A Microsoft Office (Excel, Word) forum. OfficeFrustration

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » OfficeFrustration forum » Microsoft Access » Setting Up & Running Reports
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read  

Access 2007 Reporting Versus Crystal Reports



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old April 16th, 2010, 06:41 PM posted to microsoft.public.access.reports
Brad
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 943
Default Access 2007 Reporting Versus Crystal Reports

Recently the topic of Crystal Reports was brought up. We are a small firm
with a small IT budget.

Our data lives in SQL Server, Access 2007, Excel, and in a purchased
package’s Pervasive Database which we can access nicely via ODBC.

We currently do not have Crystal Reports, or any other report writer other
than the reporting features that are integrated into Access 2007.

I took a stand and said that I believe that Access 2007 will be able to
handle our reporting needs. We currently have very few reports and it
appears that our reporting needs are quite basic.

The bulk of our data lives in SQL Server, but we do not have SQL Server
Reporting Services available.

Are there issues that I should be aware of when starting to use Access 2007
Reporting against SQL Server? So far, our initial experiments have worked
nicely, but we have only started to scratch the surface.

If we are heading down the wrong path, I would like to know sooner rather
than later.

Thanks in advance for your advice and insights.

Brad
  #2  
Old April 16th, 2010, 09:07 PM posted to microsoft.public.access.reports
Mark Andrews[_4_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 169
Default Access 2007 Reporting Versus Crystal Reports

Do you need web-based reporting at some point would be the biggest question.
If so reporting services
would be a better alternative. Access and the Crystal report designer are
fairly similar in capabilities.

You can use linked tables or pass-thru queries in Access to do reporting off
SQL Server data. Pass-thru queries will
give better performance because the query is run on sql server and only the
result goes over the wire, however there
are a few things you can't do if you go this route (some sub-reports won't
work).

I would use Access 2007 over Crystal Reports any day of the week.

My two cents,

--
Mark Andrews
RPT Software
http://www.rptsoftware.com
http://www.donationmanagementsoftware.com

"Brad" wrote in message
...
Recently the topic of Crystal Reports was brought up. We are a small firm
with a small IT budget.

Our data lives in SQL Server, Access 2007, Excel, and in a purchased
package’s Pervasive Database which we can access nicely via ODBC.

We currently do not have Crystal Reports, or any other report writer other
than the reporting features that are integrated into Access 2007.

I took a stand and said that I believe that Access 2007 will be able to
handle our reporting needs. We currently have very few reports and it
appears that our reporting needs are quite basic.

The bulk of our data lives in SQL Server, but we do not have SQL Server
Reporting Services available.

Are there issues that I should be aware of when starting to use Access
2007
Reporting against SQL Server? So far, our initial experiments have worked
nicely, but we have only started to scratch the surface.

If we are heading down the wrong path, I would like to know sooner rather
than later.

Thanks in advance for your advice and insights.

Brad


  #3  
Old April 17th, 2010, 02:53 AM posted to microsoft.public.access.reports
Brad
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 943
Default Access 2007 Reporting Versus Crystal Reports

Mark,

Thanks for your help with this question.

Brad


"Mark Andrews" wrote:

Do you need web-based reporting at some point would be the biggest question.
If so reporting services
would be a better alternative. Access and the Crystal report designer are
fairly similar in capabilities.

You can use linked tables or pass-thru queries in Access to do reporting off
SQL Server data. Pass-thru queries will
give better performance because the query is run on sql server and only the
result goes over the wire, however there
are a few things you can't do if you go this route (some sub-reports won't
work).

I would use Access 2007 over Crystal Reports any day of the week.

My two cents,

--
Mark Andrews
RPT Software
http://www.rptsoftware.com
http://www.donationmanagementsoftware.com

"Brad" wrote in message
...
Recently the topic of Crystal Reports was brought up. We are a small firm
with a small IT budget.

Our data lives in SQL Server, Access 2007, Excel, and in a purchased
package’s Pervasive Database which we can access nicely via ODBC.

We currently do not have Crystal Reports, or any other report writer other
than the reporting features that are integrated into Access 2007.

I took a stand and said that I believe that Access 2007 will be able to
handle our reporting needs. We currently have very few reports and it
appears that our reporting needs are quite basic.

The bulk of our data lives in SQL Server, but we do not have SQL Server
Reporting Services available.

Are there issues that I should be aware of when starting to use Access
2007
Reporting against SQL Server? So far, our initial experiments have worked
nicely, but we have only started to scratch the surface.

If we are heading down the wrong path, I would like to know sooner rather
than later.

Thanks in advance for your advice and insights.

Brad


.

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:48 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 OfficeFrustration.
The comments are property of their posters.