A Microsoft Office (Excel, Word) forum. OfficeFrustration

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » OfficeFrustration forum » Microsoft Access » General Discussion
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read  

SQL Server or Sharepoint?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old July 9th, 2009, 05:59 AM posted to microsoft.public.access
John W. Vinson
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 18,261
Default SQL Server or Sharepoint?

On Wed, 8 Jul 2009 19:40:01 -0700, Nurse Nancy
wrote:

I have built a sharepoint site for them via APTIX hosting. Right now the
Access DB is in one piece and resides in a document library in sharepoint.
Only 2 people are using it and they area able to check it out and enter their
data and run queries, reports by taking turns.

I thought Sharepoint could be used to share the DB,, and allow multiple
people to use, update the DB at the same time via active directory but it
doesn't look like that is allowable.

Soon the other 9 people will need acess. I think sharepoint is the best
option for them since they are already paying for it.

When i export the files to lists, can the queries and reports remain in the
access db? Would i give each person a copy of the DB to run locally and link
to the tables in Sharepoint?


I don't have A2007 available at the moment, but my understanding is that you
can use File... Get External Data... Link to link *to a Sharpoint list* as a
table. Storing the database file in a document library is a different
operation; what we're proposing is that each user would have their own
separate copy of an Access database (the "frontend") with links to the
Sharepoint list on a central server. The list would contain the data, and
users could read or update it from their own frontend.
--

John W. Vinson [MVP]
  #22  
Old July 10th, 2009, 12:08 AM posted to microsoft.public.access
David W. Fenton
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,373
Default SQL Server or Sharepoint?

=?Utf-8?B?TnVyc2UgTmFuY3k=?=
wrote in :

I think sharepoint is the best
option for them since they are already paying for it.


But if it can't do what you want and requires re-engineering your
Access app, what good is it to save the money?

--
David W. Fenton http://www.dfenton.com/
usenet at dfenton dot com http://www.dfenton.com/DFA/
  #23  
Old July 10th, 2009, 11:34 AM posted to microsoft.public.access
Nurse Nancy
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 67
Default SQL Server or Sharepoint?

Thanks John,
I will test this out next week and let you know..
Is splitting the database a viable option, or is that what was done before
sharepoint was built?
Nancy


"John W. Vinson" wrote:

On Wed, 8 Jul 2009 19:40:01 -0700, Nurse Nancy
wrote:

I have built a sharepoint site for them via APTIX hosting. Right now the
Access DB is in one piece and resides in a document library in sharepoint.
Only 2 people are using it and they area able to check it out and enter their
data and run queries, reports by taking turns.

I thought Sharepoint could be used to share the DB,, and allow multiple
people to use, update the DB at the same time via active directory but it
doesn't look like that is allowable.

Soon the other 9 people will need acess. I think sharepoint is the best
option for them since they are already paying for it.

When i export the files to lists, can the queries and reports remain in the
access db? Would i give each person a copy of the DB to run locally and link
to the tables in Sharepoint?


I don't have A2007 available at the moment, but my understanding is that you
can use File... Get External Data... Link to link *to a Sharpoint list* as a
table. Storing the database file in a document library is a different
operation; what we're proposing is that each user would have their own
separate copy of an Access database (the "frontend") with links to the
Sharepoint list on a central server. The list would contain the data, and
users could read or update it from their own frontend.
--

John W. Vinson [MVP]

  #24  
Old July 10th, 2009, 03:33 PM posted to microsoft.public.access
John W. Vinson
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 18,261
Default SQL Server or Sharepoint?

On Fri, 10 Jul 2009 03:34:06 -0700, Nurse Nancy
wrote:

Thanks John,
I will test this out next week and let you know..
Is splitting the database a viable option, or is that what was done before
sharepoint was built?
Nancy


Splitting the database IS NOT a viable option for wide-area networks.

First choice: use Citrix or Windows Terminal Server to give users a remote
terminal to log on to a central server containing a split database. Each user
would have a private folder with their own copy of the frontend.

Second choice: use SQL/Server as the backend. If you have a corporate SQL
instance talk to your DBA.

Third choice: Sharepoint. New, limited (no referential integrity), and I have
no direct experience with it.
--

John W. Vinson [MVP]
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:34 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 OfficeFrustration.
The comments are property of their posters.