If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#41
|
|||
|
|||
What to Ask and How to Answer Questions
Debbie,
I see you are back. You apparently also have trouble telling time. Mike Granny 3.1 wrote: Unfortunatly the law didn't arrest my ex daughter in law as my son had hoped they only warned her that a Sarah Balfour whom they have numerous complaints against had her "sights" set on her and told her to have her ISP change her IP address to prevent further harrassment. Oh, well, can't say he didn't try to kill two birds with one stone. As for the Police Dept FBI says it's not their juristriction and contacted them with all the info they have on Sarah...which seems to be considerable they said and I'm quoting my granddaughter so she might not have gotten it quite right she is only 8 "they told mommy a cyber stalker was after her" Better luck next time. Maybe if she changed her name to complain they would take her more seriously but it seems they have a fat file of complaints against her and don't take any of her complaints seriously as they have looked into and confirmed the complaints against her. Almost midnight here, just thought you'd like to know the results of her attempt at trying to be "sweet" the FBI saw right thru that. "Box134" wrote: You're too late. Porkolotta has contacted the Amarillo Police department and the FBI because someone sent her two e-mails five minutes apart. Coo-Coo! "I've been sent two emails from people I don't know (one I think was a 'tester' for the other). Okay, that's not strictly true, the second I'm 99% certain who the sender is and, because of the identical IP, I'm 95% certain they're the same person. The first sender had the name of her location in her address, and the IP resolves to the same city (Amarillo, as it goes, but if I have any Tony Christie/Peter Kay impressions there will be consequences...). It was someone I exposed as a liar, fraud and troll in another group and she didn't like that much. The thing is, I never could convince her that US law didn't apply in the UK (she was claiming, for example, that she wrote a piece of software, which was an obvious lie as she couldn't even get the name right!) The fact that they were sent within 5 minutes of each other, the identical IPs and the style makes me think they're the same person, but I'd like to be certain that two individuals couldn't be assigned the same IP. Cheers Sarah" "Granny 3.1" wrote in message news How about we just hit them with the new law made just for this problem. No illegal posts, no insults, no untruths and no liable posts. I pray MS will give us their IP and email and I'll sick my lawyer (brother in law) on her happily and sleep well at night knowing I did it the legal way. Granny 3.1 |
#42
|
|||
|
|||
What to Ask and How to Answer Questions
Debbie,
Do you really want your history posted so Google can collect it and save it for posterity? To be blunt, you should not have picked on Sarah in the method you did. I pick on her for not being nice to posters, but I don't bring in her personal life. You've gone farther and not only introduced this aspect, but lied about it and then followed it up with personal e-mail that can land you a very long-term jail sentence. I suggest you crawl back into your hole and give up this battle you are not going to win. You've been nailed, DJ. Give it a rest before you need a crane to lift yourself out of the hole you have dug. Mike Granny 3.1 wrote: Yippeee!!! couldn't have heard better news if I had prayed for it. Way to go parents...30 something and living at home. That's almost too pathetic to be funny...almost. P.S. poor cat....run kitty, run!!! "Box134" wrote: This just in..... Sarah, aka Margolotta, has been kicked out of the house by her father. Someone in her house messed with her Mac and she let them have it between the eyes. So she said good bye to her Mac buddies and said she'd be off the airwaves for a while. I'll believe it when I see it, or don't see it, in this case. Probably the smartest thing her parents have done in a long time. Oh yes, she was admiring her cat's testicles a few days back.... need I say more? Margolotta wrote: On Thu, 5 Jan 2006 23:01:52 +0000, Erika wrote You're one of those happy-clappy born again idiots aren't you? I can't do with people like you. In a minute you'll be telling me that all I need to do is let Jesus into my life and all my problems will miraculously vanish. Xian ******** - I'm heartily sick of it. It's time you lot joined the real world. |
#43
|
|||
|
|||
What to Ask and How to Answer Questions
I couldn't agree more. Deborah Jean pointed me to these threads and I
don't think this is the image she really wants to portray to her peers. It's a shame, actually, to see someone who started out as a very professional, knowledgeable and helpful individual start spinning out of control. Deborah Jean: Always remember hatred has a way of ultimately turning you into those you hate and if you continue, eventually there will be those who start digging up old threads and seeking you out for attack. Stop a moment and consider why Sarah flamed you in the first place. I've followed the threads here and in other newsgroups from the beginning and here's my unbiased viewpoint, which if you recall, you asked for in another thread: Sarah may chastise posters but seldom does she pull out the heavy duty flame thrower and go all out. I've been around the newsgroups and Sarah long enough to know that she doesn't randomly select someone for a 'full force flaming', those are reserved for those who she feels deserves a good flaming and typically this is someone who has flamed others for no good reason. Prior to Sarah flaming you, you gave few folks in this newsgroup and in other newsgroups a good flaming. If you flame then be prepared to be flamed back. Note I'm one who wishes everyone would get along so by no means do I think flaming or chastising is acceptable, but I am capable of understanding why flaming occurs and I also feel this situation needs some perspective. I'm also hoping to save you from yourself. And as a word of advice, you aren't posting in an exclusive forum. The web interface to access the newsgroups on the Microsoft is only one means of accessing Usenet. Folks from all over the world access the newsgroups using a variety of newsreaders and web forums. So your newsgroup posts are sent all over the world to thousands of news servers and are viewed by a *lot* of individuals. Not just those who are active in this forum, there are many lurkers watching and reading. What I'm getting at is you have revealed enough personal information about yourself in various posts which makes it easy to find personal and private information on the Internet. I did a little searching just to see how vulnerable you may be to attack and I found enough private information that I'm certain you would not want to see it publicized. I know you are doing what you feel is the 'right thing' but in the end it will prove fruitless and ultimately cause you more damage. I'd like to see the helpful and professional Debora Jean return and see Granny 3.1 leave for good. ~Beth Melton "Mike Koewler" wrote in message ... To be blunt, you should not have picked on Sarah in the method you did. I pick on her for not being nice to posters, but I don't bring in her personal life. You've gone farther and not only introduced this aspect, but lied about it and then followed it up with personal e-mail that can land you a very long-term jail sentence. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|