A Microsoft Office (Excel, Word) forum. OfficeFrustration

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » OfficeFrustration forum » Microsoft Outlook » Outlook Express
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read  

Use of bcc for group emails



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old January 29th, 2010, 10:44 PM posted to microsoft.public.windows.inetexplorer.ie6_outlookexpress
Stuart515
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1
Default Use of bcc for group emails

I have just taken over as unpaid secretary of a golf club and do most of my
work using my home PC. I have distribution list of all members emails (approx
300) but do not wish them all to be displayed to all recipients. I am aware
of the use of bcc to hide other addressees; however, I am told that including
too many addressees in the bcc list causes problems with either ISPs or Spam
filters. Is this true? If so can anyone suggest a work around.

Thank you
  #2  
Old January 29th, 2010, 10:53 PM posted to microsoft.public.windows.inetexplorer.ie6_outlookexpress
Bruce Hagen
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 7,956
Default Use of bcc for group emails

How many recipients is set by your ISP. If they allow 100, then that is
the max you can have in one group. Easiest way to find out their limit is
to call. If needed, they may bump it up if inclined to do so.

I know of no issue with spam programs.
--
Bruce Hagen
MS-MVP [Mail]
Imperial Beach, CA


"Stuart515" wrote in message
...
I have just taken over as unpaid secretary of a golf club and do most of
my
work using my home PC. I have distribution list of all members emails
(approx
300) but do not wish them all to be displayed to all recipients. I am
aware
of the use of bcc to hide other addressees; however, I am told that
including
too many addressees in the bcc list causes problems with either ISPs or
Spam
filters. Is this true? If so can anyone suggest a work around.

Thank you


  #3  
Old January 29th, 2010, 11:06 PM posted to microsoft.public.windows.inetexplorer.ie6_outlookexpress
Corday
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 50
Default Use of bcc for group emails

Some ISPs set a maximum number of bccs to prevent spamming. Some set a daily
limit so breaking up your list will take 1-4 days. Check with your ISP and
see if that applies to you having multiple accounts. If so, then you need to
use a few different free mail programs, telling your members to use your main
account for replies if that's what you want. Try having members respond to an
Email allowing you to create a cc list. They might be cooperative leaving
only a few secrecy buffs.
--
I mastered Wordstar graphics!


"Stuart515" wrote:

I have just taken over as unpaid secretary of a golf club and do most of my
work using my home PC. I have distribution list of all members emails (approx
300) but do not wish them all to be displayed to all recipients. I am aware
of the use of bcc to hide other addressees; however, I am told that including
too many addressees in the bcc list causes problems with either ISPs or Spam
filters. Is this true? If so can anyone suggest a work around.

Thank you

  #4  
Old January 30th, 2010, 07:06 PM posted to microsoft.public.windows.inetexplorer.ie6_outlookexpress
D. Kirkpatrick
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 16
Default Use of bcc for group emails

In article ,
Stuart515 wrote:

I have just taken over as unpaid secretary of a golf club and do most of my
work using my home PC. I have distribution list of all members emails (approx
300) but do not wish them all to be displayed to all recipients. I am aware
of the use of bcc to hide other addressees; however, I am told that including
too many addressees in the bcc list causes problems with either ISPs or Spam
filters. Is this true? If so can anyone suggest a work around.

Thank you




300 recipients in BCC is a dead-on flag to most spam filters.

I'd suggest setting up a Yahoo Group or Google Group that is a one-way
sending list only. That way you can send as necessary, and you can
also set yourself as well as selected alternates up to send out
notices.

There is also a free/shareware called "Group Mail" you can look into.
Group Mail's free version limits sending to 100 per mailing list, so
for 300 you'd want to set up at least 3 lists. Break it up by
alphabet and you could have 4-5.

I use it to send mail to a press list and have it set for 2 lists at
60 per list allowing me to send 2 e-mails to reach 120 contacts.

For my local community center I went the Google Group route and have
it set to send only and only the administrator or authorized accounts
can post out. that way we have a back-up person if I am not around.
I like the Google Groups option because the distributions show up on
the web site, by e-mail, and are also available as an RSS feed. So if
you have an RSS reader plugged in to a web page it automatically
displays there without any further need on your part. I use that
feature to post special announcements on our center's Facebook page.

You also want to check with your internet service provider as most now
have a limit on hte number of e-mails one can send per hour and per
day. This doesn't effect most people so it is invisible to most.

If you find that you need more per hour or day and can demonstrate to
the ISP you have a legitimate need they can expend the parameters on
your account to allow it, assuming they are amenable to that.
  #5  
Old March 10th, 2010, 07:58 PM posted to microsoft.public.windows.inetexplorer.ie6_outlookexpress
elisabeth singendonk
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 214
Default Use of bcc for group emails


"Stuart515" schreef in bericht
...
I have just taken over as unpaid secretary of a golf club and do most of my
work using my home PC. I have distribution list of all members emails
(approx
300) but do not wish them all to be displayed to all recipients. I am
aware
of the use of bcc to hide other addressees; however, I am told that
including
too many addressees in the bcc list causes problems with either ISPs or
Spam
filters. Is this true? If so can anyone suggest a work around.

Thank you



  #6  
Old March 10th, 2010, 07:59 PM posted to microsoft.public.windows.inetexplorer.ie6_outlookexpress
elisabeth singendonk
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 214
Default Use of bcc for group emails


"Stuart515" schreef in bericht
...
I have just taken over as unpaid secretary of a golf club and do most of my
work using my home PC. I have distribution list of all members emails
(approx
300) but do not wish them all to be displayed to all recipients. I am
aware
of the use of bcc to hide other addressees; however, I am told that
including
too many addressees in the bcc list causes problems with either ISPs or
Spam
filters. Is this true? If so can anyone suggest a work around.

Thank you



  #7  
Old March 10th, 2010, 07:59 PM posted to microsoft.public.windows.inetexplorer.ie6_outlookexpress
elisabeth singendonk
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 214
Default Use of bcc for group emails


"Stuart515" schreef in bericht
...
I have just taken over as unpaid secretary of a golf club and do most of my
work using my home PC. I have distribution list of all members emails
(approx
300) but do not wish them all to be displayed to all recipients. I am
aware
of the use of bcc to hide other addressees; however, I am told that
including
too many addressees in the bcc list causes problems with either ISPs or
Spam
filters. Is this true? If so can anyone suggest a work around.

Thank you



  #8  
Old March 10th, 2010, 07:59 PM posted to microsoft.public.windows.inetexplorer.ie6_outlookexpress
elisabeth singendonk
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 214
Default Use of bcc for group emails


"Stuart515" schreef in bericht
...
I have just taken over as unpaid secretary of a golf club and do most of my
work using my home PC. I have distribution list of all members emails
(approx
300) but do not wish them all to be displayed to all recipients. I am
aware
of the use of bcc to hide other addressees; however, I am told that
including
too many addressees in the bcc list causes problems with either ISPs or
Spam
filters. Is this true? If so can anyone suggest a work around.

Thank you



  #9  
Old March 10th, 2010, 08:00 PM posted to microsoft.public.windows.inetexplorer.ie6_outlookexpress
elisabeth singendonk
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 214
Default Use of bcc for group emails


"Stuart515" schreef in bericht
...
I have just taken over as unpaid secretary of a golf club and do most of my
work using my home PC. I have distribution list of all members emails
(approx
300) but do not wish them all to be displayed to all recipients. I am
aware
of the use of bcc to hide other addressees; however, I am told that
including
too many addressees in the bcc list causes problems with either ISPs or
Spam
filters. Is this true? If so can anyone suggest a work around.

Thank you



  #10  
Old March 10th, 2010, 08:01 PM posted to microsoft.public.windows.inetexplorer.ie6_outlookexpress
elisabeth singendonk
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 214
Default Use of bcc for group emails


"Stuart515" schreef in bericht
...
I have just taken over as unpaid secretary of a golf club and do most of my
work using my home PC. I have distribution list of all members emails
(approx
300) but do not wish them all to be displayed to all recipients. I am
aware
of the use of bcc to hide other addressees; however, I am told that
including
too many addressees in the bcc list causes problems with either ISPs or
Spam
filters. Is this true? If so can anyone suggest a work around.

Thank you



 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:58 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 OfficeFrustration.
The comments are property of their posters.