Fonts for books, with more description in the question

am putting together a book of historical documents from my library. I have
visitors to my library and I think that I could do a book on them.

I am going to use 8 1/2 X 11 inch pages of acid free paper but not finished
paper. I have two fonts I need, one for my text explaining the source of the
text. Another for the historical text itself.

For my text I want to have the feeling of being modern, credible, pleasing
to the eye, friendly, easy to read for wide accessibility, and not
off-putting by being too pretty, unfriendly, or officious or heavy.

The quotes need to be easy to read, somehow the feeling of historical
documents, but under no circumstances any romanticization or beautification.

They need to be fonts on my Word that came with my XP Windows computer.

Thanks

Ed Sebesta

Answered elsewhere. The demons of multi-posting!



"newtknight" wrote in message
link.net...
am putting together a book of historical documents from my library. I have
visitors to my library and I think that I could do a book on them.

I am going to use 8 1/2 X 11 inch pages of acid free paper but not
finished
paper. I have two fonts I need, one for my text explaining the source of
the
text. Another for the historical text itself.

For my text I want to have the feeling of being modern, credible,
pleasing
to the eye, friendly, easy to read for wide accessibility, and not
off-putting by being too pretty, unfriendly, or officious or heavy.

The quotes need to be easy to read, somehow the feeling of historical
documents, but under no circumstances any romanticization or
beautification.

They need to be fonts on my Word that came with my XP Windows computer.

Thanks

Ed Sebesta

Answered where? I suppose this makes an officious person like yourself feel
superior.



"Jezebel" wrote in message
...
Answered elsewhere. The demons of multi-posting!



"newtknight" wrote in message
link.net...
am putting together a book of historical documents from my library. I
have
visitors to my library and I think that I could do a book on them.

I am going to use 8 1/2 X 11 inch pages of acid free paper but not
finished
paper. I have two fonts I need, one for my text explaining the source of
the
text. Another for the historical text itself.

For my text I want to have the feeling of being modern, credible,
pleasing
to the eye, friendly, easy to read for wide accessibility, and not
off-putting by being too pretty, unfriendly, or officious or heavy.

The quotes need to be easy to read, somehow the feeling of historical
documents, but under no circumstances any romanticization or
beautification.

They need to be fonts on my Word that came with my XP Windows computer.

Thanks

Ed Sebesta

I am thinking of either Palatino Linotype 12 pt or 13 pt. Garamond 12 or 13
pt, and Bookman Old Style 11 pt. My text is about 10% of the book, and the
documents and image files of historical documents are about 90%.

I think that it meets my needs, is an open easy to read text for academic
and non-academic audiences. It would not be alienating. Old Goudy I think my
romanticize the texts.

"newtknight" wrote in message
link.net...
am putting together a book of historical documents from my library. I have
visitors to my library and I think that I could do a book on them.

I am going to use 8 1/2 X 11 inch pages of acid free paper but not
finished
paper. I have two fonts I need, one for my text explaining the source of
the
text. Another for the historical text itself.

For my text I want to have the feeling of being modern, credible,
pleasing
to the eye, friendly, easy to read for wide accessibility, and not
off-putting by being too pretty, unfriendly, or officious or heavy.

The quotes need to be easy to read, somehow the feeling of historical
documents, but under no circumstances any romanticization or
beautification.

They need to be fonts on my Word that came with my XP Windows computer.

Thanks

Ed Sebesta

I am putting together a book of historical documents from my library. I have
visitors to my library and I think that I could do a book on them.

I am going to use 8 1/2 X 11 inch pages of acid free paper but not finished
paper. I have two fonts I need, one for my text explaining the source of the
text. Another for the historical text itself.

For my text I want to have the feeling of being modern, credible, pleasing
to the eye, friendly, easy to read for wide accessibility, and not
off-putting by being too pretty, unfriendly, or officious or heavy.

The quotes need to be easy to read, somehow the feeling of historical
documents, but under no circumstances any romanticization or beautification.

They need to be fonts on my Word that came with my XP Windows computer.

Thanks

Ed Sebesta

"newtknight" wrote in message
link.net...
am putting together a book of historical documents from my library. I have
visitors to my library and I think that I could do a book on them.

I am going to use 8 1/2 X 11 inch pages of acid free paper but not
finished
paper. I have two fonts I need, one for my text explaining the source of
the
text. Another for the historical text itself.

For my text I want to have the feeling of being modern, credible,
pleasing
to the eye, friendly, easy to read for wide accessibility, and not
off-putting by being too pretty, unfriendly, or officious or heavy.

The quotes need to be easy to read, somehow the feeling of historical
documents, but under no circumstances any romanticization or
beautification.

They need to be fonts on my Word that came with my XP Windows computer.

Thanks

Ed Sebesta

"newtknight" wrote in message
news
Answered where?

I presume in one of the other groups you have posted to. You know what they
are.


I suppose this makes an officious person like yourself
feel
superior.

The message was not so much intended for you as to warn others not to waste
time answering a question which had already been dealt with.

Please remember that nobody is paid to answer questions in the newsgroups.
They all have a day job doing something else. Those who answer do so because
they enjoy it.

It is very unusual for it to be necessary to get half the answer from each
of two different groups. If you feel you *must* post your message to
multiple groups, please include the names of all the groups in the header
for a single message, rather than posting separate messages to each group.
This makes it easier for you and everyone else to keep track of who has
replied to the question. It is a real annoyance to those who answer to spend
an hour on a question only to find someone has already answered it in
another group.

More tips on posting to the newsgroups can be found here.

Tips from MVPs on posting to the Word newsgroups
http://word.mvps.org/FindHelp/Posting.htm


--
Regards
Jonathan West - Word MVP
www.intelligentdocuments.co.uk
Please reply to the newsgroup