The graphics and pictures cannot be seen

On Mon, 7 Nov 2005 09:28:26 +0000, Jimbo wrote
(in article ):

Sorry Naweed, but that response is from a troll. She often belittles people
to boost her poor self esteem. Most people in these news groups are
professional as well and are happy to help. Unfortunately the few like this
one seem to stand out.

Excuse me, but I'm not the one on MS's ' grey list'. You do realise that
every post of yours is being automatically logged and sent to MS, don't you?
Your only existence here is to harass me (which you're not doing by the way,
I'm not bothered in the slightest). If I didn't post, neither would you.

I am not a troll. A troll is someone who posts seeking conflict (e.g. a white
supremacist or right wing xian posting in a group discussing Hinduism or
Asian culture, for example). They post to incite. I do not. My advice, whilst
a little harsh I will admit, is never the less advice. You are the troll,
you're only posting to get a rise out of someone (i.e. me) and, if I ceased
posting, so would you. You do not contribute in any way, shape or form.

I know when IHBT.

HAND, now, y'hear...?

I'm on the "gray" list? LMFAO
You have biggest most unwelcome presence of anyone on ms groups. You harass
people constantly and I wont stand for it. Every time you call someone a
name or insult their intelligence I will correct you and show what an utter
waste of time your presence is here. You can "forward" that to ms if you
like as I will "forward" your posts as well, we can see who's posts are more
inflammatory, yours or mine.
" My advice, whilst
a little harsh I will admit, is never the less advice."

Well If I have different opinion on said advice I will voice that opinion
just as you post your advice. Got it?

Where are all your allies and as I mentioned, have you received kudos for
your return? Nope.

wrote in message
. net...
On Mon, 7 Nov 2005 09:28:26 +0000, Jimbo wrote
(in article ):

Sorry Naweed, but that response is from a troll. She often belittles
people
to boost her poor self esteem. Most people in these news groups are
professional as well and are happy to help. Unfortunately the few like
this
one seem to stand out.

Excuse me, but I'm not the one on MS's ' grey list'. You do realise that
every post of yours is being automatically logged and sent to MS, don't
you?
Your only existence here is to harass me (which you're not doing by the
way,
I'm not bothered in the slightest). If I didn't post, neither would you.

I am not a troll. A troll is someone who posts seeking conflict (e.g. a
white
supremacist or right wing xian posting in a group discussing Hinduism or
Asian culture, for example). They post to incite. I do not. My advice,
whilst
a little harsh I will admit, is never the less advice. You are the troll,
you're only posting to get a rise out of someone (i.e. me) and, if I
ceased
posting, so would you. You do not contribute in any way, shape or form.

I know when IHBT.

HAND, now, y'hear...?

On Tue, 8 Nov 2005 03:36:55 +0000, Jimbo wrote
(in article ):

I'm on the "gray" list? LMFAO

Yes. Mike Brannigan is logging your posts. He supports me 100%.


You have biggest most unwelcome presence of anyone on ms groups.

Says you.


You harass
people constantly

Er, I don't "harass" anyone. You harass me. If I constantly picked on the
same person over and over, ad nauseam et ad infinitum, then yes I would be
harassing whoever it was.

Suggest you avail yourself of a dictionary: -

harass verb (harasses, harassed, harassing) 1 to pester, torment or trouble
someone by continually questioning or attacking them.

Which is exactly what you're doing to me.


and I wont stand for it. Every time you call someone a
name or insult their intelligence

I have insulted no-one's intelligence. Correcting someone's English usage is
not "insulting their intelligence" - Ed does it too, but I don't see you
harassing him (to use your word). You, for example, need to acquaint
yourself with the apostrophe.


I will correct you and show what an utter
waste of time your presence is here.

I contribute. You do not. You harass. You are a troll. You are the blueprint
of the 'Moral Crusade Troll' - defending Usenet from those you deem "unfit",
inculpating them for your own egotistical ends. In reality, your "crusade" is
pointless because you'll end up being kill-filed and/or reported and you
cannot continue a crusade without a soapbox, now can you...?


You can "forward" that to ms if you
like as I will "forward" your posts as well, we can see who's posts are more
inflammatory, yours or mine.

Do make sense "see who is posts..." is what you've written. The word is
'whose' as in 'belonging to whom'.

It's got nothing to do with being inflammatory. I post to educate, not
inflame. You post to inflame, but you're no more irritating than a mosquito
bite.

MS knows about you. My MS contact has seen my posts and doesn't appear to
think they're inflammatory. I did think I'd been blacklisted once, but it
turned out to be a problem with my news server.


" My advice, whilst
a little harsh I will admit, is never the less advice."

Well If I have different opinion on said advice I will voice that opinion
just as you post your advice. Got it?

You're a republican, aren't you...?



Where are all your allies and as I mentioned, have you received kudos for
your return? Nope.


How do you know? Can you see the contents of my inbox from there?

And, judging by the cursory Googling I've just done, I'm not the only one who
thinks you're a waste of oxygen. A name for you - David Lipman. I know David
(not well it has to be said) but I do know that it takes a lot to irritate
him and you *REALLY* ****ed in his coffee.

Now, you either quit trolling Usenet after me (actually just quit trolling
Usenet, full stop), or I take this further. A lot further.

Get it into whatever it is you have that passes for a brain that NO ONE'S
INTERESTED.

I have requested that Google remove the link you keep posting.

You have 24 hours. What you're doing isn't big, and it certainly isn't
clever. It's immature, juvenile and just plain childish.

Just to show there are no hard feelings, here's a little gift for you

http://tinyurl.com/9vq25

You HAND now...

skrev i meddelandet
. net...
On Tue, 8 Nov 2005 03:36:55 +0000, Jimbo wrote
(in article ):

Snipped

I have insulted no-one's intelligence. Correcting someone's English usage
is
not "insulting their intelligence" -
Snipped

Ah another dickwad who can't be arsed to STFW, I see
. net

Er, unless you have Acrobat how are you going to be able to edit the
text,
brainiac?!
. net

Ah, another imbecilic troll I see...
. net

I see you're another idiot who sprinkles apostrophes around like
confetti.
. net

Nah, you're not a computer dummy, you're just a dummy.
. net

By asking this it proves you are too damned
lazy to wipe your own arse and you want someone to do it for you!
. net

Sorry, we don't do personal replies (though as you're an AOHELL luser,
I
don't know why I'm bothering to reply here, either).
. net

What is this - a stupidity epidemic?
. net

What did your last slave die of? STFW you lazy bint! Here's a clue -
what's
the brand...?
. net

Mary, will you quit wiping idiots' arses?! If they're too stupid and
lazy to
. net

Ah yes, "can't see' the classic euphemism for "I'm a lazy f**kwit, I
can't be
arsed to RTFH, or to STFW. Please wipe my arse for me, because I'm too lazy
to find the bog roll..."
. net


Snipped

It's got nothing to do with being inflammatory. I post to educate, not
inflame. You post to inflame, but you're no more irritating than a
mosquito
bite.

Snipped

Regards,

Gunilla.

AKA

Sarah Jayne Balfour
Craigy Fulmer Road
Gerrards Cross Buckinghamshire
SL9 7EE United Kingdom
Home Voice: 01753 882573

It has disgusting interests:
http://tinyurl.com/cec2y
http://tinyurl.com/azbv3

It had one of the London Bombers working for it:

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article...693797,00.html

Sarah Balfour, head of Hillside Primary School, said today that staff and
pupils were "devastated" to discover that Khan was one of the bombers. In a
brief statement outside the school, she told reporters: "Sidique Khan was a
member of staff at Hillside Primary School and he was employed here between
March 2001 and December 2004 as a learning mentor.

"He was great with the children and they all loved him. He did so much for
them, helping and supporting them and running extra clubs and activities.
Sidique was a real asset to the school and always showed 100-per cent
commitment," Ms Balfour said.

This is what we are dealing with!

Now Mike can be embarrassed for what he "supports".

All I have to say is LMFAO...........You have so many friends.


wrote in message
. net...
On Tue, 8 Nov 2005 03:36:55 +0000, Jimbo wrote
(in article ):

I'm on the "gray" list? LMFAO

Yes. Mike Brannigan is logging your posts. He supports me 100%.


You have biggest most unwelcome presence of anyone on ms groups.

Says you.


You harass
people constantly

Er, I don't "harass" anyone. You harass me. If I constantly picked on the
same person over and over, ad nauseam et ad infinitum, then yes I would be
harassing whoever it was.

Suggest you avail yourself of a dictionary: -

harass verb (harasses, harassed, harassing) 1 to pester, torment or
trouble
someone by continually questioning or attacking them.

Which is exactly what you're doing to me.


and I wont stand for it. Every time you call someone a
name or insult their intelligence

I have insulted no-one's intelligence. Correcting someone's English usage
is
not "insulting their intelligence" - Ed does it too, but I don't see you
harassing him (to use your word). You, for example, need to acquaint
yourself with the apostrophe.


I will correct you and show what an utter
waste of time your presence is here.

I contribute. You do not. You harass. You are a troll. You are the
blueprint
of the 'Moral Crusade Troll' - defending Usenet from those you deem
"unfit",
inculpating them for your own egotistical ends. In reality, your "crusade"
is
pointless because you'll end up being kill-filed and/or reported and you
cannot continue a crusade without a soapbox, now can you...?


You can "forward" that to ms if you
like as I will "forward" your posts as well, we can see who's posts are
more
inflammatory, yours or mine.

Do make sense "see who is posts..." is what you've written. The word is
'whose' as in 'belonging to whom'.

It's got nothing to do with being inflammatory. I post to educate, not
inflame. You post to inflame, but you're no more irritating than a
mosquito
bite.

MS knows about you. My MS contact has seen my posts and doesn't appear to
think they're inflammatory. I did think I'd been blacklisted once, but it
turned out to be a problem with my news server.


" My advice, whilst
a little harsh I will admit, is never the less advice."

Well If I have different opinion on said advice I will voice that opinion
just as you post your advice. Got it?

You're a republican, aren't you...?



Where are all your allies and as I mentioned, have you received kudos for
your return? Nope.


How do you know? Can you see the contents of my inbox from there?

And, judging by the cursory Googling I've just done, I'm not the only one
who
thinks you're a waste of oxygen. A name for you - David Lipman. I know
David
(not well it has to be said) but I do know that it takes a lot to irritate
him and you *REALLY* ****ed in his coffee.

Now, you either quit trolling Usenet after me (actually just quit trolling
Usenet, full stop), or I take this further. A lot further.

Get it into whatever it is you have that passes for a brain that NO ONE'S
INTERESTED.

I have requested that Google remove the link you keep posting.

You have 24 hours. What you're doing isn't big, and it certainly isn't
clever. It's immature, juvenile and just plain childish.

Just to show there are no hard feelings, here's a little gift for you

http://tinyurl.com/9vq25

You HAND now...

"gnaynit" skrev i meddelandet
. ..


AKA
Snipped
It has disgusting interests:
http://tinyurl.com/cec2y
http://tinyurl.com/azbv3

It had one of the London Bombers working for it:

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article...693797,00.html

Snipped
This is what we are dealing with!

Now Mike can be embarrassed for what he "supports".

Now you did a stupidity as no one will take you serious after posting
personal info as you did.
There is one thing to not like what people are doing and pointing out their
fault but personal attacks is not doing any good.
Remember...being adequate is better than to perform a "manhunt".

Gunilla.

"You have 24 hours. What you're doing isn't big, and it ........."

OK. 24 hours are up.


wrote in message
. net...
On Tue, 8 Nov 2005 03:36:55 +0000, Jimbo wrote
(in article ):

I'm on the "gray" list? LMFAO

Yes. Mike Brannigan is logging your posts. He supports me 100%.


You have biggest most unwelcome presence of anyone on ms groups.

Says you.


You harass
people constantly

Er, I don't "harass" anyone. You harass me. If I constantly picked on the
same person over and over, ad nauseam et ad infinitum, then yes I would be
harassing whoever it was.

Suggest you avail yourself of a dictionary: -

harass verb (harasses, harassed, harassing) 1 to pester, torment or
trouble
someone by continually questioning or attacking them.

Which is exactly what you're doing to me.


and I wont stand for it. Every time you call someone a
name or insult their intelligence

I have insulted no-one's intelligence. Correcting someone's English usage
is
not "insulting their intelligence" - Ed does it too, but I don't see you
harassing him (to use your word). You, for example, need to acquaint
yourself with the apostrophe.


I will correct you and show what an utter
waste of time your presence is here.

I contribute. You do not. You harass. You are a troll. You are the
blueprint
of the 'Moral Crusade Troll' - defending Usenet from those you deem
"unfit",
inculpating them for your own egotistical ends. In reality, your "crusade"
is
pointless because you'll end up being kill-filed and/or reported and you
cannot continue a crusade without a soapbox, now can you...?


You can "forward" that to ms if you
like as I will "forward" your posts as well, we can see who's posts are
more
inflammatory, yours or mine.

Do make sense "see who is posts..." is what you've written. The word is
'whose' as in 'belonging to whom'.

It's got nothing to do with being inflammatory. I post to educate, not
inflame. You post to inflame, but you're no more irritating than a
mosquito
bite.

MS knows about you. My MS contact has seen my posts and doesn't appear to
think they're inflammatory. I did think I'd been blacklisted once, but it
turned out to be a problem with my news server.


" My advice, whilst
a little harsh I will admit, is never the less advice."

Well If I have different opinion on said advice I will voice that opinion
just as you post your advice. Got it?

You're a republican, aren't you...?



Where are all your allies and as I mentioned, have you received kudos for
your return? Nope.


How do you know? Can you see the contents of my inbox from there?

And, judging by the cursory Googling I've just done, I'm not the only one
who
thinks you're a waste of oxygen. A name for you - David Lipman. I know
David
(not well it has to be said) but I do know that it takes a lot to irritate
him and you *REALLY* ****ed in his coffee.

Now, you either quit trolling Usenet after me (actually just quit trolling
Usenet, full stop), or I take this further. A lot further.

Get it into whatever it is you have that passes for a brain that NO ONE'S
INTERESTED.

I have requested that Google remove the link you keep posting.

You have 24 hours. What you're doing isn't big, and it certainly isn't
clever. It's immature, juvenile and just plain childish.

Just to show there are no hard feelings, here's a little gift for you

http://tinyurl.com/9vq25

You HAND now...

On Fri, 11 Nov 2005 22:24:46 +0000, Jim wrote
(in article ):

I didn't think that was you since this woman has an actual job and works
with children. No one in their right mind would let someone like you work
with kids.

I was a LSA for 15 years before becoming ill.

Nice to see you've finally found your deodorant, Jim...

On Fri, 11 Nov 2005 23:17:05 +0000, wrote:

On Fri, 11 Nov 2005 22:24:46 +0000, Jim wrote
(in article ):

I didn't think that was you since this woman has an actual job and works
with children. No one in their right mind would let someone like you work
with kids.

That wasn't THIS Jim, Sarah - it was your stalker Jimbo.

Blessed be, for sure...