If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
tabs, relationships and records in forms
Yeah I worked that out. Lucky I work in a lot of copy and paste so I worked
it out and worked around it. Ken do you think this is the best/easiest option to combine these types of data as I can see the need to do this for a number of my reports. Cathy "KenSheridan via AccessMonster.com" wrote: I see that I somehow managed to put "Pending" instead of "ANP", along with an extra quotes character in the last part of the UNION ALL operation. I hope it didn't confuse you too much. Ken Sheridan Stafford, England Cathydal wrote: Yay, thanks Ken, after a bit of shuffling, it worked! It's all taking shape. Cathy (Sorry I haven't responded to your email yet, have had my head down.) C :-) Cathy: [quoted text clipped - 77 lines] I wish you luck, but this Wednesday is just too soon. -- Message posted via AccessMonster.com http://www.accessmonster.com/Uwe/For...ccess/200906/1 |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
tabs, relationships and records in forms
Cathy:
With the tables structured in this way its probably the only option. What the UNION ALL operation does in essence is to produce a virtual result table in which the 'status' data is represented as values at column positions in rows, which is what the Information Principle requires, the data in this case being the constants. The best solution of course would be to have one table to start with rather than encoding the status data as the table names, but that would mean a substantial reengineering of your current model. Whether you want to go down that road is for you to decide. You may feel that you're in too deep to contemplate that, and I can understand why you might think that, but recasting the model is almost certainly not as big a task as you might think, provided you know how to use the tools available, which basically means writing 'action queries' along the lines of those in the demo file I mailed to you. From your perspective as a relative novice that might seem a big job; from mine as an old hand it doesn't look so scary. Ken Sheridan Stafford, England Cathydal wrote: Yeah I worked that out. Lucky I work in a lot of copy and paste so I worked it out and worked around it. Ken do you think this is the best/easiest option to combine these types of data as I can see the need to do this for a number of my reports. Cathy I see that I somehow managed to put "Pending" instead of "ANP", along with an extra quotes character in the last part of the UNION ALL operation. I hope [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] I wish you luck, but this Wednesday is just too soon. -- Message posted via AccessMonster.com http://www.accessmonster.com/Uwe/For...ccess/200906/1 |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
tabs, relationships and records in forms
Ken, I seem to have gotten into further strife! It seems that I cannot
update or edit my data, either through the form view or using tables - well I can add to the tables but none of the reports or queries are being modifed. From my research it seems to be the fault of union queries. If that is the case then this becomes a static database. A - is this correct? and B have you any suggestions on how to resolve this? Thanks ... desperately ... Cathy |
#34
|
|||
|
|||
tabs, relationships and records in forms
Cathydal,
Union queries are uneditable. They are great for reports but for forms, unless you are just displaying the data, they do not work for forms OR trying to edit the data in the query. -- Gina Whipp "I feel I have been denied critical, need to know, information!" - Tremors II http://www.regina-whipp.com/index_files/TipList.htm "Cathydal" wrote in message ... Ken, I seem to have gotten into further strife! It seems that I cannot update or edit my data, either through the form view or using tables - well I can add to the tables but none of the reports or queries are being modifed. From my research it seems to be the fault of union queries. If that is the case then this becomes a static database. A - is this correct? and B have you any suggestions on how to resolve this? Thanks ... desperately ... Cathy |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
tabs, relationships and records in forms
Cathydal,
I am going to restate what we have been saying along. You really need to consider 'redoing' your tables. An example of what happens when a database is not properly normalized is what you are experiencing now. As Ken said, we all know this may seem overwhelming but in the long run writing queries, creating forms for data entry and creating reports will be far easier and well worth the time. Access is unlike Excel or Word, it's not a learn as you go program. It has a steep learning curve which starts with understanding relational design. Here are some resources... Jeff Conrad's resources page: http://www.accessmvp.com/JConrad/acc...resources.html The Access Web resources page: http://www.mvps.org/access/resources/index.html A free tutorial written by Crystal (MS Access MVP): http://allenbrowne.com/casu-22.html MVP Allen Browne's tutorials: http://allenbrowne.com/links.html#Tutorials Think of it like building a house. You can't go hang dry wall if the foundation hasn't been laid; you can't hang light fixtures until the wiring has been put in... You are attempting to hang light fixtures the foundation is a bit wobbly! You need to go back to the tables (your foundation) and get them stable. -- Gina Whipp "I feel I have been denied critical, need to know, information!" - Tremors II http://www.regina-whipp.com/index_files/TipList.htm "Cathydal" wrote in message ... Ken, I seem to have gotten into further strife! It seems that I cannot update or edit my data, either through the form view or using tables - well I can add to the tables but none of the reports or queries are being modifed. From my research it seems to be the fault of union queries. If that is the case then this becomes a static database. A - is this correct? and B have you any suggestions on how to resolve this? Thanks ... desperately ... Cathy |
#36
|
|||
|
|||
tabs, relationships and records in forms
Cathy:
As you see, Gina has reinforced the advice I gave you in my reply to your email. Coming from such a highly respected regular contributor to the newsgroup you really would do best following her advice. Mine you can happily treat with contempt and derision of course G. Ken Sheridan Stafford, England Cathydal wrote: Ken, I seem to have gotten into further strife! It seems that I cannot update or edit my data, either through the form view or using tables - well I can add to the tables but none of the reports or queries are being modifed. From my research it seems to be the fault of union queries. If that is the case then this becomes a static database. A - is this correct? and B have you any suggestions on how to resolve this? Thanks ... desperately ... Cathy -- Message posted via http://www.accessmonster.com |
#37
|
|||
|
|||
tabs, relationships and records in forms
Ken,
Now that I finished laughing! Thank you... I only reinforced what you AND John have already said... sometimes, the third time is a charm! -- Gina Whipp "I feel I have been denied critical, need to know, information!" - Tremors II http://www.regina-whipp.com/index_files/TipList.htm "KenSheridan via AccessMonster.com" u51882@uwe wrote in message news:986e6c977b3df@uwe... Cathy: As you see, Gina has reinforced the advice I gave you in my reply to your email. Coming from such a highly respected regular contributor to the newsgroup you really would do best following her advice. Mine you can happily treat with contempt and derision of course G. Ken Sheridan Stafford, England Cathydal wrote: Ken, I seem to have gotten into further strife! It seems that I cannot update or edit my data, either through the form view or using tables - well I can add to the tables but none of the reports or queries are being modifed. From my research it seems to be the fault of union queries. If that is the case then this becomes a static database. A - is this correct? and B have you any suggestions on how to resolve this? Thanks ... desperately ... Cathy -- Message posted via http://www.accessmonster.com |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|