrote in message ... On Wed, 7 Mar 2007 14:14:04 +1100, Lindsay Graham wrote: I'd be grateful for some comments from MVPs on this AVG reply. If the original MVP advice still stands, why? And what issues gave rise to this advice? I am not an MVP, nor do I wish to be one. I have some comments of my own to add. The guy who says, "I would rather catch a malware before it got to my email client than to rely on the on access scanner of an antivirus program.", clearly does not understand what he is saying. An AV scanner acts as a proxy, accessing the email account, and writing the email to a local temporary file, then running the scan. So you are downloading the email from the server anyway. But what happens if something goes awry while the message is in this limbo? And it is the same scanning engine, the same definitions, that will be in play whether you scan, or don't scan. As the MVPs keep pointing out, client side anti virus scanning is redundant. What they haven't pointed out is that it violates the "KISS" principle. By creating a Rube Goldberg contraption, AV email scanning is anything but "Keep It Simple, Stupid". |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Outlook Express and antivirus checking
Don't believe them. I have been using AVG for quite awhile and have never
used e-mail scanning in that or any other AV program. Even Norton agrees you are still safe. Turning off e-mail scanning is safe. See: Viral Irony: The Most Common Cause of Corruption. http://www.microsoft.com/windows/IE/...ion.mspx#EOAAC And this is from Symantec, but applies to all anti-virus programs. From: http://snipurl.com/bmf6 Is my computer still protected against viruses if I disable Email Scanning? Disabling Email Scanning does not leave you unprotected against viruses that are distributed as email attachments. Norton AntiVirus Auto-Protect scans incoming files as they are saved to your hard drive, including email and email attachments. Email Scanning is just another layer on top of this. To make sure that Auto-Protect is providing the maximum protection, keep Auto-Protect enabled and run LiveUpdate regularly to ensure that you have the most recent virus definitions. Take heed he Reinstall AVG and choose Custom Mode. Uncheck E-mail Scanning when you see that option. For some reason, just unchecking it in the security center causes a conflict with the Windows Security Center. Make sure you reboot when you're done. -- Bruce Hagen MS-MVP Outlook Express ~IB-CA~ "Lindsay Graham" wrote in message ... I said I'd post the result here, but basically, there was no result. If you want to share in the frustration that I felt g, have a look at the AVG Forum URL below -- the only person who responded substantively refused to address the reasons given on this newsgroup as to why it's better to turn off the email scanner, and after going round in circles for quite some, I gave up. Lindsay Graham Canberra, Australia "Lindsay Graham" wrote in message ... Thanks for all the replies, which certainly confirmed what has been said before. I've suggested that the correspondent on the AVG Forum refer to this exchange of posts and reconsider his/her earlier advice. If anyone wants to look at the relevant messages on the Forum, see http://forum.grisoft.cz/freeforum/list.php?3,page=1. I'll post the result here in due course. Pardon my ignorance, but I had no idea who Rube Goldberg was. But with the help of Wikipaedia, I now know who he was and what a Rube Goldberg contraption was. What a great feller he must have been! Lindsay Graham Canberra, Australia "N. Miller" wrote in message ... On Wed, 7 Mar 2007 14:14:04 +1100, Lindsay Graham wrote: I'd be grateful for some comments from MVPs on this AVG reply. If the original MVP advice still stands, why? And what issues gave rise to this advice? I am not an MVP, nor do I wish to be one. I have some comments of my own to add. The guy who says, "I would rather catch a malware before it got to my email client than to rely on the on access scanner of an antivirus program.", clearly does not understand what he is saying. An AV scanner acts as a proxy, accessing the email account, and writing the email to a local temporary file, then running the scan. So you are downloading the email from the server anyway. But what happens if something goes awry while the message is in this limbo? And it is the same scanning engine, the same definitions, that will be in play whether you scan, or don't scan. As the MVPs keep pointing out, client side anti virus scanning is redundant. What they haven't pointed out is that it violates the "KISS" principle. By creating a Rube Goldberg contraption, AV email scanning is anything but "Keep It Simple, Stupid". |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Outlook Express and antivirus checking
"Lindsay Graham" wrote in message ... I said I'd post the result here, but basically, there was no result. If you want to share in the frustration that I felt g, have a look at the AVG Forum URL below -- the only person who responded substantively refused to address the reasons given on this newsgroup as to why it's better to turn off the email scanner, and after going round in circles for quite some, I gave up. Lindsay Graham Canberra, Australia "Lindsay Graham" wrote in message ... Thanks for all the replies, which certainly confirmed what has been said before. I've suggested that the correspondent on the AVG Forum refer to this exchange of posts and reconsider his/her earlier advice. If anyone wants to look at the relevant messages on the Forum, see http://forum.grisoft.cz/freeforum/list.php?3,page=1. I'll post the result here in due course. Pardon my ignorance, but I had no idea who Rube Goldberg was. But with the help of Wikipaedia, I now know who he was and what a Rube Goldberg contraption was. What a great feller he must have been! Lindsay Graham Canberra, Australia "N. Miller" wrote in message ... On Wed, 7 Mar 2007 14:14:04 +1100, Lindsay Graham wrote: I'd be grateful for some comments from MVPs on this AVG reply. If the original MVP advice still stands, why? And what issues gave rise to this advice? I am not an MVP, nor do I wish to be one. I have some comments of my own to add. The guy who says, "I would rather catch a malware before it got to my email client than to rely on the on access scanner of an antivirus program.", clearly does not understand what he is saying. An AV scanner acts as a proxy, accessing the email account, and writing the email to a local temporary file, then running the scan. So you are downloading the email from the server anyway. But what happens if something goes awry while the message is in this limbo? And it is the same scanning engine, the same definitions, that will be in play whether you scan, or don't scan. As the MVPs keep pointing out, client side anti virus scanning is redundant. What they haven't pointed out is that it violates the "KISS" principle. By creating a Rube Goldberg contraption, AV email scanning is anything but "Keep It Simple, Stupid". |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|