If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Deploying Office 2000 AND 2003 via GPO
I'm trying to deploy Office 2003 via GPO, and then deploy Office 2000 AFTER
2003 has been installed. Here's why: We want to use Microsoft Photo Editor instead of Microsoft Office Picture Manager. I have successfully deployed Office 2003 via GPO, and then manually installed MS Photo Editor from an Office 2000 Administrative Installation Point. It works great. Picture Manager and Photo Editor coexist peacefully, and Photo Editor is the default App, which is what we want. So I created an MST for the Office 2000 AIP that ONLY installs Photo Editor, and tried to push both packages out via GPO. The problem is, I can't find a way to force the Office 2003 package to always install BEFORE the Office 2000 package. On the test I just tried, on a machine freshly imaged with a clean image, Office 2000 installed FIRST. The result was the following: not only did Office 2003 remove Photo Editor when it installed Picture Manager...it apparently ONLY installed Picture Manager. None of the other Office 2003 apps had a shortcut in the start menu. No Outlook, Word, Excel...nada. I suspect the applications are actually there because I watched the machine install "managed software Microsoft Office 2003", and it took quite a while. But this will not work as a deployment scenario. Interestingly, I did the same test on a not-so-pristine image yesterday with different results. Both Office 2003 and Photo Editor had been deployed and uninstalled several times on this machine; both products were not currently installed at the time of the test. On that test, Office 2003 installed first (and VERY quickly, since it had lived there before), followed by Office 2000 (Photo Editor). The result was perfect, just what I wanted: A full install of Office 2003 that included Microsoft Photo Editor as Windows' default photo-editing application. After all this explaination, my question is the following: is there a way I can force the installation of a particular software package before another? Can I make the installation of one conditional upon the presence of another? Do I have any way to control the order of installation of software packages? Thanks in advance, Bryan |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Hi Bryan.
The deployment of packages via GPO was done in randomized order, you cannot configure what package will intalled first. "Bryan Linton" wrote: I'm trying to deploy Office 2003 via GPO, and then deploy Office 2000 AFTER 2003 has been installed. Here's why: We want to use Microsoft Photo Editor instead of Microsoft Office Picture Manager. I have successfully deployed Office 2003 via GPO, and then manually installed MS Photo Editor from an Office 2000 Administrative Installation Point. It works great. Picture Manager and Photo Editor coexist peacefully, and Photo Editor is the default App, which is what we want. So I created an MST for the Office 2000 AIP that ONLY installs Photo Editor, and tried to push both packages out via GPO. The problem is, I can't find a way to force the Office 2003 package to always install BEFORE the Office 2000 package. On the test I just tried, on a machine freshly imaged with a clean image, Office 2000 installed FIRST. The result was the following: not only did Office 2003 remove Photo Editor when it installed Picture Manager...it apparently ONLY installed Picture Manager. None of the other Office 2003 apps had a shortcut in the start menu. No Outlook, Word, Excel...nada. I suspect the applications are actually there because I watched the machine install "managed software Microsoft Office 2003", and it took quite a while. But this will not work as a deployment scenario. Interestingly, I did the same test on a not-so-pristine image yesterday with different results. Both Office 2003 and Photo Editor had been deployed and uninstalled several times on this machine; both products were not currently installed at the time of the test. On that test, Office 2003 installed first (and VERY quickly, since it had lived there before), followed by Office 2000 (Photo Editor). The result was perfect, just what I wanted: A full install of Office 2003 that included Microsoft Photo Editor as Windows' default photo-editing application. After all this explaination, my question is the following: is there a way I can force the installation of a particular software package before another? Can I make the installation of one conditional upon the presence of another? Do I have any way to control the order of installation of software packages? Thanks in advance, Bryan |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
In which case I would see if chaining the install would work.
http://office.microsoft.com/en-us/as...402051033.aspx "Gadi" wrote in message ... Hi Bryan. The deployment of packages via GPO was done in randomized order, you cannot configure what package will intalled first. "Bryan Linton" wrote: I'm trying to deploy Office 2003 via GPO, and then deploy Office 2000 AFTER 2003 has been installed. Here's why: We want to use Microsoft Photo Editor instead of Microsoft Office Picture Manager. I have successfully deployed Office 2003 via GPO, and then manually installed MS Photo Editor from an Office 2000 Administrative Installation Point. It works great. Picture Manager and Photo Editor coexist peacefully, and Photo Editor is the default App, which is what we want. So I created an MST for the Office 2000 AIP that ONLY installs Photo Editor, and tried to push both packages out via GPO. The problem is, I can't find a way to force the Office 2003 package to always install BEFORE the Office 2000 package. On the test I just tried, on a machine freshly imaged with a clean image, Office 2000 installed FIRST. The result was the following: not only did Office 2003 remove Photo Editor when it installed Picture Manager...it apparently ONLY installed Picture Manager. None of the other Office 2003 apps had a shortcut in the start menu. No Outlook, Word, Excel...nada. I suspect the applications are actually there because I watched the machine install "managed software Microsoft Office 2003", and it took quite a while. But this will not work as a deployment scenario. Interestingly, I did the same test on a not-so-pristine image yesterday with different results. Both Office 2003 and Photo Editor had been deployed and uninstalled several times on this machine; both products were not currently installed at the time of the test. On that test, Office 2003 installed first (and VERY quickly, since it had lived there before), followed by Office 2000 (Photo Editor). The result was perfect, just what I wanted: A full install of Office 2003 that included Microsoft Photo Editor as Windows' default photo-editing application. After all this explaination, my question is the following: is there a way I can force the installation of a particular software package before another? Can I make the installation of one conditional upon the presence of another? Do I have any way to control the order of installation of software packages? Thanks in advance, Bryan |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Thanks Neo. Looks like I'll have to find another solution; this excerpt
from your linked article sums it up: "Using Group Policy software installation "Group Policy software installation works directly with the MSI file and bypasses Office 2003 Setup and the Setup.ini file when assigning or publishing packages. For this reason, you cannot use Setup.exe to chain Office 2003 installations when you assign or publish packages. Instead, Microsoft Windows deploys Office 2003, the Office 2003 Multilingual User Interface Pack, and other Office-related packages separately and in random order. Because Office 2003 must be installed first, before a MUI Pack installation can succeed, you cannot use chaining with Group Policy software installation to combine these installations." Thanks for the good resource. Bryan "neo [mvp outlook]" wrote in message ... In which case I would see if chaining the install would work. http://office.microsoft.com/en-us/as...402051033.aspx "Gadi" wrote in message ... Hi Bryan. The deployment of packages via GPO was done in randomized order, you cannot configure what package will intalled first. "Bryan Linton" wrote: I'm trying to deploy Office 2003 via GPO, and then deploy Office 2000 AFTER 2003 has been installed. Here's why: We want to use Microsoft Photo Editor instead of Microsoft Office Picture Manager. I have successfully deployed Office 2003 via GPO, and then manually installed MS Photo Editor from an Office 2000 Administrative Installation Point. It works great. Picture Manager and Photo Editor coexist peacefully, and Photo Editor is the default App, which is what we want. So I created an MST for the Office 2000 AIP that ONLY installs Photo Editor, and tried to push both packages out via GPO. The problem is, I can't find a way to force the Office 2003 package to always install BEFORE the Office 2000 package. On the test I just tried, on a machine freshly imaged with a clean image, Office 2000 installed FIRST. The result was the following: not only did Office 2003 remove Photo Editor when it installed Picture Manager...it apparently ONLY installed Picture Manager. None of the other Office 2003 apps had a shortcut in the start menu. No Outlook, Word, Excel...nada. I suspect the applications are actually there because I watched the machine install "managed software Microsoft Office 2003", and it took quite a while. But this will not work as a deployment scenario. Interestingly, I did the same test on a not-so-pristine image yesterday with different results. Both Office 2003 and Photo Editor had been deployed and uninstalled several times on this machine; both products were not currently installed at the time of the test. On that test, Office 2003 installed first (and VERY quickly, since it had lived there before), followed by Office 2000 (Photo Editor). The result was perfect, just what I wanted: A full install of Office 2003 that included Microsoft Photo Editor as Windows' default photo-editing application. After all this explaination, my question is the following: is there a way I can force the installation of a particular software package before another? Can I make the installation of one conditional upon the presence of another? Do I have any way to control the order of installation of software packages? Thanks in advance, Bryan |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Will I lose Access 2002 if I install Office 2003 | Mark | Setup, Installing & Configuration | 5 | September 1st, 2004 05:51 PM |
Office 2003 / Office XP Shortcut Bar | Marc Bressman | Setup, Installing & Configuration | 6 | June 26th, 2004 08:42 AM |
Office 2003 / Office XP Shortcut Bar | Marc Bressman | General Discussions | 6 | June 26th, 2004 08:42 AM |
Productkey problem when installing office 2003 on network | Stefan Schreurs | Setup, Installing & Configuration | 1 | June 1st, 2004 11:16 PM |
Office 2003 and Office 2000/97 coexist on same PC? | John | General Discussions | 3 | May 6th, 2004 12:36 PM |