If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
How do I receive an access database?
It is not the file size. Links to mdb files, akong with mdb, mde, and exe
attachments (and probably some others), are blocked by Exchange Server in my situation. So much for self-extracting zip files. "gls858" wrote in message ... BruceM wrote: I have only used recent versions of Outlook in conjunction with Exchange Server, and should have been clear on that point. I am a bit surprised that Outlook as a stand-alone program (on a home computer, for instance) blocks all programs of a certain type, no matter what. I will investigate further, but in any case thanks for the observation about the alternate zip utility (I have found, as have you, that .zip files have the same problems as the ..mdb files). "Cheese_whiz" wrote in message news From my understanding, Outlook blocks certain types of files (type 1) from being received. There is no control over those files (no settings within the Outlook client) UNLESS you are running exchange server and have access to the administrative settings to it. Lots of people might have "clients" and not be running their own exchange server or want to figure out who they need to talk to for autoriazation to change the security settings for the one(s) their company runs. I made the previous post because 1. the post prior to mine suggested zipping the file, but I've found that zip files didn't work (at least for me), and 2. I've recently addressed a set of circumstances that may very well be EXACTLY like the OP's (since he didn't give out details in terms of his situation). CW "BruceM" wrote: The issue is not that Outlook is the e-mail program, but rather the security settings that are applied at the administrative level. "BruceM" wrote: The issue is not that Outlook is the e-mail program, but rather the security settings that are applied at the administrative level. Adminstrators have been known to prefer the simple approach of assuming all files of a certain type are dangerous rather than going to the trouble of devising a solution. I had one security "professional" bluntly inform me (in reference to a Word form containing form fields) that "Macros are dangerous." Unfortunately, there's not much you can do when such "experts" have management's ear. "Cheese_whiz" wrote in message ... If you use outlook (on the receiving end), I think you'll have trouble even if you zip them. You can use .jar files (an alternative archive format) and you should be ok. If you need a program to create .jar files, try IZarc (google for it). I ran across it a year or so ago and have just stuck with it. Good luck, CW "Kevin3NF" wrote: The Access database is just a simple .mdb file. Find that, compress it using Winzip or similar tool, and email it if the size is acceptable. Otherwise, you may need to transfer via FTP. HTH, -- Kevin Hill 3NF Consulting http://www.3nf-inc.com/NewsGroups.htm http://kevin3nf.blogspot.com "rpsjn" wrote in message ... Need to get a database from a customer and would like them to email it to me is this possible? I had them try but I never received it. Thanks for any help. I receive database files all the time with Outlook 2003. No special settings. My guess is the file is to large. Some ISP's limit the size to as little a 2 megabytes. No notice, no bounce they just drop them. gls858 |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
How do I receive an access database?
I guess I understand the need. A lot of people just open any and all
attachments directly from the e-mail. I tried to e-mail some mde files after renaming them as txt files. The e-mail advised people (in all caps, no less) to read the directions before doing anything, and provided directions for copying and renaming the file, but sure enough several people told me that they had tried to open the file and saw only gibberish. Still, I wish there was an easier way than registry edits to accept responsibility for my own communications. "John Vinson" wrote in message ... On Mon, 30 Oct 2006 16:03:41 -0500, "BruceM" wrote: I am a bit surprised that Outlook as a stand-alone program (on a home computer, for instance) blocks all programs of a certain type, no matter what. Oh, it does indeed! :-{( You can get into the Registry Editor and override or change this behavior, if you're brave enough to (by analogy) tinker with the fuel injector controller of a car moving down the highway at full speed... well, it's not THAT bad but it's still risky. John W. Vinson[MVP] |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
How do I receive an access database?
John Vinson wrote:
You can get into the Registry Editor and override or change this behavior, if you're brave enough to (by analogy) tinker with the fuel injector controller of a car moving down the highway at full speed... well, it's not THAT bad but it's still risky. Or you can get an addin that does it for you: Outlook 2002, Outlook 2000 SP3 and Outlook 2003 Attachment Options http://www.slovaktech.com/attachmentoptions.htm -- Joan Wild Microsoft Access MVP |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
How do I receive an access database?
It's good to know about that. I've bookmarked the site. Thanks for the
link. "Joan Wild" wrote in message ... John Vinson wrote: You can get into the Registry Editor and override or change this behavior, if you're brave enough to (by analogy) tinker with the fuel injector controller of a car moving down the highway at full speed... well, it's not THAT bad but it's still risky. Or you can get an addin that does it for you: Outlook 2002, Outlook 2000 SP3 and Outlook 2003 Attachment Options http://www.slovaktech.com/attachmentoptions.htm -- Joan Wild Microsoft Access MVP |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
How do I receive an access database?
I'll have to give this one a try. I don't use Exchange Server and I was able
to receive .mdb files fine when I first set up Outlook 2003 on my computer about 8 months ago. What's changed? I expect some patch or update has changed things. When you have clients who only know computer basics, even getting them to send an attachment is a challenge. I'm not about to ask them to try and change the file ending or zip a file when they don't know what they're doing. Personally I think MS should get their act together on this one - why create a program and then block it for receiving via email if it's going to be a widely used program for service providers and their clients. There must surely be a work around for this???? Kathie Thomas "BruceM" wrote: It's good to know about that. I've bookmarked the site. Thanks for the link. "Joan Wild" wrote in message ... John Vinson wrote: You can get into the Registry Editor and override or change this behavior, if you're brave enough to (by analogy) tinker with the fuel injector controller of a car moving down the highway at full speed... well, it's not THAT bad but it's still risky. Or you can get an addin that does it for you: Outlook 2002, Outlook 2000 SP3 and Outlook 2003 Attachment Options http://www.slovaktech.com/attachmentoptions.htm -- Joan Wild Microsoft Access MVP |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
How do I receive an access database?
There must surely be a work around for this????
You mean other than the 2 that Joan suggested? -- Doug Steele, Microsoft Access MVP http://I.Am/DougSteele (no e-mails, please!) "kathiemt" wrote in message ... I'll have to give this one a try. I don't use Exchange Server and I was able to receive .mdb files fine when I first set up Outlook 2003 on my computer about 8 months ago. What's changed? I expect some patch or update has changed things. When you have clients who only know computer basics, even getting them to send an attachment is a challenge. I'm not about to ask them to try and change the file ending or zip a file when they don't know what they're doing. Personally I think MS should get their act together on this one - why create a program and then block it for receiving via email if it's going to be a widely used program for service providers and their clients. There must surely be a work around for this???? Kathie Thomas "BruceM" wrote: It's good to know about that. I've bookmarked the site. Thanks for the link. "Joan Wild" wrote in message ... John Vinson wrote: You can get into the Registry Editor and override or change this behavior, if you're brave enough to (by analogy) tinker with the fuel injector controller of a car moving down the highway at full speed... well, it's not THAT bad but it's still risky. Or you can get an addin that does it for you: Outlook 2002, Outlook 2000 SP3 and Outlook 2003 Attachment Options http://www.slovaktech.com/attachmentoptions.htm -- Joan Wild Microsoft Access MVP |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
How do I receive an access database?
"kathiemt" wrote in message
... I'll have to give this one a try. I don't use Exchange Server and I was able to receive .mdb files fine when I first set up Outlook 2003 on my computer about 8 months ago. What's changed? I expect some patch or update has changed things. That is exactly what happened. When you have clients who only know computer basics, even getting them to send an attachment is a challenge. I'm not about to ask them to try and change the file ending or zip a file when they don't know what they're doing. Personally I think MS should get their act together on this one - why create a program and then block it for receiving via email if it's going to be a widely used program for service providers and their clients. There must surely be a work around for this???? Read those two paragraphs again. It is precisely because of users who "don't know what they're doing" that blocking attachments was implemented. These are the users that would clickity-click on anything that comes in and then infest their computers with dear-knows-what. Then you'd be here complaining that MS isn't doing enough to protect users - they can't win. You have a number of options: 1. Have your users use a compression utility like WinZip or 'Compressed Folders' in Win XP to zip up the files. Consider this an opportunity to teach them something new. Afterall, they should be zipping up any files they send to anyone, not just to get past Outlook's blocking, but also as a courtesy to the email receiver. The attachment is much smaller; many ISPs limit the size of a single email that can be sent/received. 2. Don't send your files by email. It isn't that costly (perhaps even free) for you to set up a website where your clients can download/upload files. Or you can use something like http://www.yousendit.com/ 3. Use the addin that I linked to earlier. -- Joan Wild Microsoft Access MVP "Joan Wild" wrote in message ... Or you can get an addin that does it for you: Outlook 2002, Outlook 2000 SP3 and Outlook 2003 Attachment Options http://www.slovaktech.com/attachmentoptions.htm |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
How do I receive an access database?
Thanks for confirming that a patch/update was what changed things.
Yes, I know that people click on things they shouldn't. All I'm saying is that I feel there could be an additional Option in Tools in Outlook, so that users can elect to say 'yes, I do want to receive files of this type'. If it were buried inside advanced options of something it could still be found by those who need it. The client is remote, i.e. I'm not located anywhere near them so to try and explain how to use a zip program is a bit difficult, added to that their English is limited. I've installed the slovatech option and am hoping that will do the trick. "Joan Wild" wrote: "kathiemt" wrote in message ... I'll have to give this one a try. I don't use Exchange Server and I was able to receive .mdb files fine when I first set up Outlook 2003 on my computer about 8 months ago. What's changed? I expect some patch or update has changed things. That is exactly what happened. Read those two paragraphs again. It is precisely because of users who "don't know what they're doing" that blocking attachments was implemented. These are the users that would clickity-click on anything that comes in and then infest their computers with dear-knows-what. Then you'd be here complaining that MS isn't doing enough to protect users - they can't win. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|