If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Individual vs.whole dB locks on forms/reports during modification
MS underestimates how much on-the-fly use there is out here of access DBs.
In my engineering co we have teams of 5-10 users modifying data directly in the .mdb files all the time. Linked front ends are just too slow and time is money in all businesses. And no, we don't restrict users to forms although we do use forms and reports to meet a particular need and those needs change on an hourly basis. Locks should be smart enough to determine that if noone is using a paticular form or report, modification is ok. How about a lock on the form, not on the whole database! Same as it is with tables, right? Here's another data integrity SNAFU, say a user opens a form for modify and they are notified that they cannot save changes because they do not have exclusive access, and they select to go ahead and edit the form....everyone is still locked out, until that user closes the form view and they will never be able to save their changes until everyone is logged out. A access stalemate! MS data integrity means 'prevent everyone from doing anything', or at least make it hard enough that they lose the urge to try. ---------------- This post is a suggestion for Microsoft, and Microsoft responds to the suggestions with the most votes. To vote for this suggestion, click the "I Agree" button in the message pane. If you do not see the button, follow this link to open the suggestion in the Microsoft Web-based Newsreader and then click "I Agree" in the message pane. http://www.microsoft.com/office/comm...c.access.forms |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Is there a question here or do you just want to rant?
-- --Roger Carlson Access Database Samples: www.rogersaccesslibrary.com Want answers to your Access questions in your Email? Free subscription: http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/scripts/...UBED1=ACCESS-L "mikebris@bmcd" wrote in message ... MS underestimates how much on-the-fly use there is out here of access DBs. In my engineering co we have teams of 5-10 users modifying data directly in the .mdb files all the time. Linked front ends are just too slow and time is money in all businesses. And no, we don't restrict users to forms although we do use forms and reports to meet a particular need and those needs change on an hourly basis. Locks should be smart enough to determine that if noone is using a paticular form or report, modification is ok. How about a lock on the form, not on the whole database! Same as it is with tables, right? Here's another data integrity SNAFU, say a user opens a form for modify and they are notified that they cannot save changes because they do not have exclusive access, and they select to go ahead and edit the form....everyone is still locked out, until that user closes the form view and they will never be able to save their changes until everyone is logged out. A access stalemate! MS data integrity means 'prevent everyone from doing anything', or at least make it hard enough that they lose the urge to try. ---------------- This post is a suggestion for Microsoft, and Microsoft responds to the suggestions with the most votes. To vote for this suggestion, click the "I Agree" button in the message pane. If you do not see the button, follow this link to open the suggestion in the Microsoft Web-based Newsreader and then click "I Agree" in the message pane. http://www.microsoft.com/office/comm...c.access.forms |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
He just want to rant. What he wants is to use the tool incorrectly, but it
be smart enough to let him do things that he should not. Sure, time = money in business, but how much time is he losing by not properly designing and building a database that will work for him? Further more, he obviously does not understand what a database really is. My recommendation would be that he abandon Access and use Excel. It is designed to allow inconsistent, unusable, and unedited data. "Roger Carlson" wrote: Is there a question here or do you just want to rant? -- --Roger Carlson Access Database Samples: www.rogersaccesslibrary.com Want answers to your Access questions in your Email? Free subscription: http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/scripts/...UBED1=ACCESS-L "mikebris@bmcd" wrote in message ... MS underestimates how much on-the-fly use there is out here of access DBs. In my engineering co we have teams of 5-10 users modifying data directly in the .mdb files all the time. Linked front ends are just too slow and time is money in all businesses. And no, we don't restrict users to forms although we do use forms and reports to meet a particular need and those needs change on an hourly basis. Locks should be smart enough to determine that if noone is using a paticular form or report, modification is ok. How about a lock on the form, not on the whole database! Same as it is with tables, right? Here's another data integrity SNAFU, say a user opens a form for modify and they are notified that they cannot save changes because they do not have exclusive access, and they select to go ahead and edit the form....everyone is still locked out, until that user closes the form view and they will never be able to save their changes until everyone is logged out. A access stalemate! MS data integrity means 'prevent everyone from doing anything', or at least make it hard enough that they lose the urge to try. ---------------- This post is a suggestion for Microsoft, and Microsoft responds to the suggestions with the most votes. To vote for this suggestion, click the "I Agree" button in the message pane. If you do not see the button, follow this link to open the suggestion in the Microsoft Web-based Newsreader and then click "I Agree" in the message pane. http://www.microsoft.com/office/comm...c.access.forms |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Mike,
You obviously don't know much about databases in general and Access in particular. If you did, you would be able to configure your database to overcome the issues you are complaining about. I suggest you do one of two things. Either find someone who is competent to structure your database so you can use it or "loose your urge to try" and use Excel instead. "mikebris@bmcd" wrote: MS underestimates how much on-the-fly use there is out here of access DBs. In my engineering co we have teams of 5-10 users modifying data directly in the .mdb files all the time. Linked front ends are just too slow and time is money in all businesses. And no, we don't restrict users to forms although we do use forms and reports to meet a particular need and those needs change on an hourly basis. Locks should be smart enough to determine that if noone is using a paticular form or report, modification is ok. How about a lock on the form, not on the whole database! Same as it is with tables, right? Here's another data integrity SNAFU, say a user opens a form for modify and they are notified that they cannot save changes because they do not have exclusive access, and they select to go ahead and edit the form....everyone is still locked out, until that user closes the form view and they will never be able to save their changes until everyone is logged out. A access stalemate! MS data integrity means 'prevent everyone from doing anything', or at least make it hard enough that they lose the urge to try. ---------------- This post is a suggestion for Microsoft, and Microsoft responds to the suggestions with the most votes. To vote for this suggestion, click the "I Agree" button in the message pane. If you do not see the button, follow this link to open the suggestion in the Microsoft Web-based Newsreader and then click "I Agree" in the message pane. http://www.microsoft.com/office/comm...c.access.forms |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
I didn't think new groupies would be reading this....
But to answer your question, NO, there is no question, but there are implicit sugestions which is what the site is trying to collect..hence the big buttons where you can either agree or disagree to vote for a ....suggestion. So to spell them out for those who prefer not to analzye what they read, my suggestions a Fix access so that users can once again modify forms while others are logged in. Fix acesss so that users can once again modify reports while others are logged in. Fix access so that a user is not allowed to put the whole database in a locked state while others are logged in. Employ per form and per report level locks exactly like the table locks so that other users can sill acess data even though someone is creating a report or form for their own use. "Roger Carlson" wrote: Is there a question here or do you just want to rant? -- --Roger Carlson Access Database Samples: www.rogersaccesslibrary.com Want answers to your Access questions in your Email? Free subscription: http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/scripts/...UBED1=ACCESS-L "mikebris@bmcd" wrote in message ... MS underestimates how much on-the-fly use there is out here of access DBs. In my engineering co we have teams of 5-10 users modifying data directly in the .mdb files all the time. Linked front ends are just too slow and time is money in all businesses. And no, we don't restrict users to forms although we do use forms and reports to meet a particular need and those needs change on an hourly basis. Locks should be smart enough to determine that if noone is using a paticular form or report, modification is ok. How about a lock on the form, not on the whole database! Same as it is with tables, right? Here's another data integrity SNAFU, say a user opens a form for modify and they are notified that they cannot save changes because they do not have exclusive access, and they select to go ahead and edit the form....everyone is still locked out, until that user closes the form view and they will never be able to save their changes until everyone is logged out. A access stalemate! MS data integrity means 'prevent everyone from doing anything', or at least make it hard enough that they lose the urge to try. ---------------- This post is a suggestion for Microsoft, and Microsoft responds to the suggestions with the most votes. To vote for this suggestion, click the "I Agree" button in the message pane. If you do not see the button, follow this link to open the suggestion in the Microsoft Web-based Newsreader and then click "I Agree" in the message pane. http://www.microsoft.com/office/comm...c.access.forms |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Newbie? You must be kidding.
If you know what you are doing, everything you want "fixed" you could do yourself with the exception of locking forms and reports which really makes no sense at all. It is reasonable that multiple users can use the same form. It is the data you want to protect. Reports are output to present data, not interactive objects at all. Now, if you would like to improve your life, why not ask some questions here about how to implement locking the way you need it, and how to configure your application to improve performance. I'm sure you will find plenty of people here more than willing to help. "mikebris@bmcd" wrote: I didn't think new groupies would be reading this.... But to answer your question, NO, there is no question, but there are implicit sugestions which is what the site is trying to collect..hence the big buttons where you can either agree or disagree to vote for a ...suggestion. So to spell them out for those who prefer not to analzye what they read, my suggestions a Fix access so that users can once again modify forms while others are logged in. Fix acesss so that users can once again modify reports while others are logged in. Fix access so that a user is not allowed to put the whole database in a locked state while others are logged in. Employ per form and per report level locks exactly like the table locks so that other users can sill acess data even though someone is creating a report or form for their own use. "Roger Carlson" wrote: Is there a question here or do you just want to rant? -- --Roger Carlson Access Database Samples: www.rogersaccesslibrary.com Want answers to your Access questions in your Email? Free subscription: http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/scripts/...UBED1=ACCESS-L "mikebris@bmcd" wrote in message ... MS underestimates how much on-the-fly use there is out here of access DBs. In my engineering co we have teams of 5-10 users modifying data directly in the .mdb files all the time. Linked front ends are just too slow and time is money in all businesses. And no, we don't restrict users to forms although we do use forms and reports to meet a particular need and those needs change on an hourly basis. Locks should be smart enough to determine that if noone is using a paticular form or report, modification is ok. How about a lock on the form, not on the whole database! Same as it is with tables, right? Here's another data integrity SNAFU, say a user opens a form for modify and they are notified that they cannot save changes because they do not have exclusive access, and they select to go ahead and edit the form....everyone is still locked out, until that user closes the form view and they will never be able to save their changes until everyone is logged out. A access stalemate! MS data integrity means 'prevent everyone from doing anything', or at least make it hard enough that they lose the urge to try. ---------------- This post is a suggestion for Microsoft, and Microsoft responds to the suggestions with the most votes. To vote for this suggestion, click the "I Agree" button in the message pane. If you do not see the button, follow this link to open the suggestion in the Microsoft Web-based Newsreader and then click "I Agree" in the message pane. http://www.microsoft.com/office/comm...c.access.forms |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Quippy but useless, and how grandios does someone have to be to suppose they
know what someone else does or does not know or how they need to use a database to perform their work. Do you work for Microsoft? Do I know VB - enough to get in trouble Do I know VBA - enough to do what I need to. Do you have any idea of how I use Access, what kind of data I use it to process, or how access speeds up my work? NO. Do you know how we use access to make 65000 wire terminations land in the right spot at a power plant in Montana with use multiple tables and a couple of queries and forms? Then shut up. Mike Controls Engineer "Klatuu" wrote: Mike, You obviously don't know much about databases in general and Access in particular. If you did, you would be able to configure your database to overcome the issues you are complaining about. I suggest you do one of two things. Either find someone who is competent to structure your database so you can use it or "loose your urge to try" and use Excel instead. "mikebris@bmcd" wrote: MS underestimates how much on-the-fly use there is out here of access DBs. In my engineering co we have teams of 5-10 users modifying data directly in the .mdb files all the time. Linked front ends are just too slow and time is money in all businesses. And no, we don't restrict users to forms although we do use forms and reports to meet a particular need and those needs change on an hourly basis. Locks should be smart enough to determine that if noone is using a paticular form or report, modification is ok. How about a lock on the form, not on the whole database! Same as it is with tables, right? Here's another data integrity SNAFU, say a user opens a form for modify and they are notified that they cannot save changes because they do not have exclusive access, and they select to go ahead and edit the form....everyone is still locked out, until that user closes the form view and they will never be able to save their changes until everyone is logged out. A access stalemate! MS data integrity means 'prevent everyone from doing anything', or at least make it hard enough that they lose the urge to try. ---------------- This post is a suggestion for Microsoft, and Microsoft responds to the suggestions with the most votes. To vote for this suggestion, click the "I Agree" button in the message pane. If you do not see the button, follow this link to open the suggestion in the Microsoft Web-based Newsreader and then click "I Agree" in the message pane. http://www.microsoft.com/office/comm...c.access.forms |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
New groupies...that's rich.
Suggestion: Fix access so that users can once again modify forms while others are logged in. Answer: MS deliberately put this in Access 2000 because of the multitude of problems with earlier versions that allowed people to edit database objects like forms and reports while other users are in the database. It was a major cause of database corruption. Suggestion: Fix acesss so that users can once again modify reports while others are logged in. Answer: ditto above. Although you don't want to use Front-Ends, this is the best practice. You don't get users walking all over each other's design changes. Way back when Access allowed it, this was a constant headache for the database developer. Suggestion: Fix access so that a user is not allowed to put the whole database in a locked state while others are logged in. Answer: Not sure what you mean here. If you're talking about database objects (forms, reports, etc.), then it's the same answer as above. If you are talking about one user opening the database and then it's Read-Only by everyone else, this is a Network Rights issue. If you're talking about record-locking, you have to have something like this in any multi-user database product. Suggestion: Employ per form and per report level locks exactly like the table locks so that other users can still access data even though someone is creating a report or form for their own use Answered above. You're repeating yourself. Frankly, you're deliberately using the product incorrectly then complaining about it. You don't use a wrench to pound nails and then wonder why it doesn't work very well, do you? -- --Roger Carlson Access Database Samples: www.rogersaccesslibrary.com Want answers to your Access questions in your Email? Free subscription: http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/scripts/...UBED1=ACCESS-L "mikebris@bmcd" wrote in message ... I didn't think new groupies would be reading this.... But to answer your question, NO, there is no question, but there are implicit sugestions which is what the site is trying to collect..hence the big buttons where you can either agree or disagree to vote for a ...suggestion. So to spell them out for those who prefer not to analzye what they read, my suggestions a Fix access so that users can once again modify forms while others are logged in. Fix acesss so that users can once again modify reports while others are logged in. Fix access so that a user is not allowed to put the whole database in a locked state while others are logged in. Employ per form and per report level locks exactly like the table locks so that other users can sill acess data even though someone is creating a report or form for their own use. "Roger Carlson" wrote: Is there a question here or do you just want to rant? -- --Roger Carlson Access Database Samples: www.rogersaccesslibrary.com Want answers to your Access questions in your Email? Free subscription: http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/scripts/...UBED1=ACCESS-L "mikebris@bmcd" wrote in message ... MS underestimates how much on-the-fly use there is out here of access DBs. In my engineering co we have teams of 5-10 users modifying data directly in the .mdb files all the time. Linked front ends are just too slow and time is money in all businesses. And no, we don't restrict users to forms although we do use forms and reports to meet a particular need and those needs change on an hourly basis. Locks should be smart enough to determine that if noone is using a paticular form or report, modification is ok. How about a lock on the form, not on the whole database! Same as it is with tables, right? Here's another data integrity SNAFU, say a user opens a form for modify and they are notified that they cannot save changes because they do not have exclusive access, and they select to go ahead and edit the form....everyone is still locked out, until that user closes the form view and they will never be able to save their changes until everyone is logged out. A access stalemate! MS data integrity means 'prevent everyone from doing anything', or at least make it hard enough that they lose the urge to try. ---------------- This post is a suggestion for Microsoft, and Microsoft responds to the suggestions with the most votes. To vote for this suggestion, click the "I Agree" button in the message pane. If you do not see the button, follow this link to open the suggestion in the Microsoft Web-based Newsreader and then click "I Agree" in the message pane. http://www.microsoft.com/office/comm...c.access.forms |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
All I could possibly know about you is what is in your posts. And, sadly, I
am very under impressed. You really do not know much about Access or how to configure it. No sin there, that what this site is for - to learn. It really is not a bitch blog. So, please allow me to give you one pointer with your locking problem that may help: From your database menu, select Tools- Options - Advanced tab Then set Default Open Mode to Shared Set Default Record Locking to No Locks This will allow mutiple users to edit data as much as they like. It will only lock a record while it is being updated. I hope this will help your database and improve your demeanor. "mikebris@bmcd" wrote: Quippy but useless, and how grandios does someone have to be to suppose they know what someone else does or does not know or how they need to use a database to perform their work. Do you work for Microsoft? Do I know VB - enough to get in trouble Do I know VBA - enough to do what I need to. Do you have any idea of how I use Access, what kind of data I use it to process, or how access speeds up my work? NO. Do you know how we use access to make 65000 wire terminations land in the right spot at a power plant in Montana with use multiple tables and a couple of queries and forms? Then shut up. Mike Controls Engineer "Klatuu" wrote: Mike, You obviously don't know much about databases in general and Access in particular. If you did, you would be able to configure your database to overcome the issues you are complaining about. I suggest you do one of two things. Either find someone who is competent to structure your database so you can use it or "loose your urge to try" and use Excel instead. "mikebris@bmcd" wrote: MS underestimates how much on-the-fly use there is out here of access DBs. In my engineering co we have teams of 5-10 users modifying data directly in the .mdb files all the time. Linked front ends are just too slow and time is money in all businesses. And no, we don't restrict users to forms although we do use forms and reports to meet a particular need and those needs change on an hourly basis. Locks should be smart enough to determine that if noone is using a paticular form or report, modification is ok. How about a lock on the form, not on the whole database! Same as it is with tables, right? Here's another data integrity SNAFU, say a user opens a form for modify and they are notified that they cannot save changes because they do not have exclusive access, and they select to go ahead and edit the form....everyone is still locked out, until that user closes the form view and they will never be able to save their changes until everyone is logged out. A access stalemate! MS data integrity means 'prevent everyone from doing anything', or at least make it hard enough that they lose the urge to try. ---------------- This post is a suggestion for Microsoft, and Microsoft responds to the suggestions with the most votes. To vote for this suggestion, click the "I Agree" button in the message pane. If you do not see the button, follow this link to open the suggestion in the Microsoft Web-based Newsreader and then click "I Agree" in the message pane. http://www.microsoft.com/office/comm...c.access.forms |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
It's a very good thing that you're so good you don't need any help, because
I fear with that attitude, you won't get any here. -- --Roger Carlson Access Database Samples: www.rogersaccesslibrary.com Want answers to your Access questions in your Email? Free subscription: http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/scripts/...UBED1=ACCESS-L "mikebris@bmcd" wrote in message ... Quippy but useless, and how grandios does someone have to be to suppose they know what someone else does or does not know or how they need to use a database to perform their work. Do you work for Microsoft? Do I know VB - enough to get in trouble Do I know VBA - enough to do what I need to. Do you have any idea of how I use Access, what kind of data I use it to process, or how access speeds up my work? NO. Do you know how we use access to make 65000 wire terminations land in the right spot at a power plant in Montana with use multiple tables and a couple of queries and forms? Then shut up. Mike Controls Engineer "Klatuu" wrote: Mike, You obviously don't know much about databases in general and Access in particular. If you did, you would be able to configure your database to overcome the issues you are complaining about. I suggest you do one of two things. Either find someone who is competent to structure your database so you can use it or "loose your urge to try" and use Excel instead. "mikebris@bmcd" wrote: MS underestimates how much on-the-fly use there is out here of access DBs. In my engineering co we have teams of 5-10 users modifying data directly in the .mdb files all the time. Linked front ends are just too slow and time is money in all businesses. And no, we don't restrict users to forms although we do use forms and reports to meet a particular need and those needs change on an hourly basis. Locks should be smart enough to determine that if noone is using a paticular form or report, modification is ok. How about a lock on the form, not on the whole database! Same as it is with tables, right? Here's another data integrity SNAFU, say a user opens a form for modify and they are notified that they cannot save changes because they do not have exclusive access, and they select to go ahead and edit the form....everyone is still locked out, until that user closes the form view and they will never be able to save their changes until everyone is logged out. A access stalemate! MS data integrity means 'prevent everyone from doing anything', or at least make it hard enough that they lose the urge to try. ---------------- This post is a suggestion for Microsoft, and Microsoft responds to the suggestions with the most votes. To vote for this suggestion, click the "I Agree" button in the message pane. If you do not see the button, follow this link to open the suggestion in the Microsoft Web-based Newsreader and then click "I Agree" in the message pane. http://www.microsoft.com/office/comm...c.access.forms |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|