If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
FYI Word 2007 users who must have menus
I think Microsoft has already created the two alternative versions you wish;
the latter is Word 2003. -- Suzanne S. Barnhill Microsoft MVP (Word) Words into Type Fairhope, Alabama USA Word MVP FAQ site: http://word.mvps.org Email cannot be acknowledged; please post all follow-ups to the newsgroup so all may benefit. "Larry" wrote in message ... That's a cheap shot, Greg, and it's beside the point. I'm not a software designer. My criticisms of the Word 2007 monstrosity stand. Hey, if MS created two alternative versions of Word, one for people who really like the design of Word 2007 and really enjoy spending months figuring out how to use it, and one for people who expect a basic product into which they've invested years of their lives to remain in existence, then I'd have no problem with that. Larry "Greg Maxey" wrote in message ... Larry, I have read many of your posts and your disappointment with Word2007 is clearly evident. To be blunt you are beginning to sound like a broken record. I am not thrilled by it either, but there are many features that I like and the more I use it my initial ire continues to diminish. I have spent a little time playing with RibbonX custimaztion and while I am far from proficient, I have been able to create some custom tabs and I am actually quite satisfied with the result. I sent you an e-mail (or tried) offering to send you a sample document with some simple ribbon cusotomizations. I will still do that if you are interested. Do you have a garage? If I recall correctly, Microsoft was born in a garage. Why don't you design a word processing application in your garage or similiar small space that satisfies all of your tastes and requirement and market it? If you pull it off and there really are millions of users and thousands of companies that feel the same as you then your fortune is made. -- Greg Maxey/Word MVP See: http://gregmaxey.mvps.org/word_tips.htm For some helpful tips using Word. Larry wrote: Here's hoping that millions of users and thousands of companies react as you have done, since apparently that is the only thing that will persuade the people at Microsoft what a hideous catastrophe Word 2007 is. Larry "CS Hayes" wrote in message ... FYI again I am not very interested in old tool bars for new programs. I have been using 2007 trial and sadly I'm not impressed. I do understand that I will have to learn this software to be competitive in todays workforce but I don't like it. I've spent years learning how to manipulate software via menus and now I have to relearn how to do it via ribbons (which is a fancy word for "over sized tool bar.") I'm going to go to 2003 on my system once the trial runs out. Here is an interesting idea: since someone can program a new tool bar for 2007 could someone program an interface for language compatibility with .NET for VB6? I think this would be something a lot of people would be interested in. -- Chris Hayes Still a beginner (only 12 years) "Cindy M." wrote: Hi Chris, And there's a more sophisticated tool that's just come out here. It includes what the Chinese is offering (the "Lite" version), plus one that lets you customize the menus, create your own toolbars, and add your own macros and AutoText. The toolbar can also be floated. What's more, you can save each set of customizations - including where the toolbars are located - in individual documents. It costs 19.95 for a single license, with discounts for volume licenses. And you can get 5% off by using the coupon code MVPCINDY http://www.toolbartoggle.com For those of you who must have the drop down menus fear no more. A chinese developer has created an Add In for Office and it's $29.00 (those folks are becoming quite the capitalists...) http://www.pcworld.com/article/id,130635/article.html Where there's a need there's a dollar. Cindy Meister INTER-Solutions, Switzerland http://homepage.swissonline.ch/cindymeister (last update Jun 17 2005) http://www.word.mvps.org This reply is posted in the Newsgroup; please post any follow question or reply in the newsgroup and not by e-mail :-) |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
FYI Word 2007 users who must have menus
The "cheap shot", Larry, is spending a limited amount of time using Word
2007, forming quick and non-researched opinions, and then criticizing it every chance you get. I'm sure if I spent 5 to 10 minutes using "Larry's Word", and if I were one to form quick and non-researched opinions, I'd think it was hideous, a catastrophe, and a monstrosity - all because I haven't taken the time to use it. What you say takes months to learn really doesn't take that long at all. Now, I spent months learning about the new features (which is true of any new version), but I adapted to the UI fairly quickly. FWIW, I've been using the Office applications, with the menus/toolbars, since 1985, starting with Excel on a Mac. I went from using SuperCalc and WordStar with the slash commands and I couldn't imagine how using a mouse would help me work faster than my trusty keyboard navigation! But once I got the hang of using a mouse I never looked back. The UI you love was designed for 1989, just as the slash command nagivation was designed for early computer applications. A lot has changed since then and the programs outgrew the menu/toolbar system. I'm surprised they didn't do this long ago. I think the bottom line is, if you prefer to drive your 1950 Chevy with no air conditioning, manual steering, manual transmission, and drum brakes, then by all means, keep driving it. I prefer to drive my new convertible with air conditioning, automatic steering, split shift transmission (can switch to automatic or manual), anti-lock brakes, heated leather seats, GPS, and 4-disc CD changer. I like my car and I'm tired of someone merely kicking the tires and making assumptions about it. Please post all follow-up questions to the newsgroup. Requests for assistance by email can not be acknowledged. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Beth Melton "Larry" wrote in message ... That's a cheap shot, Greg, and it's beside the point. I'm not a software designer. My criticisms of the Word 2007 monstrosity stand. Hey, if MS created two alternative versions of Word, one for people who really like the design of Word 2007 and really enjoy spending months figuring out how to use it, and one for people who expect a basic product into which they've invested years of their lives to remain in existence, then I'd have no problem with that. Larry "Greg Maxey" wrote in message ... Larry, I have read many of your posts and your disappointment with Word2007 is clearly evident. To be blunt you are beginning to sound like a broken record. I am not thrilled by it either, but there are many features that I like and the more I use it my initial ire continues to diminish. I have spent a little time playing with RibbonX custimaztion and while I am far from proficient, I have been able to create some custom tabs and I am actually quite satisfied with the result. I sent you an e-mail (or tried) offering to send you a sample document with some simple ribbon cusotomizations. I will still do that if you are interested. Do you have a garage? If I recall correctly, Microsoft was born in a garage. Why don't you design a word processing application in your garage or similiar small space that satisfies all of your tastes and requirement and market it? If you pull it off and there really are millions of users and thousands of companies that feel the same as you then your fortune is made. -- Greg Maxey/Word MVP See: http://gregmaxey.mvps.org/word_tips.htm For some helpful tips using Word. Larry wrote: Here's hoping that millions of users and thousands of companies react as you have done, since apparently that is the only thing that will persuade the people at Microsoft what a hideous catastrophe Word 2007 is. Larry "CS Hayes" wrote in message ... FYI again I am not very interested in old tool bars for new programs. I have been using 2007 trial and sadly I'm not impressed. I do understand that I will have to learn this software to be competitive in todays workforce but I don't like it. I've spent years learning how to manipulate software via menus and now I have to relearn how to do it via ribbons (which is a fancy word for "over sized tool bar.") I'm going to go to 2003 on my system once the trial runs out. Here is an interesting idea: since someone can program a new tool bar for 2007 could someone program an interface for language compatibility with .NET for VB6? I think this would be something a lot of people would be interested in. -- Chris Hayes Still a beginner (only 12 years) "Cindy M." wrote: Hi Chris, And there's a more sophisticated tool that's just come out here. It includes what the Chinese is offering (the "Lite" version), plus one that lets you customize the menus, create your own toolbars, and add your own macros and AutoText. The toolbar can also be floated. What's more, you can save each set of customizations - including where the toolbars are located - in individual documents. It costs 19.95 for a single license, with discounts for volume licenses. And you can get 5% off by using the coupon code MVPCINDY http://www.toolbartoggle.com For those of you who must have the drop down menus fear no more. A chinese developer has created an Add In for Office and it's $29.00 (those folks are becoming quite the capitalists...) http://www.pcworld.com/article/id,130635/article.html Where there's a need there's a dollar. Cindy Meister INTER-Solutions, Switzerland http://homepage.swissonline.ch/cindymeister (last update Jun 17 2005) http://www.word.mvps.org This reply is posted in the Newsgroup; please post any follow question or reply in the newsgroup and not by e-mail :-) |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
FYI Word 2007 users who must have menus
Sun, 22 Apr 2007 15:57:34 -0400 from Larry :
"Greg Maxey" wrote in message ... Larry, I have read many of your posts and your disappointment with Word2007 is clearly evident. To be blunt you are beginning to sound like a broken record. That's a cheap shot, Greg, and it's beside the point. I'm not a software designer. My criticisms of the Word 2007 monstrosity stand. I'm sure Greg can defend himself, but for the record I think he's spot on. If I had written the comment, I'd have said the same thing but would have omitted "are beginning to". Word 2007 is what it is, like it or not. I don't say everything about the Ribbon is better than everything about the old menus. But if you devote half as much energy to getting comfortable with the Ribbon as you have to kvetching about it, you may find that it's not as bad as you think, *and* you'll probably become an expert. -- Stan Brown, Oak Road Systems, Tompkins County, New York, USA http://OakRoadSystems.com/ |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
FYI Word 2007 users who must have menus
There are a lot of people frequenting this group who want to say what I'm
saying, but comments like the above make them afraid to say it. There's an orthodoxy shaping up here that is intended to cow anyone from criticizing Word 2007. I respect all the Word MVPs, but I will continue to criticize Word 2007 as I see fit. Suzanne says that Word 2003 is the alternative to 2007. But as everyone knows, as hardware and software continue to "progress," or at least to change, it gets harder to keep using old programs, and there is a continual pressure to adapt to the most recent programs. How long can people go on using 2003, before it is left behind by, say, further changes in Word's programming language, which will force them to use some "descendant" of Word 2007 that has Word 2007's interface? Speaking of grousing about Microsoft's latest generation of "innovations" which includes Word 2007 and Windows Vista, over at the Windows Vista group there is fierce outspoken protest against Vista coming from a lot of parties. However, I'm not recommending that this group become like that group, where there is a lot of nastiness. Larry "Stan Brown" wrote in message t... Sun, 22 Apr 2007 15:57:34 -0400 from Larry : "Greg Maxey" wrote in message ... Larry, I have read many of your posts and your disappointment with Word2007 is clearly evident. To be blunt you are beginning to sound like a broken record. That's a cheap shot, Greg, and it's beside the point. I'm not a software designer. My criticisms of the Word 2007 monstrosity stand. I'm sure Greg can defend himself, but for the record I think he's spot on. If I had written the comment, I'd have said the same thing but would have omitted "are beginning to". Word 2007 is what it is, like it or not. I don't say everything about the Ribbon is better than everything about the old menus. But if you devote half as much energy to getting comfortable with the Ribbon as you have to kvetching about it, you may find that it's not as bad as you think, *and* you'll probably become an expert. -- Stan Brown, Oak Road Systems, Tompkins County, New York, USA http://OakRoadSystems.com/ |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
FYI Word 2007 users who must have menus
Beth, after you said that Word 2007 is really good once you get into it, I
asked you how you could justify certain features of Word 2007, such as the fact that basic controls and dialogs, which used to be two simple steps away from the user interface, are now several awkward steps away from the user interface. You declined to reply, on the basis that it would be a waste of breath because anything you said would not be persuasive to me. For you, who refused to answer my questions and to defend your own position in this discussion, to accuse me of making cheap shots for making the arguments for which you had no answer, is ridiculous. "Beth Melton" wrote in message ... The "cheap shot", Larry, is spending a limited amount of time using Word 2007, forming quick and non-researched opinions, and then criticizing it every chance you get. I'm sure if I spent 5 to 10 minutes using "Larry's Word", and if I were one to form quick and non-researched opinions, I'd think it was hideous, a catastrophe, and a monstrosity - all because I haven't taken the time to use it. What you say takes months to learn really doesn't take that long at all. Now, I spent months learning about the new features (which is true of any new version), but I adapted to the UI fairly quickly. FWIW, I've been using the Office applications, with the menus/toolbars, since 1985, starting with Excel on a Mac. I went from using SuperCalc and WordStar with the slash commands and I couldn't imagine how using a mouse would help me work faster than my trusty keyboard navigation! But once I got the hang of using a mouse I never looked back. The UI you love was designed for 1989, just as the slash command nagivation was designed for early computer applications. A lot has changed since then and the programs outgrew the menu/toolbar system. I'm surprised they didn't do this long ago. I think the bottom line is, if you prefer to drive your 1950 Chevy with no air conditioning, manual steering, manual transmission, and drum brakes, then by all means, keep driving it. I prefer to drive my new convertible with air conditioning, automatic steering, split shift transmission (can switch to automatic or manual), anti-lock brakes, heated leather seats, GPS, and 4-disc CD changer. I like my car and I'm tired of someone merely kicking the tires and making assumptions about it. Please post all follow-up questions to the newsgroup. Requests for assistance by email can not be acknowledged. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Beth Melton "Larry" wrote in message ... That's a cheap shot, Greg, and it's beside the point. I'm not a software designer. My criticisms of the Word 2007 monstrosity stand. Hey, if MS created two alternative versions of Word, one for people who really like the design of Word 2007 and really enjoy spending months figuring out how to use it, and one for people who expect a basic product into which they've invested years of their lives to remain in existence, then I'd have no problem with that. Larry "Greg Maxey" wrote in message ... Larry, I have read many of your posts and your disappointment with Word2007 is clearly evident. To be blunt you are beginning to sound like a broken record. I am not thrilled by it either, but there are many features that I like and the more I use it my initial ire continues to diminish. I have spent a little time playing with RibbonX custimaztion and while I am far from proficient, I have been able to create some custom tabs and I am actually quite satisfied with the result. I sent you an e-mail (or tried) offering to send you a sample document with some simple ribbon cusotomizations. I will still do that if you are interested. Do you have a garage? If I recall correctly, Microsoft was born in a garage. Why don't you design a word processing application in your garage or similiar small space that satisfies all of your tastes and requirement and market it? If you pull it off and there really are millions of users and thousands of companies that feel the same as you then your fortune is made. -- Greg Maxey/Word MVP See: http://gregmaxey.mvps.org/word_tips.htm For some helpful tips using Word. Larry wrote: Here's hoping that millions of users and thousands of companies react as you have done, since apparently that is the only thing that will persuade the people at Microsoft what a hideous catastrophe Word 2007 is. Larry "CS Hayes" wrote in message ... FYI again I am not very interested in old tool bars for new programs. I have been using 2007 trial and sadly I'm not impressed. I do understand that I will have to learn this software to be competitive in todays workforce but I don't like it. I've spent years learning how to manipulate software via menus and now I have to relearn how to do it via ribbons (which is a fancy word for "over sized tool bar.") I'm going to go to 2003 on my system once the trial runs out. Here is an interesting idea: since someone can program a new tool bar for 2007 could someone program an interface for language compatibility with .NET for VB6? I think this would be something a lot of people would be interested in. -- Chris Hayes Still a beginner (only 12 years) "Cindy M." wrote: Hi Chris, And there's a more sophisticated tool that's just come out here. It includes what the Chinese is offering (the "Lite" version), plus one that lets you customize the menus, create your own toolbars, and add your own macros and AutoText. The toolbar can also be floated. What's more, you can save each set of customizations - including where the toolbars are located - in individual documents. It costs 19.95 for a single license, with discounts for volume licenses. And you can get 5% off by using the coupon code MVPCINDY http://www.toolbartoggle.com For those of you who must have the drop down menus fear no more. A chinese developer has created an Add In for Office and it's $29.00 (those folks are becoming quite the capitalists...) http://www.pcworld.com/article/id,130635/article.html Where there's a need there's a dollar. Cindy Meister INTER-Solutions, Switzerland http://homepage.swissonline.ch/cindymeister (last update Jun 17 2005) http://www.word.mvps.org This reply is posted in the Newsgroup; please post any follow question or reply in the newsgroup and not by e-mail :-) |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
FYI Word 2007 users who must have menus
On Sun, 22 Apr 2007 02:08:38 -0400, "Greg Maxey"
wrote: Larry, I have read many of your posts and your disappointment with Word2007 is clearly evident. To be blunt you are beginning to sound like a broken record. I am not thrilled by it either, but there are many features that I like and the more I use it my initial ire continues to diminish. I have spent a little time playing with RibbonX custimaztion and while I am far from proficient, I have been able to create some custom tabs and I am actually quite satisfied with the result. I sent you an e-mail (or tried) offering to send you a sample document with some simple ribbon cusotomizations. I will still do that if you are interested. I think you have completely missed Larry's point. If you like the new product or if you are willing to spend hours learning new techniques, that's great. Larry's point is that MS has forced him to do so. If he's like me, Word is a tool, not a career. I thank Larry for being so vocal. I just want the damned thing to work. I hate conversions and releases because there is always down time and adjustments. I have a business to run and I want reliable tools that don't require more time for me to learn them than they require to do the job. MS is a huge multi-gazillionaire company. They can provide a compatibility mode for new releases so that I can have it work exactly like it used to if I want it to. MS has been arrogant toward its users in the past. Is this another example? Do you have a garage? If I recall correctly, Microsoft was born in a garage. Why don't you design a word processing application in your garage or similiar small space that satisfies all of your tastes and requirement and market it? If you pull it off and there really are millions of users and thousands of companies that feel the same as you then your fortune is made. Now that is a really stupid comment. -- Running Word 2000 SP-3 on Windows 2000 |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
FYI Word 2007 users who must have menus
I suspect that the next version of Word may take some "backward" steps to
accommodate those who were not ready for it. Holding fast with Word 2003 now and then upgrading to Word 14 may be the best plan. -- Suzanne S. Barnhill Microsoft MVP (Word) Words into Type Fairhope, Alabama USA Word MVP FAQ site: http://word.mvps.org Email cannot be acknowledged; please post all follow-ups to the newsgroup so all may benefit. "Larry" wrote in message ... There are a lot of people frequenting this group who want to say what I'm saying, but comments like the above make them afraid to say it. There's an orthodoxy shaping up here that is intended to cow anyone from criticizing Word 2007. I respect all the Word MVPs, but I will continue to criticize Word 2007 as I see fit. Suzanne says that Word 2003 is the alternative to 2007. But as everyone knows, as hardware and software continue to "progress," or at least to change, it gets harder to keep using old programs, and there is a continual pressure to adapt to the most recent programs. How long can people go on using 2003, before it is left behind by, say, further changes in Word's programming language, which will force them to use some "descendant" of Word 2007 that has Word 2007's interface? Speaking of grousing about Microsoft's latest generation of "innovations" which includes Word 2007 and Windows Vista, over at the Windows Vista group there is fierce outspoken protest against Vista coming from a lot of parties. However, I'm not recommending that this group become like that group, where there is a lot of nastiness. Larry "Stan Brown" wrote in message t... Sun, 22 Apr 2007 15:57:34 -0400 from Larry : "Greg Maxey" wrote in message ... Larry, I have read many of your posts and your disappointment with Word2007 is clearly evident. To be blunt you are beginning to sound like a broken record. That's a cheap shot, Greg, and it's beside the point. I'm not a software designer. My criticisms of the Word 2007 monstrosity stand. I'm sure Greg can defend himself, but for the record I think he's spot on. If I had written the comment, I'd have said the same thing but would have omitted "are beginning to". Word 2007 is what it is, like it or not. I don't say everything about the Ribbon is better than everything about the old menus. But if you devote half as much energy to getting comfortable with the Ribbon as you have to kvetching about it, you may find that it's not as bad as you think, *and* you'll probably become an expert. -- Stan Brown, Oak Road Systems, Tompkins County, New York, USA http://OakRoadSystems.com/ |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
FYI Word 2007 users who must have menus
On Sun, 22 Apr 2007 16:20:44 -0400, "Greg Maxey"
wrote: Larry, I don't see anything cheap in the shot at all. Of course that is my opinion and it differs from yours. And from mine. My point remains that anyone that has been reading your posts recently is fully aware that you don't like Word2007. To continue the diatribe is well ... sounding like a broken record. Then ignore his posts. Again this is just my opinion. Your endless grousing about Word2007 here in this formum is not going to bring back the old UI. It's a "forum" (look it up), not a MS support group. There is supposed to be differences of opinion. I strongly differ with yours, for example, but I'm telling you to shut up. And your endless happy face is, at best, useless. You have other options. Designing your own software was just one of them. Idiotic statement. -- Running Word 2000 SP-3 on Windows 2000 |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
FYI Word 2007 users who must have menus
Larry,
I can't speak for anyone else, but I assure you that I am not attempting to scare or cow you or anyone else. I simply said that your views on Word2007 are already clear to everyone that reads this group and that you do have the freedom to take steps to find an alternative solution. I have certainly expressed some dissatisfaction with Word2007. If I could have, a few months ago I would have impaled the genious that killed AutoText Autocomplete tips. I am not enamored with the Ribbon either, but old menus and toolbars are gone and rather get stuck on it and have a daily hissy fit I have decided to accept it and move on. In doing so, I have found some things in Word2007 that I really like. I would trade AutoText Autocomplete tips for Content Controls any day. You can bark at the moon if you want to. Personally I don't think your redundant criticism here is going to change anything. If you want to keep it up I can ignore it. On Apr 23, 10:56 am, "Larry" wrote: There are a lot of people frequenting this group who want to say what I'm saying, but comments like the above make them afraid to say it. There's an orthodoxy shaping up here that is intended to cow anyone from criticizing Word 2007. I respect all the Word MVPs, but I will continue to criticize Word 2007 as I see fit. Suzanne says that Word 2003 is the alternative to 2007. But as everyone knows, as hardware and software continue to "progress," or at least to change, it gets harder to keep using old programs, and there is a continual pressure to adapt to the most recent programs. How long can people go on using 2003, before it is left behind by, say, further changes in Word's programming language, which will force them to use some "descendant" of Word 2007 that has Word 2007's interface? Speaking of grousing about Microsoft's latest generation of "innovations" which includes Word 2007 and Windows Vista, over at the Windows Vista group there is fierce outspoken protest against Vista coming from a lot of parties. However, I'm not recommending that this group become like that group, where there is a lot of nastiness. Larry "Stan Brown" wrote in message t... Sun, 22 Apr 2007 15:57:34 -0400 from Larry : "Greg Maxey" wrote in message ... Larry, I have read many of your posts and your disappointment with Word2007 is clearly evident. To be blunt you are beginning to sound like a broken record. That's a cheap shot, Greg, and it's beside the point. I'm not a software designer. My criticisms of the Word 2007 monstrosity stand. I'm sure Greg can defend himself, but for the record I think he's spot on. If I had written the comment, I'd have said the same thing but would have omitted "are beginning to". Word 2007 is what it is, like it or not. I don't say everything about the Ribbon is better than everything about the old menus. But if you devote half as much energy to getting comfortable with the Ribbon as you have to kvetching about it, you may find that it's not as bad as you think, *and* you'll probably become an expert. -- Stan Brown, Oak Road Systems, Tompkins County, New York, USA http://OakRoadSystems.com/- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
FYI Word 2007 users who must have menus
On Sun, 22 Apr 2007 17:50:15 -0500, "Beth Melton"
wrote: The "cheap shot", Larry, is spending a limited amount of time using Word 2007, forming quick and non-researched opinions, and then criticizing it every chance you get. I'm sure if I spent 5 to 10 minutes using "Larry's Word", and if I were one to form quick and non-researched opinions, I'd think it was hideous, a catastrophe, and a monstrosity - all because I haven't taken the time to use it. What you say takes months to learn really doesn't take that long at all. Now, I spent months learning about the new features (which is true of any new version), but I adapted to the UI fairly quickly. FWIW, I've been using the Office applications, with the menus/toolbars, since 1985, starting with Excel on a Mac. I went from using SuperCalc and WordStar with the slash commands and I couldn't imagine how using a mouse would help me work faster than my trusty keyboard navigation! But once I got the hang of using a mouse I never looked back. The UI you love was designed for 1989, just as the slash command nagivation was designed for early computer applications. A lot has changed since then and the programs outgrew the menu/toolbar system. I'm surprised they didn't do this long ago. I think the bottom line is, if you prefer to drive your 1950 Chevy with no air conditioning, manual steering, manual transmission, and drum brakes, then by all means, keep driving it. I prefer to drive my new convertible with air conditioning, automatic steering, split shift transmission (can switch to automatic or manual), anti-lock brakes, heated leather seats, GPS, and 4-disc CD changer. I like my car and I'm tired of someone merely kicking the tires and making assumptions about it. Another point completely missed. I never heard Larry tell you or Greg or anyone else not to use the new interface. He just said that he hates it and hates that HE is forced to use it or stay with an obsolete version. Your car analogy is off the mark. Your shiny new car is 100% compatible with existing roads, maps, gas stations, DMV procedures, etc. When you bought it, you didn't need more than 5 minutes of training to be able to drive away. When you upgraded, you didn't need to learn new maps, build new roads, go back to driver's school, take a new driver's test (unless you bought a bus), or anything. If your new car has a fancy GPS system, or a satellite uplink, or a wet bar, or a waterbed, it didn't affect your ability to drive down the road. And, both you and Larry can drive down the same road at the same time without either of you making any adjustments for each other. Larry has a valid point. MS tends to make changes because they can. I guarantee you, that Google Office is going to change that and I'm cheering for Google -- until they become the arrogant 8 million pound gorilla and start pushing people and customers around. It took about 60 years for TJ Watson's lean, mean, responsive company to become ossified and arrogant and get clipped my Microsoft. It's now been about 20 years. MS is getting bloated and slow. They weathered the Netscape scare just like IBM did early competitors by crushing them. So far the open source folks (and other grass roots efforts) have not quite got it together. But Google may just do to MS after 30 years what MS did to IBM after 60. In the meantime, Larry, keep complaining. Even if I don't agree with you. I'll just tune you out. ;-) -- Running Word 2000 SP-3 on Windows 2000 |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|