If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Publisher 2002
I am trying to create a booklet for our senior night and cannot figure out how to get the pages to print back to back. Counting the front and back cover I have 7 pages. I would also like to print on the inside of the front and back cover. HELP-this has to be completed by 5/19!
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Publisher 2002
You can't have 7 pages - unless one of those pages are blank.
Alos, if you are talking about making your printer print on the front and back of a piece of paper, your printer has to be capable of printing duplex. Have you talked to a printer about doing the job? If so, does he accept Publisher files? Ask for advice from him - our recommendations don't mean a thing if your printer handles things differently. (Mac has taught me the importance of getting advice from your printer. Thanks, Mac.) -- JoAnn Paules MVP Microsoft [Publisher] "camslp" wrote in message ... I am trying to create a booklet for our senior night and cannot figure out how to get the pages to print back to back. Counting the front and back cover I have 7 pages. I would also like to print on the inside of the front and back cover. HELP-this has to be completed by 5/19! |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Publisher 2002
-----Original Message----- I am trying to create a booklet for our senior night and cannot figure out how to get the pages to print back to back. Counting the front and back cover I have 7 pages. I would also like to print on the inside of the front and back cover. HELP-this has to be completed by 5/19! . go to double page view to set up your book, then in print, go to collate and follow the instructions. You need to be careful to select which pages to print and then reinsert printed pages the opposite way. it might take some experimentation, but it will do it. Personally, i recommend 2000 version as 2002 is horrible to use - nowhere near as user friendly as 2000! Geoff |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Publisher 2002
But 2002 is better with publications that have photos. Much smaller files.
Plus I *really* like Print Preview. I'm just as fond of 2003 as 2002. -- JoAnn Paules MVP Microsoft [Publisher] "Geoff T" wrote in message ... -----Original Message----- I am trying to create a booklet for our senior night and cannot figure out how to get the pages to print back to back. Counting the front and back cover I have 7 pages. I would also like to print on the inside of the front and back cover. HELP-this has to be completed by 5/19! . go to double page view to set up your book, then in print, go to collate and follow the instructions. You need to be careful to select which pages to print and then reinsert printed pages the opposite way. it might take some experimentation, but it will do it. Personally, i recommend 2000 version as 2002 is horrible to use - nowhere near as user friendly as 2000! Geoff |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Publisher 2002
A small child turns to Ed, and exclaims: "Look! Look! A post from Geoff
T !"... Personally, i recommend 2000 version as 2002 is horrible to use - nowhere near as user friendly as 2000! I would recommend 2002, as IMNSHO 2000 was horrible and nowhere near as easy-to-use as 2002 (of course, 2003 is even easier). What don't you like so much about 2002 that makes you rubbish it so? -- Ed Bennett - MVP Microsoft Publisher http://www.mvps.org/the_nerd/ Before reading this message, view the disclaimer: http://mvps.org/the_nerd/disclaim.htm |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Publisher 2002
JLA you would not know one version from the next and no idea about anything,
so go back to bed and stay there. JLA get a job in Iraq torturing the Iraq people. You would get great pleasure out of that. The poor people of Iraq thought they were escaping Saddam and they ended up with far worse, sick disgusting filth scum slime yankee soldiers. -- "If you don't know where you are going, any road will take you there!" |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Publisher 2002
Limitations on word art. 2002 changes word art from
previous versions to images, thus precluding the option of altering any previous word art. It will not change them back if you ask to save as p2000 either When you try to redo the word art, you're presented with a totally different system which i have found almost totally incomprehensible, without any similarities of operation to the old system that i have been able to find as yet. i'm spending a bit of time where possible to try and get into this new system, but i'm really missing the point of it all, i think. Publisher is a great program and i've worked through every version since about 1985, but when i had a problem with 2000 one day shortly before a deadline and didn't have my install CD with me, i went out and bought the 02 upgrade, thinking it would probably be better, just as every previous version ie 1,2,3,95,98 and 2000 had improved on each other, only to find that having opened my 16 page publication that ALL my word art had been converted to images and I couldn't change ANY of it in the new program!!! I ended up working 30 hours straight to redo all that word art and get my newsletter out on time. First thing I did when I got home was reinstall 2000 and then spent a few more hours redoing the publication so next month I wouldn't be trying to do the same thing again. So you can see why i'm not impressed with 2002. Maybe i need a lesson in using the word art in 02, but i haven't yet been able to get it to produce the same results as 2000 word art Geoff T -----Original Message----- A small child turns to Ed, and exclaims: "Look! Look! A post from Geoff T !"... Personally, i recommend 2000 version as 2002 is horrible to use - nowhere near as user friendly as 2000! I would recommend 2002, as IMNSHO 2000 was horrible and nowhere near as easy-to-use as 2002 (of course, 2003 is even easier). What don't you like so much about 2002 that makes you rubbish it so? -- Ed Bennett - MVP Microsoft Publisher http://www.mvps.org/the_nerd/ Before reading this message, view the disclaimer: http://mvps.org/the_nerd/disclaim.htm . |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Publisher 2002
I'm sure 2002 is improved in many ways over 2000 and
likewise 2003 over 02, BUT i use a lot of word art and i have done since Publisher version 1 around 1984/5 and i've grown with word art, but 2002 word art is just so totally different, i cant get it to work in any way similar to how i used to get previous word art going. print preview is OK, but a little superfluous considering the wysiwyg system used in Pub Thank you for your comments and your offer of help with another post earlier. Geoff T PS disregard that silly post by donotknock@r. Sounds like he needs to get a life or a brain or something. absolutely no need for nastiness like that in a forum where you're trying to help people -----Original Message----- But 2002 is better with publications that have photos. Much smaller files. Plus I *really* like Print Preview. I'm just as fond of 2003 as 2002. -- JoAnn Paules MVP Microsoft [Publisher] "Geoff T" wrote in message ... -----Original Message----- I am trying to create a booklet for our senior night and cannot figure out how to get the pages to print back to back. Counting the front and back cover I have 7 pages. I would also like to print on the inside of the front and back cover. HELP-this has to be completed by 5/19! . go to double page view to set up your book, then in print, go to collate and follow the instructions. You need to be careful to select which pages to print and then reinsert printed pages the opposite way. it might take some experimentation, but it will do it. Personally, i recommend 2000 version as 2002 is horrible to use - nowhere near as user friendly as 2000! Geoff . |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Publisher 2002
You said to JLP:
"PS disregard that silly post by donotknock@r. Sounds like he needs to get a life or a brain or something. absolutely no need for nastiness like that in a forum where you're trying to help people" It was nice of you to stand up for her and probably not just for her but also in a way for others also who would like to use peacefully this peer-to-peer help-discussion group. Vanilla "To teach is to touch a life forever." |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Publisher 2002
Hi Geoff T ),
in the newsgroups you posted: || I'm sure 2002 is improved in many ways over 2000 and || likewise 2003 over 02, BUT i use a lot of word art and i || have done since Publisher version 1 around 1984/5 and || i've grown with word art, but 2002 word art is just so || totally different, i cant get it to work in any way || similar to how i used to get previous word art going. || print preview is OK, but a little superfluous considering || the wysiwyg system used in Pub Geoff, you can use the old WordArt in Publisher 2002/03. Go to Insert Object Create New MS WordArt 2.0 -- Brian Kvalheim Microsoft Publisher MVP http://www.mvps.org/publisher This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|