If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Time to move on...
I'm finally at the stage where I need to investigate other options. I have
consultants in the field all over North America and our Access app is critical to our companies function. The problem is that the file size for the .mde is now over 80 meg. It's becoming a major problem for people in the field to download a thick client 2 or 3 times a week. I either need a way to split up the application into smaller pieces or find something that will convert the Acess app to another language such as VB .NET or JAVA where we can have a thin client or where I can break the form in the Access app into smaller files. I would really appreciate any suggestions that anyone might have. Thank you in advance for your advice! |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Time to move on...
Per PeterM:
I'm finally at the stage where I need to investigate other options. I have consultants in the field all over North America and our Access app is critical to our companies function. The problem is that the file size for the .mde is now over 80 meg. It's becoming a major problem for people in the field to download a thick client 2 or 3 times a week. I either need a way to split up the application into smaller pieces or find something that will convert the Acess app to another language such as VB .NET or JAVA where we can have a thin client or where I can break the form in the Access app into smaller files. I would really appreciate any suggestions that anyone might have. Thank you in advance for your advice! Sounds like maybe the front end and back end are all in one .MDB and the people in the field are downloading the whole enchilada. Have I got that part right? If so, and based on your idea of doing something with VB.net, I'd guess that the people in the field have some sort of connection to the company LAN/WAN. If that's true, the quickest/easiest thing to try is separating the front end from the back end (i.e. a .MDB for each...). Then the users only have to download the front end once and they can be ODBC'd to the back end. Depending on how that works out and how many users are going to be hammering on it, the next thing I'd do is migrate the back to SQL Server and just change the ODBC links in the front end to point to the server tables. Once that is up and running, I'd look for performance issues and write stored procedures in the back end to resolve them. -- PeteCresswell |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Time to move on...
PeterM wrote:
I'm finally at the stage where I need to investigate other options. I have consultants in the field all over North America and our Access app is critical to our companies function. The problem is that the file size for the .mde is now over 80 meg. It's becoming a major problem for people in the field to download a thick client 2 or 3 times a week. I either need a way to split up the application into smaller pieces or find something that will convert the Acess app to another language such as VB .NET or JAVA where we can have a thin client or where I can break the form in the Access app into smaller files. I would really appreciate any suggestions that anyone might have. Thank you in advance for your advice! Why do they have to download the MDE 2 or 3 times a week? -- I don't check the Email account attached to this message. Send instead to... RBrandt at Hunter dot com |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Time to move on...
Actually, the 80 meg .mde is just the front end...we have our tables out on a
server provided by a host provider. The app has over 125 forms, 300 queries and about 45 tables. Actually we're a very small company and have only about 10 people in the field accessing this app. They all have ODBC connections setup and that's how they get to the tables. All they need is an ISP connection, usually in a hotel or at home and the ODBC connection directs them to the back end tables. We're restricted to MySQL on the host provider on the back end for now, but ODBC handles it perfectly. I'm an old COBOL developer years ago and have taught myself Access over the past 3 years. So I don't look forward to learning another language and developing another architecture, but it's looking more and more like I need to do that. Do you know of any decent conversion tools or have any other ideas? thanks for your response Pete "(PeteCresswell)" wrote: Per PeterM: I'm finally at the stage where I need to investigate other options. I have consultants in the field all over North America and our Access app is critical to our companies function. The problem is that the file size for the .mde is now over 80 meg. It's becoming a major problem for people in the field to download a thick client 2 or 3 times a week. I either need a way to split up the application into smaller pieces or find something that will convert the Acess app to another language such as VB .NET or JAVA where we can have a thin client or where I can break the form in the Access app into smaller files. I would really appreciate any suggestions that anyone might have. Thank you in advance for your advice! Sounds like maybe the front end and back end are all in one .MDB and the people in the field are downloading the whole enchilada. Have I got that part right? If so, and based on your idea of doing something with VB.net, I'd guess that the people in the field have some sort of connection to the company LAN/WAN. If that's true, the quickest/easiest thing to try is separating the front end from the back end (i.e. a .MDB for each...). Then the users only have to download the front end once and they can be ODBC'd to the back end. Depending on how that works out and how many users are going to be hammering on it, the next thing I'd do is migrate the back to SQL Server and just change the ODBC links in the front end to point to the server tables. Once that is up and running, I'd look for performance issues and write stored procedures in the back end to resolve them. -- PeteCresswell |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Time to move on...
Is your application split? It should be split into FrontEnd and
BackEnd unless you have compelling reasons for not splitting it. I've done routines in Access to export data from related tables at a source location and to import that data at the destination location. That kind of thing allows you to transfer just the selected data. How much new data is actually involved in each of your 3 transfers per week? Couldn't be 80 meg. If I might be of help, please decode my address and send me your contact information. HTH -- -Larry- -- "PeterM" wrote in message ... I'm finally at the stage where I need to investigate other options. I have consultants in the field all over North America and our Access app is critical to our companies function. The problem is that the file size for the .mde is now over 80 meg. It's becoming a major problem for people in the field to download a thick client 2 or 3 times a week. I either need a way to split up the application into smaller pieces or find something that will convert the Acess app to another language such as VB .NET or JAVA where we can have a thin client or where I can break the form in the Access app into smaller files. I would really appreciate any suggestions that anyone might have. Thank you in advance for your advice! |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Time to move on...
"PeterM" wrote in message ... Actually, the 80 meg .mde is just the front end...we have our tables out on a server provided by a host provider. The app has over 125 forms, 300 queries and about 45 tables. So you're telling us that there are total changes to the front-end 2 or 3 times a week? I have 51 users and don't make that many front-end changes to the 12 apps I support every week. OK, here are your solutions: 1. Create an ASP front-end 2. Use a Terminal Server, build a folder for each user and have him/her connect to their own copy of the front-end on the Terminal Server. The queries and tables should not be a factor, if they are, in fact, linked, not local. 125 forms should not even approach 15 MB, unless they have images. 3. Take out the images. -- Arvin Meyer, MCP, MVP Microsoft Access Free Access downloads http://www.datastrat.com http://www.mvps.org/access |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Time to move on...
Yes, pls see my response to Pete Cresswell. It's split into a .mde front end
for using forms, reports and queries and the tables are connected via ODBC to a back end server. The 80 meg .mde contains just the forms, reports, queries, modules, etc. It changes frequently for enhancement requests. It's so large because it does our marketing, lead generation and reporting, timesheet, expense report, invoicing, purchase orders, skills matrix, pricebook, knowledgebase, customers, vendors, contacts, group calendar, etc. Any help would be appreciated. "Larry Daugherty" wrote: Is your application split? It should be split into FrontEnd and BackEnd unless you have compelling reasons for not splitting it. I've done routines in Access to export data from related tables at a source location and to import that data at the destination location. That kind of thing allows you to transfer just the selected data. How much new data is actually involved in each of your 3 transfers per week? Couldn't be 80 meg. If I might be of help, please decode my address and send me your contact information. HTH -- -Larry- -- "PeterM" wrote in message ... I'm finally at the stage where I need to investigate other options. I have consultants in the field all over North America and our Access app is critical to our companies function. The problem is that the file size for the .mde is now over 80 meg. It's becoming a major problem for people in the field to download a thick client 2 or 3 times a week. I either need a way to split up the application into smaller pieces or find something that will convert the Acess app to another language such as VB .NET or JAVA where we can have a thin client or where I can break the form in the Access app into smaller files. I would really appreciate any suggestions that anyone might have. Thank you in advance for your advice! |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Time to move on...
thanks for responding...please see me responses to Pete Creswell and Larry
Daugherty for an explanation. Any advice would be appreciated. "Rick Brandt" wrote: PeterM wrote: I'm finally at the stage where I need to investigate other options. I have consultants in the field all over North America and our Access app is critical to our companies function. The problem is that the file size for the .mde is now over 80 meg. It's becoming a major problem for people in the field to download a thick client 2 or 3 times a week. I either need a way to split up the application into smaller pieces or find something that will convert the Acess app to another language such as VB .NET or JAVA where we can have a thin client or where I can break the form in the Access app into smaller files. I would really appreciate any suggestions that anyone might have. Thank you in advance for your advice! Why do they have to download the MDE 2 or 3 times a week? -- I don't check the Email account attached to this message. Send instead to... RBrandt at Hunter dot com |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Time to move on...
Hi Peter,
After posting my solution I saw the rest of the thread and see that it solves a problem you don't have. Sorry about that. I don't know of any viable conversion tools from Access to anything. There is one outfit out there somewhere that promises conversion to VB. I believe I tried it back when VB3 was the target. It failed miserably. So, No. I do have other ideas but they are only relevant in terms of your business model and your application. Otherwise you're asking us to answer your specific questions without a clue as to relevance. What is your application? What is its domain? What problems does it solve? What's your business model. Why do you have people in the field? How do they interact with your customer base? What the bloomin' H... is going on that you need 3 changes to your application each week? With that degree of instability, why are you using an MDE? I know, it's because you don't want someone to see your commented VBA. Who; your field reps? Your customers? Both? If the distrust ("trust but verify") is of your field reps, can they be bonded ("trust but insure")? If so there are workable solutions that involve their using MDB, converting to MDE, etc... Diplomats find nice ways to candy coat things. A skill I never learned: Take all of the following with a large grain of salt and the belief that I really do intend to help. YOU are the source of your problems! :-) You wrote the code that swelled to that huge 80 meg. You had the vision to see what could be and the drive to get things done and sold and out there serving your customers. However, I'm going to assume that you did a lot of work along the way that was done in the quickest, simplest way you could and that you then Pressed On! For example: I can't believe that your application actually requires 300 discrete and separate queries! Some of those have to be simple variations on a theme and good candidates for collapsing into parameterized queries. FWIW the query window on most of my applications is empty. I embed most queries into their forms and reports. 125 forms? mmm...maybe. In my ignorance of your application I will still hazard a guess that the front end should be less than half that size. On your own you're unlikely to quickly recognize and resolve the problems. Coming from the Cobol world you probably brought a lot of Cobol thinking with you. In most instances that's good because most of what you knew there is true in Access as well. However you probably brought over and applied many things that shouldn't be applied in Access but that worked. I don't know what those things might be. I never danced Cobol. I've looked at some Cobol code at the insistence of one of my mainframe buddies. I could follow it but I never got into it. If you carried forward the good things you should have been using in the Cobol world then you documented things as you began; at least to the point of Problem Statement, Product Specification and Functional Specification. With 3 changes per week you may not have been able to keep things current. I recommend that you tweak the Specifications to reflect what's going on now and to then look around for an Access expert. I don't mean just someone who makes a living selling services using Access but a consultant with many successful projects who is capable of quickly mastering the business arena of your application. Give her or him the updated specifications and a verbal walk through of everything just as though you were hiring that person to replace you as the Software Engineer on this project. Tell that person that you would like them to become familiar with the specifications and to then give you a preliminary design for an Access based product. Tell them they have a week to get it done and that they have unrestricted access to you. That means that when they're interacting with you the phone doesn't ring and there will be no taps at the door. If they really whine and cry give them two weeks - same conditions. They will need particular help identifying the entities in play. Don't look at their work until the agreed time is up. At the end of the agreed upon time, look at their preliminary design. If it's significantly different from yours, find out why. Take everything said here with the idea that it's intended to help you. I do believe you can find workable solutions while staying within Access. HTH -- -Larry- -- "PeterM" wrote in message ... Actually, the 80 meg .mde is just the front end...we have our tables out on a server provided by a host provider. The app has over 125 forms, 300 queries and about 45 tables. Actually we're a very small company and have only about 10 people in the field accessing this app. They all have ODBC connections setup and that's how they get to the tables. All they need is an ISP connection, usually in a hotel or at home and the ODBC connection directs them to the back end tables. We're restricted to MySQL on the host provider on the back end for now, but ODBC handles it perfectly. I'm an old COBOL developer years ago and have taught myself Access over the past 3 years. So I don't look forward to learning another language and developing another architecture, but it's looking more and more like I need to do that. Do you know of any decent conversion tools or have any other ideas? thanks for your response Pete "(PeteCresswell)" wrote: Per PeterM: I'm finally at the stage where I need to investigate other options. I have consultants in the field all over North America and our Access app is critical to our companies function. The problem is that the file size for the .mde is now over 80 meg. It's becoming a major problem for people in the field to download a thick client 2 or 3 times a week. I either need a way to split up the application into smaller pieces or find something that will convert the Acess app to another language such as VB .NET or JAVA where we can have a thin client or where I can break the form in the Access app into smaller files. I would really appreciate any suggestions that anyone might have. Thank you in advance for your advice! Sounds like maybe the front end and back end are all in one .MDB and the people in the field are downloading the whole enchilada. Have I got that part right? If so, and based on your idea of doing something with VB.net, I'd guess that the people in the field have some sort of connection to the company LAN/WAN. If that's true, the quickest/easiest thing to try is separating the front end from the back end (i.e. a .MDB for each...). Then the users only have to download the front end once and they can be ODBC'd to the back end. Depending on how that works out and how many users are going to be hammering on it, the next thing I'd do is migrate the back to SQL Server and just change the ODBC links in the front end to point to the server tables. Once that is up and running, I'd look for performance issues and write stored procedures in the back end to resolve them. -- PeteCresswell |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Time to move on...
Our application is about that big (80). Zipped, it is about
12 meg. Compressed to self extracting executable with rar, then zipped, it is about 10. The application has a shell mdb/mde, 4-12 application mde's at 1-10MB, and a library mde at 10MB. Each application module references the library mde (tools, references). The shell references all of the application modules and the library module. For ease of installation and support, we require all clients to install to the specified program files folder. When using the shell as an mdb, we can replace any application mde, provided the library mde does not change. If you use application mdb modules, then you could also update the library module without changing all application modules. Or you might not have enough shared code to justify a library module. We also have code in DLL's: these may be updated independently of the mde's. Within the application modules, some forms call other forms. From the shell, application modules are called from the menu system. (david) "PeterM" wrote in message ... I'm finally at the stage where I need to investigate other options. I have consultants in the field all over North America and our Access app is critical to our companies function. The problem is that the file size for the .mde is now over 80 meg. It's becoming a major problem for people in the field to download a thick client 2 or 3 times a week. I either need a way to split up the application into smaller pieces or find something that will convert the Acess app to another language such as VB .NET or JAVA where we can have a thin client or where I can break the form in the Access app into smaller files. I would really appreciate any suggestions that anyone might have. Thank you in advance for your advice! |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Visio Shortcuts | [email protected] | Visio | 1 | December 28th, 2006 11:28 PM |
Outlook 2003 time zone handling errors | Jonathan | Calendar | 3 | January 3rd, 2006 04:20 AM |
sort tabs in a workbook other than one at a time with move or cop. | Hoflinger | Worksheet Functions | 1 | February 2nd, 2005 04:41 PM |
!!STRANGE!! - Mail Merge - When i move my mouse it runs in double time! | Jado | Mailmerge | 3 | August 20th, 2004 07:04 PM |
Outlook 2003 Terminal Server Time Zone issue | Robert Strom | Calendar | 2 | May 26th, 2004 10:50 PM |