If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
can't use office 2007 trial / xp
This is related to, but not identical, other posts on this subject.
I have an old Dell Latitude D600, with a licensed copy of Office '03 on it. I downloaded a trial for Office Pro '07 and it immediately informed me that it had expired in 2002. Suggestions to others have been to remove all traces of earlier Office trials from the computer--but I obvsly don't want to delete my working copy of Office, which I may well decide to keep. (I'm curious about Office 2007 performance on this old machine.) how to make the trial work? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
can't use office 2007 trial / xp
CShea wrote:
This is related to, but not identical, other posts on this subject. I have an old Dell Latitude D600, with a licensed copy of Office '03 on it. I downloaded a trial for Office Pro '07 and it immediately informed me that it had expired in 2002. Suggestions to others have been to remove all traces of earlier Office trials from the computer--but I obvsly don't want to delete my working copy of Office, which I may well decide to keep. (I'm curious about Office 2007 performance on this old machine.) how to make the trial work? An insider at Microsoft UK has told me that Trial versions of Office 2007 are not supposed to be on Microsoft Website because they want everybody to start using Office 2010 Beta. I am also curious as to why XP is giving you the problem because this problem is only applicable on Windows 7 system. Are you sure you don't have any compatibility packs for Office 2007 on the system? hth -- THE INFORMATION IS PROVIDED "AS IS" WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND. LD55ZRA DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES, EITHER EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. IN NO EVENT SHALL LD55ZRA OR ITS ASSOCIATES BE LIABLE FOR ANY DAMAGES WHATSOEVER INCLUDING DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, LOSS OF BUSINESS PROFITS OR SPECIAL DAMAGES, EVEN IF LD55ZRA OR ITS ASSOCIATES HAVE BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES. SOME STATES DO NOT ALLOW THE EXCLUSION OR LIMITATION OF LIABILITY FOR CONSEQUENTIAL OR INCIDENTAL DAMAGES SO THE FOREGOING LIMITATION MAY NOT APPLY. Copyright LD55ZRA 2010. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
can't use office 2007 trial / xp
"CShea" wrote in message ... This is related to, but not identical, other posts on this subject. I have an old Dell Latitude D600, with a licensed copy of Office '03 on it. I downloaded a trial for Office Pro '07 and it immediately informed me that it had expired in 2002. Suggestions to others have been to remove all traces of earlier Office trials from the computer--but I obvsly don't want to delete my working copy of Office, which I may well decide to keep. (I'm curious about Office 2007 performance on this old machine.) how to make the trial work? It doesn't work until you remove the old version of Office. My two cents on the upgrade, don't do it. I used Office 07 and did not like it at all. If I had a job that required me to use it, then I'd be able to figure it out, but since I can do what I want wneh I want, I have no interest in trying to figure out where they moved everything. You may want to look at the System Requirements for Office '07 to be sure that your old Dell will support it. If it's too old, '07 will not run on it anyhow. If '07 will run on your Dell, then you have to uninstall '03 to install '07. If you don't like '07, then you have to uninstall it before you can go back to '03, and you must have the '03 CDs to do the reinstall. AND if your copy of Office '03 is an Upgrade Version, then you must retain access to the qualitfied basis for an upgrade -- you have to read the list of qualified basis products that's on the box the upgrade comes in. After all of that, you need the Product Key for your copy of Office '03 if you want to reinstall it. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
can't use office 2007 trial / xp
"LD55ZRA" wrote in message ... CShea wrote: This is related to, but not identical, other posts on this subject. I have an old Dell Latitude D600, with a licensed copy of Office '03 on it. I downloaded a trial for Office Pro '07 and it immediately informed me that it had expired in 2002. Suggestions to others have been to remove all traces of earlier Office trials from the computer--but I obvsly don't want to delete my working copy of Office, which I may well decide to keep. (I'm curious about Office 2007 performance on this old machine.) how to make the trial work? An insider at Microsoft UK has told me that Trial versions of Office 2007 are not supposed to be on Microsoft Website because they want everybody to start using Office 2010 Beta. I am also curious as to why XP is giving you the problem because this problem is only applicable on Windows 7 system. Are you sure you don't have any compatibility packs for Office 2007 on the system? hth -- THE INFORMATION IS PROVIDED "AS IS" WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND. LD55ZRA DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES, EITHER EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. IN NO EVENT SHALL LD55ZRA OR ITS ASSOCIATES BE LIABLE FOR ANY DAMAGES WHATSOEVER INCLUDING DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, LOSS OF BUSINESS PROFITS OR SPECIAL DAMAGES, EVEN IF LD55ZRA OR ITS ASSOCIATES HAVE BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES. SOME STATES DO NOT ALLOW THE EXCLUSION OR LIMITATION OF LIABILITY FOR CONSEQUENTIAL OR INCIDENTAL DAMAGES SO THE FOREGOING LIMITATION MAY NOT APPLY. Copyright LD55ZRA 2010. I would be surprised if that insider is correct. There is a big difference between a trial and a beta. A trial product is supposed to be stable and can be used in production environment. A beta product is 'allowed' to be unstable and should not be used in a production environment. Yves |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
can't use office 2007 trial / xp
Yves Dhondt wrote:
I would be surprised if that insider is correct. There is a big difference between a trial and a beta. A trial product is supposed to be stable and can be used in production environment. A beta product is 'allowed' to be unstable and should not be used in a production environment. Yves You seem to know very little about trial versions? Trial versions are the "final" beta versions which are sometimes sold in shops to cover the cost of development. There is absolutely no guarantee that trial versions will be stable in any shape or form because they are given out for people to know what a product can do for them. They cannot be relied upon to be stable. That is why hackers and crackers tend to go for these to "reverse engineer" these programs because they are easy to crack and the security is pretty much amateurish! I hope this clarifies any doubts you may have had. hth -- THE INFORMATION IS PROVIDED "AS IS" WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND. LD55ZRA DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES, EITHER EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. IN NO EVENT SHALL LD55ZRA OR ITS ASSOCIATES BE LIABLE FOR ANY DAMAGES WHATSOEVER INCLUDING DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, LOSS OF BUSINESS PROFITS OR SPECIAL DAMAGES, EVEN IF LD55ZRA OR ITS ASSOCIATES HAVE BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES. SOME STATES DO NOT ALLOW THE EXCLUSION OR LIMITATION OF LIABILITY FOR CONSEQUENTIAL OR INCIDENTAL DAMAGES SO THE FOREGOING LIMITATION MAY NOT APPLY. Copyright LD55ZRA 2010. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
can't use office 2007 trial / xp
"LD55ZRA" wrote in message ... Yves Dhondt wrote: I would be surprised if that insider is correct. There is a big difference between a trial and a beta. A trial product is supposed to be stable and can be used in production environment. A beta product is 'allowed' to be unstable and should not be used in a production environment. Yves You seem to know very little about trial versions? Trial versions are the "final" beta versions which are sometimes sold in shops to cover the cost of development. There is absolutely no guarantee that trial versions will be stable in any shape or form because they are given out for people to know what a product can do for them. They cannot be relied upon to be stable. That is why hackers and crackers tend to go for these to "reverse engineer" these programs because they are easy to crack and the security is pretty much amateurish! I hope this clarifies any doubts you may have had. hth -- THE INFORMATION IS PROVIDED "AS IS" WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND. LD55ZRA DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES, EITHER EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. IN NO EVENT SHALL LD55ZRA OR ITS ASSOCIATES BE LIABLE FOR ANY DAMAGES WHATSOEVER INCLUDING DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, LOSS OF BUSINESS PROFITS OR SPECIAL DAMAGES, EVEN IF LD55ZRA OR ITS ASSOCIATES HAVE BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES. SOME STATES DO NOT ALLOW THE EXCLUSION OR LIMITATION OF LIABILITY FOR CONSEQUENTIAL OR INCIDENTAL DAMAGES SO THE FOREGOING LIMITATION MAY NOT APPLY. Copyright LD55ZRA 2010. That is untrue. A normal complete software development cycle is: pre-alpha alpha beta (private/public) release candidates (private/public) final trial/demo Smaller programs will not always cover all these steps. Anyway, the reason 'why hackers and crackers tend to go for these to "reverse engineer" these programs' is because trials/demos contain all the functionality in the code. Some functionality is just not accessible in the trial/demo or the use is limited in time. As all the functionality is in the code, all your 'hackers and crackers' have to do is remove the limitations to get full working versions. If the product would be a beta, they would have to fix the program rather than circumvent the security... If the latter were the case, they would be better of writing the program themselves :-) If a beta version of your software crashes whenever I use it, I would still be inclined to try your final product if it contains some 'must have' features. However, if the trial version of your software crashes whenever I use it, I would never buy your product, no matter how good the promised features are. Yves |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
can't use office 2007 trial / xp
Yves Dhondt wrote: That is untrue. A normal complete software development cycle is: pre-alpha alpha beta (private/public) release candidates (private/public) final trial/demo Smaller programs will not always cover all these steps. Anyway, the reason 'why hackers and crackers tend to go for these to "reverse engineer" these programs' is because trials/demos contain all the functionality in the code. Some functionality is just not accessible in the trial/demo or the use is limited in time. As all the functionality is in the code, all your 'hackers and crackers' have to do is remove the limitations to get full working versions. If the product would be a beta, they would have to fix the program rather than circumvent the security... If the latter were the case, they would be better of writing the program themselves :-) If a beta version of your software crashes whenever I use it, I would still be inclined to try your final product if it contains some 'must have' features. However, if the trial version of your software crashes whenever I use it, I would never buy your product, no matter how good the promised features are. Yves Are you seriously trying to tell us that final products don't crash? Also, why did microsoft release 142 patches for Windows 7 in a such a short period? This is because Win7 in the shops was a beta version rebranded as released version. I know this because I have worked for Microsoft UK and I am still in contact with people I used to work with. I have nothing else to say on this matter. hth -- THE INFORMATION IS PROVIDED "AS IS" WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND. LD55ZRA DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES, EITHER EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. IN NO EVENT SHALL LD55ZRA OR ITS ASSOCIATES BE LIABLE FOR ANY DAMAGES WHATSOEVER INCLUDING DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, LOSS OF BUSINESS PROFITS OR SPECIAL DAMAGES, EVEN IF LD55ZRA OR ITS ASSOCIATES HAVE BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES. SOME STATES DO NOT ALLOW THE EXCLUSION OR LIMITATION OF LIABILITY FOR CONSEQUENTIAL OR INCIDENTAL DAMAGES SO THE FOREGOING LIMITATION MAY NOT APPLY. Copyright LD55ZRA 2010. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
can't use office 2007 trial / xp
"LD55ZRA" wrote in message .. . Yves Dhondt wrote: That is untrue. A normal complete software development cycle is: pre-alpha alpha beta (private/public) release candidates (private/public) final trial/demo Smaller programs will not always cover all these steps. Anyway, the reason 'why hackers and crackers tend to go for these to "reverse engineer" these programs' is because trials/demos contain all the functionality in the code. Some functionality is just not accessible in the trial/demo or the use is limited in time. As all the functionality is in the code, all your 'hackers and crackers' have to do is remove the limitations to get full working versions. If the product would be a beta, they would have to fix the program rather than circumvent the security... If the latter were the case, they would be better of writing the program themselves :-) If a beta version of your software crashes whenever I use it, I would still be inclined to try your final product if it contains some 'must have' features. However, if the trial version of your software crashes whenever I use it, I would never buy your product, no matter how good the promised features are. Yves Are you seriously trying to tell us that final products don't crash? Also, why did microsoft release 142 patches for Windows 7 in a such a short period? This is because Win7 in the shops was a beta version rebranded as released version. I know this because I have worked for Microsoft UK and I am still in contact with people I used to work with. I have nothing else to say on this matter. hth -- THE INFORMATION IS PROVIDED "AS IS" WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND. LD55ZRA DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES, EITHER EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. IN NO EVENT SHALL LD55ZRA OR ITS ASSOCIATES BE LIABLE FOR ANY DAMAGES WHATSOEVER INCLUDING DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, LOSS OF BUSINESS PROFITS OR SPECIAL DAMAGES, EVEN IF LD55ZRA OR ITS ASSOCIATES HAVE BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES. SOME STATES DO NOT ALLOW THE EXCLUSION OR LIMITATION OF LIABILITY FOR CONSEQUENTIAL OR INCIDENTAL DAMAGES SO THE FOREGOING LIMITATION MAY NOT APPLY. Copyright LD55ZRA 2010. Basically you are saying, Microsoft released a 'beta', then they made a 'release candidate' that fixed a number of the 'beta' issues, and then they decided to bring out that earlier 'beta' as a final product. At least say they rebranded a 'release candidate' as the final 'release'. I doubt that is the case, but it is possible, after all, the name 'release candidate' means that it could be final. Yves |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
can't use office 2007 trial / xp
Yves Dhondt wrote:
Basically you are saying, Microsoft released a 'beta', then they made a 'release candidate' that fixed a number of the 'beta' issues, and then they decided to bring out that earlier 'beta' as a final product. You got it at last my dear good friend! At least say they rebranded a 'release candidate' as the final 'release'. I doubt that is the case, but it is possible, after all, the name 'release candidate' means that it could be final. Well such information is normally a commercial secret and the only way to know is to compare the beta version and the so called final" RC by listing the files and size of each files. I did that for Windows 7 and the Beta version I had and the final RC version were almost identical. The only difference was in the setup.exe file but I expected that because they had to tighten up on security of serial numbers and activation code. With Win7 the activation code has changed completely. With OEM versions (I had Dell branded DVD) the dates have changed but the size of the files is still the same. HP refused to supply me with their re-installation DVD saying they are not allowed to under their new license terms with M$. They only gave me a CD that can reset the system to factory settings with it. I generally like to have an actual re-installation CD/DVD of the OS because I control everything what is installed on my system. Yves -- THE INFORMATION IS PROVIDED "AS IS" WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND. LD55ZRA DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES, EITHER EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. IN NO EVENT SHALL LD55ZRA OR ITS ASSOCIATES BE LIABLE FOR ANY DAMAGES WHATSOEVER INCLUDING DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, LOSS OF BUSINESS PROFITS OR SPECIAL DAMAGES, EVEN IF LD55ZRA OR ITS ASSOCIATES HAVE BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES. SOME STATES DO NOT ALLOW THE EXCLUSION OR LIMITATION OF LIABILITY FOR CONSEQUENTIAL OR INCIDENTAL DAMAGES SO THE FOREGOING LIMITATION MAY NOT APPLY. Copyright LD55ZRA 2010. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
can't use office 2007 trial / xp
Yves
A normal complete software development cycle is: pre-alpha alpha beta (private/public) release candidates (private/public) final trial/demo You are correct .Yes that is the order and it always was and will be. I have learned to ignore LD55ZRA because on occasions he is way off with his answers as he is here -- Peter Please Reply to Newsgroup for the benefit of others Requests for assistance by email can not and will not be acknowledged. "Yves Dhondt" wrote in message ... "LD55ZRA" wrote in message .. . Yves Dhondt wrote: That is untrue. A normal complete software development cycle is: pre-alpha alpha beta (private/public) release candidates (private/public) final trial/demo Smaller programs will not always cover all these steps. Anyway, the reason 'why hackers and crackers tend to go for these to "reverse engineer" these programs' is because trials/demos contain all the functionality in the code. Some functionality is just not accessible in the trial/demo or the use is limited in time. As all the functionality is in the code, all your 'hackers and crackers' have to do is remove the limitations to get full working versions. If the product would be a beta, they would have to fix the program rather than circumvent the security... If the latter were the case, they would be better of writing the program themselves :-) If a beta version of your software crashes whenever I use it, I would still be inclined to try your final product if it contains some 'must have' features. However, if the trial version of your software crashes whenever I use it, I would never buy your product, no matter how good the promised features are. Yves Are you seriously trying to tell us that final products don't crash? Also, why did microsoft release 142 patches for Windows 7 in a such a short period? This is because Win7 in the shops was a beta version rebranded as released version. I know this because I have worked for Microsoft UK and I am still in contact with people I used to work with. I have nothing else to say on this matter. hth -- THE INFORMATION IS PROVIDED "AS IS" WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND. LD55ZRA DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES, EITHER EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. IN NO EVENT SHALL LD55ZRA OR ITS ASSOCIATES BE LIABLE FOR ANY DAMAGES WHATSOEVER INCLUDING DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, LOSS OF BUSINESS PROFITS OR SPECIAL DAMAGES, EVEN IF LD55ZRA OR ITS ASSOCIATES HAVE BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES. SOME STATES DO NOT ALLOW THE EXCLUSION OR LIMITATION OF LIABILITY FOR CONSEQUENTIAL OR INCIDENTAL DAMAGES SO THE FOREGOING LIMITATION MAY NOT APPLY. Copyright LD55ZRA 2010. Basically you are saying, Microsoft released a 'beta', then they made a 'release candidate' that fixed a number of the 'beta' issues, and then they decided to bring out that earlier 'beta' as a final product. At least say they rebranded a 'release candidate' as the final 'release'. I doubt that is the case, but it is possible, after all, the name 'release candidate' means that it could be final. Yves |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|