If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
I Need get work this formula
Best to you
I have this formulas : =AND(COUNT(B1;B3;B5)=1;COUNT(C1;C3;C3)=1;COUNT(D 1;D3;D5)=1;COUNT(E1;E3;E* 5)=1;COUNT(F1;F3;F5)=1) An perfect equivalent for this formula is the next array formula : =AND(MMULT(TRANSPOSE(ROW(B1:F5))^0,ISNUMBER(B1:F5) *{1;0;1;0;1})=1) in US formula sintax , and in my sintax : =AND(MMULT(TRANSPOSE(ROW(B1:F5))^0;ISNUMBER(B1:F5) *{1|0|1|0|1})=1) ________________________________________ Thanks to mr. Harlan Grove I get this formula , which mr. Harlan Grove said it is another perfect equivalet for the formulas above ; the new equivalent is : =AND(COUNT(MATCH(ROWS(B1:F5);TRANSPOSE({1;3;5}))= 1)) but this formula didn't work stil for me ; can anybody give me the changes in this last formula to get it work ? Thanks very much for your time and knowledge |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
I Need get work this formula
Any ideea here , please ? any sugestion is more then wellcome
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
I Need get work this formula
Can be some changes of functions in this formula to
calculate it faster by excel 2003 application ? Respectfully |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
I Need get work this formula
You have been trying to get a replacement formula for some time, and
Harlan Grove gave one to you, which you now find to be slower because it is an array formula. Can't you just accept that the one you started with is the optimum one? You never did explain why you had to have an alternative. Pete On Aug 1, 12:58*pm, ytayta555 wrote: Can be some changes of functions in this formula to calculate it faster by excel 2003 application ? Respectfully |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
I Need get work this formula
The first suggestion I will give you is that if you are replying to an
existing message you should quote enough of the existing message to put your reply into context. You may wish to read some of the advice available (either on the web or in newsgroups) for new users of newsgroups. -- David Biddulph "ytayta555" wrote in message ... Any ideea here , please ? any sugestion is more then wellcome |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
I Need get work this formula
On 1 Aug, 15:31, "David Biddulph" groups [at] biddulph.org.uk wrote:
The first suggestion I will give you is that if you are replying to an Thanks for very good sugestions ; to reply and to mr. Pete UK , it's a bit longer , but this day I'll explain why I had to have an alternative. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
I Need get work this formula
On 1 Aug, 15:23, Pete_UK wrote:
You have been trying to get a replacement formula for some time, and Harlan Grove gave one to you, which you now find to be slower because Thanks for reply ! I tryed now to get some last improvement in the formula , because I red here and have some ideas : http://www.decisionmodels.com/optspeedk.htm http://www.decisionmodels.com/optspeedj.htm |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|