|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#11
July 23rd, 2009, 06:18 PM
posted to microsoft.public.access.forms
|
|||
|
|||
Pop Up Form To Show Next Number
Depending on how many, it might be (?considerably?) faster to just
"manually" add those sequence numbers directly in that table. After all, it IS a one-time need, right? Regards Jeff Boyce Microsoft Office/Access MVP "hobbit2612 via AccessMonster.com" u27332@uwe wrote in message news:99830cc049669@uwe... Bruce, You have fair comment, it isn't usual to assign a new record to a lower value. But it's something that I really need to try and do. Many thanks and regards Chris BruceM wrote: My wondering was because if the numbers are arbitrary references the actual values don't matter, and if they are sequential it is not usual to assign a new record a value lower than an older record. Hi Bruce thanks for getting back to me. [quoted text clipped - 19 lines] Chris -- Message posted via http://www.accessmonster.com 
|
|
#12
July 23rd, 2009, 06:37 PM
posted to microsoft.public.access.forms
|
|||
|
|||
|
Pop Up Form To Show Next Number
Jeff,
There are a few records, but you make a valid point that I could make the changes manually. Many thanks for your time and trouble Regards Chris Jeff Boyce wrote: Depending on how many, it might be (?considerably?) faster to just "manually" add those sequence numbers directly in that table. After all, it IS a one-time need, right? Regards Jeff Boyce Microsoft Office/Access MVP Bruce, [quoted text clipped - 17 lines] Chris -- Message posted via http://www.accessmonster.com
|
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Linear Mode
