A Microsoft Office (Excel, Word) forum. OfficeFrustration

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » OfficeFrustration forum » Microsoft Outlook » Calendar
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read  

iCalendar request performs differently in outlook 2002 than outlook 2003



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old May 30th, 2004, 02:31 PM
AguilaEagle
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default iCalendar request performs differently in outlook 2002 than outlook 2003

I use a program that uses SMTP services running on
windows 2000 to send meeting request to users as a
iCalendar request (ics attachment). Anyone that is using
Outlook XP who replys to the request, the orginizer will
get the response. If the same recipient uses Outlook
2003, and replys the appointment is added to their
calendar, but the orginizer never gets the response.
Also in Outlook 2003 the "Propose New Time" button is
grayed out. What is causing the differnet behavior?
  #2  
Old June 1st, 2004, 11:32 PM
Sue Mosher [MVP-Outlook]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default iCalendar request performs differently in outlook 2002 than outlook 2003

Can you post an example of such an iCal item? I've been tracking several
little oddities, but I'm not sure I've seen the one you describe.

--
Sue Mosher, Outlook MVP
Author of
Microsoft Outlook Programming - Jumpstart for
Administrators, Power Users, and Developers
http://www.outlookcode.com/jumpstart.aspx


"AguilaEagle" wrote in message
...
I use a program that uses SMTP services running on
windows 2000 to send meeting request to users as a
iCalendar request (ics attachment). Anyone that is using
Outlook XP who replys to the request, the orginizer will
get the response. If the same recipient uses Outlook
2003, and replys the appointment is added to their
calendar, but the orginizer never gets the response.
Also in Outlook 2003 the "Propose New Time" button is
grayed out. What is causing the differnet behavior?



  #3  
Old June 2nd, 2004, 09:20 PM
Aguila_Eagle
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default iCalendar request performs differently in outlook 2002 than outlook 2003

I've attached a .ics form received on Outlook 2003 and the same from on
Outlook xp works as it should.
Thanks in advance for any suggestions
Mike

-----Original Message-----
From: Sue Mosher [MVP-Outlook] ]
Posted At: Tuesday, June 01, 2004 6:33 PM
Posted To: microsoft.public.outlook.calendaring
Conversation: iCalendar request performs differently in outlook 2002
than outlook 2003
Subject: iCalendar request performs differently in outlook 2002 than
outlook 2003


Can you post an example of such an iCal item? I've been tracking several
little oddities, but I'm not sure I've seen the one you describe.

--
Sue Mosher, Outlook MVP
Author of
Microsoft Outlook Programming - Jumpstart for
Administrators, Power Users, and Developers
http://www.outlookcode.com/jumpstart.aspx


"AguilaEagle" wrote in message
...
I use a program that uses SMTP services running on
windows 2000 to send meeting request to users as a
iCalendar request (ics attachment). Anyone that is using
Outlook XP who replys to the request, the orginizer will
get the response. If the same recipient uses Outlook
2003, and replys the appointment is added to their
calendar, but the orginizer never gets the response.
Also in Outlook 2003 the "Propose New Time" button is
grayed out. What is causing the differnet behavior?



 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:59 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 OfficeFrustration.
The comments are property of their posters.