If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Office 2000 to Office 2003 upgrade value
Our environment of 300+ users is standardized on Windows 2000 Pro and
Office 2000 Pro. Few of the office users are "power users." Most use Word and Excel with a number of them using Access. However, the larger Access databases are being converted to SQL Server. We have already migrated from Outlook 2000 to Oulook 2003 and are running Exchange 2003 on a Windows Server 2003 platform in a Windows Server 2003 Domain Controller environment. Most other file and print servers run on Windows 2000 server. A question has been presented regarding an upgrade of the Office suite from Office 2000 Pro to Office 2003 Pro in the next year. Is this a justifiable move? Can it be justified based on ROI? The licensing costs are not trivial, we are looking at a quarter of a million dollars over a three year span for the Office upgrade. At some point in the next 2 - 3 years we will be upgrading workstation hardware and the new workstations would include whatever the "current" office suite is. Current hardware performance is acceptable. I know that an upgrade includes costs that extend beyond the product/license price - costs like deployment, user training and hand-holding, document compatibility, etc. Have any of you faced this question? How have you handled it, valued it, etc. Thanks in advance for your help. ChiefDarkCloud (Please reply to the group, not to me.) |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
If you already upgraded to Outlook 2003 (presumably with your Exchange 2003
upgrade), you would do well to upgrade the rest of Office. Many automation functions require the same versions of Outlook and Office, such as mail merges, send to from Office applications, etc. -- Milly Staples [MVP - Outlook] Post all replies to the group to keep the discussion intact. Due to the (insert latest virus name here) virus, all mail sent to my personal account will be deleted without reading. After searching google.groups.com and finding no answer, ChiefDarkCloud asked: | Our environment of 300+ users is standardized on Windows 2000 Pro and | Office 2000 Pro. Few of the office users are "power users." Most use | Word and Excel with a number of them using Access. However, the | larger Access databases are being converted to SQL Server. | | We have already migrated from Outlook 2000 to Oulook 2003 and are | running Exchange 2003 on a Windows Server 2003 platform in a Windows | Server 2003 Domain Controller environment. Most other file and print | servers run on Windows 2000 server. | | A question has been presented regarding an upgrade of the Office suite | from Office 2000 Pro to Office 2003 Pro in the next year. Is this a | justifiable move? Can it be justified based on ROI? The licensing | costs are not trivial, we are looking at a quarter of a million | dollars over a three year span for the Office upgrade. At some point | in the next 2 - 3 years we will be upgrading workstation hardware and | the new workstations would include whatever the "current" office suite | is. Current hardware performance is acceptable. | | I know that an upgrade includes costs that extend beyond the | product/license price - costs like deployment, user training and | hand-holding, document compatibility, etc. | | Have any of you faced this question? How have you handled it, valued | it, etc. | | Thanks in advance for your help. | | ChiefDarkCloud | | (Please reply to the group, not to me.) |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Milly - could you point to a resource which describes/defines this,
please? We have been running Outlook 2003 with Office 2000 Professional SR1 for a month or better and I have not heard any wailing or gnashing of teeth over lost functionality. Of course, maybe said functionality has not been stressed tested in our environment yet. Thanks. ChiefDarkCloud "Milly Staples [MVP - Outlook]" wrote in message ... If you already upgraded to Outlook 2003 (presumably with your Exchange 2003 upgrade), you would do well to upgrade the rest of Office. Many automation functions require the same versions of Outlook and Office, such as mail merges, send to from Office applications, etc. -- Milly Staples [MVP - Outlook] [snip] |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Will I lose Access 2002 if I install Office 2003 | Mark | Setup, Installing & Configuration | 5 | September 1st, 2004 05:51 PM |
Continual Error 1321 Trying to Install Office 2003 | Chad Harris | General Discussions | 9 | June 11th, 2004 08:19 AM |
Error #1321 MOS 2003 Setup | Chad Harris | Setup, Installing & Configuration | 1 | June 7th, 2004 12:22 AM |
Productkey problem when installing office 2003 on network | Stefan Schreurs | Setup, Installing & Configuration | 1 | June 1st, 2004 11:16 PM |
MSI installer runs when I run Office 2003 app | Ralph Sharett | Setup, Installing & Configuration | 1 | May 27th, 2004 07:58 AM |