If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
are you reall not getting it? *OE* is the application im talking about. of
course yEnc isnt an app.... im saying, pretty clearly, that if MS doesnt cater its app to its customers (read: enable yenc decoding), then they lose the customer. yeah, its a free app. as is IE. but youre a fool if you think that means they dont care about having the highest user base. lets make it real simple for you: yenc is to OE as directX CSS filters are to IE -- not standardized, but something people like to use. deal. "Vanguard" wrote: "matt del vecchio" wrote in message ... [righteous blah blah blah deleted] ...news flash: porn is a legitmate function for a newsreader. since when is its MS concern *what* you do w/ their clients? do they care that you use MS to view porn when the missus is away? no. do they care that who you send email to or what you say? no. get real. as i said in another thread: an application provider writes apps to make their customers happy. if they cant/dont/wont, then thats fine. thats also when their customers leave them for another product. eos. get a job in application development and youll figure this out one day. as for the rest of your CDO crap, no idea what youre talking about. i came to the forums here what surfing the MS site and thought id post something. for my porn-loving newsgroup needs, i use a Xnews, a newsreader client. yEnc is an encoding scheme, not a particular application. Anyone can write an application that can support the yEnc encoding scheme (what did you think "Enc" stood for in its name?), as is proven by the usurper author writing applications, others writing proxies (yep, you could use one and that'll get you all that porn you miss when using OE), and still others writing newsreaders that incorporate yEnc. Per your own argument, if users want a feature that is available is some other application but not in another, they'll go use that other application. I'm sure Microsoft is unconcerned about their corporate customers leaving Outlook because they can't get their porn at work (if they manage to retain their employement) or from all that lost revenue by not including yEnc in their FREE Outlook Express. -- __________________________________________________ __________ Post your replies to the newsgroup. Share with others. E-mail reply: Remove "NIXTHIS" and add "#VS811" to Subject. __________________________________________________ __________ |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Uh, who is "talking righteous"?
the "you just want to use it for PORN!" crusaders. the implication being, of course, that easier downloads of porn are not a legitimate reason to improve the product. Why would they add a protocol which would bypass DRM? not following here. i am not aware of any DRM in MIME, are you? do fill me in if im missing something. Porn isn't the issue. MSFT makes a half-hearted pass at adhering to what the IETF has set as a standard. The last time I checked, yEnc was not an IETF oh yes youre right -- MS is *all* about developing its applications around agreed upon standards. give me a break man! have you had your head in the sand during the entire IE debacle! MS is *king* of implementing proprietary, non-standardized features/support. especially the HTML and CSS realm! i cant tell you how many devs have loudly voiced their wish that MS would make IE7 more standards-complient (good the Acid2 browser test). but that isnt MS' bag and we all know it. so no, i dont buy that as a valid reason for why MS has lost touch on binary support. i also contest the notion that "most people" (people, in this sense, being binary newsgroup consumers of course) have never heard of yEnc. if you are referring to the entire world population tho, sure. but in the context of our discussion? no way. matt supported standard. yEnc appears to be one of those niche thingys which are unknown to a vast majority of people; yet those who need it generally know where to find it. I expect that MSFT will adopt it as soon after the IETF does as possible. -- Norman ~Win dain a lotica, En vai tu ri, Si lo ta ~Fin dein a loluca, En dragu a sei lain ~Vi fa-ru les shutai am, En riga-lint |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Besides, they don't make one penny off OE.
gee, for an MS-MVP you dont seem very bright. do they make a "penny" off IE? not up front, no, neither have pricetags. then why all the hoopla, what the desire to break laws in order to gain market domination? thats for another thread. but rest assured, it *is* in MS' best interest to have as many "customers" using their product over a competitors as possible. carry on. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
tell you how many devs have loudly voiced their wish that MS would make IE7 more standards-complient (good the Acid2 browser test). but that isnt MS' bag err, "google" the Acid2 browser test. matt |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
"matt del vecchio" wrote in
message ... are you reall not getting it? *OE* is the application im talking about. of course yEnc isnt an app.... im saying, pretty clearly, that if MS doesnt cater its app to its customers (read: enable yenc decoding), then they lose the customer. And like *I* said, I'm sure Microsoft isn't concerned about losing revenue on their FREE - that's **F..R..E..E** - Outlook Express e-mail client. I code a product. I put it on my web site. I charge NOTHING for it. You download a copy. How much did I make? NOTHING. You download a copy. How much did I make. NOTHING. Do I care if I lose you as a customer? How the hell would I know you were a customer? You obviously don't need to register the product and you don't need to create an account to get the product. Microsoft may actually like to lose customers so they could get rid of the product. When the rumor started that Microsoft was discontinuing Outlook Express, there was a big uproar from the user community whereupon Microsoft announced that it was not dropping OE. Microsoft isn't going to lose any customers due to lack of yEnc. How could it? OE didn't have yEnc before so not having it won't make any of those OE customers abandon that product for something they didn't have before. -- __________________________________________________ __________ Post your replies to the newsgroup. Share with others. E-mail reply: Remove "NIXTHIS" and add "#VS811" to Subject. __________________________________________________ __________ |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Get yourself a news program that supports yEnc. It won't be OE.
as should be patently clear to anyone capable of reading english, i have. the point of my whole forray into this boring ass group, is that OE should get with the needs of its customers and support an aspect of its app that is quite lacking. really, can you imagine such silliness in a photoshop group, over .PICT support! get real.... you people need girlfriends. seriously. matt |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
In ,
matt del vecchio did some thinking and came up with these words: Get yourself a news program that supports yEnc. It won't be OE. as should be patently clear to anyone capable of reading english, i have. the point of my whole forray into this boring ass group, is that OE should get with the needs of its customers and support an aspect of its app that is quite lacking. really, can you imagine such silliness in a photoshop group, over .PICT support! get real.... you people need girlfriends. seriously. matt While I agree with your logic in a sense - OE and the rest of MS products are the results of the needs of "the many" instead of "the few." While yEnc has collected a wide following, it has still not become a driving force and as such won't drive itself into OE. It's hard enough to get the OE team to deal with glaring deficiencies, much less support for an app that is more *underground* than mainstream. You can always click on Help - Microsoft on the Web - Send feedback to give them your vote towards the addition of this support. -- Ron Bogart {} ô¿ô¬ Associate Expert Expert Zone - www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/expertzone Lovin life on Mercer Island 8^) "Life is what happens while we are making other plans." http://www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/e...ts/nichol.mspx In memory of a true friend, MVP Alex Nichol (1935-2005) |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
"matt del vecchio" wrote in
message ... Get yourself a news program that supports yEnc. It won't be OE. as should be patently clear to anyone capable of reading english, i have. the point of my whole forray into this boring ass group, is that OE should get with the needs of its customers and support an aspect of its app that is quite lacking. really, can you imagine such silliness in a photoshop group, over .PICT support! get real.... you people need girlfriends. seriously. matt It does meet the needs of its users. News flash: YOU are not its only user. If OE didn't meet the needs of its users then its users wouldn't be using it. DUH! Oh, and there are graphic programs that do NOT support every graphics file format that has ever existed on this planet. And guess what those users had to do? Use another product to support that other graphics format. DUH! You are getting berated because all you've done so far is whine and complain about a product that doesn't support something YOU want in the product. I use multiple newsreaders depending on what function I want from each. OE is lousy as an offline reader and I'd rather use Newrover for that. I may replace OE with Xnews to get far superior regular expressions and the ability to search in ANY header and also let you define which headers are displayed in the preview pane so, for example, you can get alerted when some clown uses FollowUp-To in an attempt to redirect your reply to some other newsgroup than where you intended to post. Some folks use Newsbin because they only want to strip out all the files attached in some binary newsgroup (it's been about 3, or more years since I looked at Newsbin and decided binaries weren't where I wanted to spend my time, so there might be better automatic scanning and file extracting newsreaders out there by now). Instead of using OE to waste time to read a music group trying to find songs or a group like alt.comp.graphics to yank images, they use Newsbin or a similarly functioned newsreader to yank all the posts with attachments to yank and save all that match whatever filetype(s) they want. Get a newsreader that satisfies your needs. You have LOTS of choices. When Microsoft perceives a *significant* number of users want yEnc, and when yEnc actually has a stable encoding definition which is no longer non-compliant with other Usenet standards (like trying to use the unstructured Subject header as a structured header to encode the encoded section within the body), then you'll see Microsoft bothering with it. I forget which one it was, but one newsreader author got so ****ed at the yEnc author continually tweaking and changing the encoding scheme that they dumped support for yEnc. -- __________________________________________________ __________ Post your replies to the newsgroup. Share with others. E-mail reply: Remove "NIXTHIS" and add "#VS811" to Subject. __________________________________________________ __________ |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
like i said elsewhere in this thread....pasted for your convienence:
Besides, they don't make one penny off OE. gee, for an MS-MVP you dont seem very bright. do they make a "penny" off IE? not up front, no, neither have pricetags. then why all the hoopla, what the desire to break laws in order to gain market domination? thats for another thread. but rest assured, it *is* in MS' best interest to have as many "customers" using their product over a competitors as possible. [its about the tie ins, foo.] carry on. "Vanguard" wrote: "matt del vecchio" wrote in message ... are you reall not getting it? *OE* is the application im talking about. of course yEnc isnt an app.... im saying, pretty clearly, that if MS doesnt cater its app to its customers (read: enable yenc decoding), then they lose the customer. And like *I* said, I'm sure Microsoft isn't concerned about losing revenue on their FREE - that's **F..R..E..E** - Outlook Express e-mail client. I code a product. I put it on my web site. I charge NOTHING for it. You download a copy. How much did I make? NOTHING. You download a copy. How much did I make. NOTHING. Do I care if I lose you as a customer? How the hell would I know you were a customer? You obviously don't need to register the product and you don't need to create an account to get the product. Microsoft may actually like to lose customers so they could get rid of the product. When the rumor started that Microsoft was discontinuing Outlook Express, there was a big uproar from the user community whereupon Microsoft announced that it was not dropping OE. Microsoft isn't going to lose any customers due to lack of yEnc. How could it? OE didn't have yEnc before so not having it won't make any of those OE customers abandon that product for something they didn't have before. -- __________________________________________________ __________ Post your replies to the newsgroup. Share with others. E-mail reply: Remove "NIXTHIS" and add "#VS811" to Subject. __________________________________________________ __________ |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
finally! somebody whos able to take his lips off the great MS, ah, glass of
koolaid... well said. ill do that. "Ron Bogart" wrote: In , matt del vecchio did some thinking and came up with these words: Get yourself a news program that supports yEnc. It won't be OE. as should be patently clear to anyone capable of reading english, i have. the point of my whole forray into this boring ass group, is that OE should get with the needs of its customers and support an aspect of its app that is quite lacking. really, can you imagine such silliness in a photoshop group, over .PICT support! get real.... you people need girlfriends. seriously. matt While I agree with your logic in a sense - OE and the rest of MS products are the results of the needs of "the many" instead of "the few." While yEnc has collected a wide following, it has still not become a driving force and as such won't drive itself into OE. It's hard enough to get the OE team to deal with glaring deficiencies, much less support for an app that is more *underground* than mainstream. You can always click on Help - Microsoft on the Web - Send feedback to give them your vote towards the addition of this support. -- Ron Bogart {} ô¿ô¬ Associate Expert Expert Zone - www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/expertzone Lovin life on Mercer Island 8^) "Life is what happens while we are making other plans." http://www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/e...ts/nichol.mspx In memory of a true friend, MVP Alex Nichol (1935-2005) |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Addresses - backup | Lewis Shanks | Setup, Installing & Configuration | 3 | June 3rd, 2005 05:41 PM |
Outlook 2003 Multiple Archive .PST Files | Mike | General Discussion | 0 | April 20th, 2005 01:25 AM |
Managing PST/OST files | Michael S | Installation & Setup | 1 | December 21st, 2004 07:36 PM |
Disappeared e-mails in OE6... | Timur Abdullin | Outlook Express | 22 | July 11th, 2004 06:31 PM |
mp3 files on the web | tomwalshco | Powerpoint | 3 | June 23rd, 2004 12:05 AM |