If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
ilegal operation
Hi,
I developed one excel file in Office XP. It is linked with 6 files, it contents around 2500 linked cells. If I try to open the file from the excel with version lower then HP, illegal operation message shows and program falls. Also I get run time error when I try to use findlink macro. Is there any limitation for number of linked cells in one file, which is different for different excel versions? Thanks in advance Emilija |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Emilija wrote:
Also I get run time error when I try to use findlink macro. It would help if you indicated: - the version of FindLink - the text of the error message - the choices you made on the dialog If you use the Help button on the dialog it will tell you how to report the problem directly to me. Is there any limitation for number of linked cells in one file, which is different for different excel versions? Not as far as I know Bill Manville MVP - Microsoft Excel, Oxford, England No email replies please - respond to newsgroup |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Error 3246 : Operation not supported | Chris | New Users | 0 | December 2nd, 2004 02:37 PM |
Strange stLinkCriteria behaviour on command button | Anthony Dowd | Using Forms | 3 | August 21st, 2004 03:01 AM |
Default values to load up automatically in a form based on value entered in another form | Anthony Dowd | Using Forms | 8 | August 12th, 2004 08:53 AM |
"Iexplore" illegal operation problem? | Martin | Outlook Express | 1 | July 15th, 2004 08:18 PM |
Cummaltive/Summarised Item total on a different product vlookup, depending on the description on the operation | John Colling | Worksheet Functions | 2 | February 21st, 2004 03:44 PM |