If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
outlook2003 doesn't retain password, using a blackberry too.
I have read thru all these posts here regarding password retension in
outlook 2003, recreated a profile, done the registry fix by adding permissions to the Protected Storage System Provider reference: http://support.microsoft.com/kb/290684/en-us However there was no: The user subkey folder resembles the following example: S-1-5-21-124525095-708259637-1543119021-16701 it was empty except for the (default) entry, no user identity, and I don't knwo how to create one. I have been stuck on this for 2 months now, scoured the net and then newsgroups, and nothing. any other help would be appreciated. also reference : http://support.microsoft.com/kb/829918/ this seemed to start when I loaded the blackberry software on the laptop, and then I uninstalled the softweare and still the same issue. OS is XP pro, and outlook 2003. Thanks. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
outlook2003 doesn't retain password, using a blackberry too.
Darkman [Gothic San Diego] wrote:
I have read thru all these posts here regarding password retension in outlook 2003, recreated a profile, done the registry fix by adding permissions to the Protected Storage System Provider reference: http://support.microsoft.com/kb/290684/en-us However there was no: The user subkey folder resembles the following example: S-1-5-21-124525095-708259637-1543119021-16701 it was empty except for the (default) entry, no user identity, and I don't knwo how to create one. If you have a functioning Windows system, this simply cannot be true for every SID on your system. There will be at least one SID that will not be empty. -- Brian Tillman [MVP-Outlook] |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
outlook2003 doesn't retain password, using a blackberry too.
"Brian Tillman" wrote in message ... Darkman [Gothic San Diego] wrote: I have read thru all these posts here regarding password retension in outlook 2003, recreated a profile, done the registry fix by adding permissions to the Protected Storage System Provider reference: http://support.microsoft.com/kb/290684/en-us However there was no: The user subkey folder resembles the following example: S-1-5-21-124525095-708259637-1543119021-16701 it was empty except for the (default) entry, no user identity, and I don't knwo how to create one. If you have a functioning Windows system, this simply cannot be true for every SID on your system. There will be at least one SID that will not be empty. -- Brian Tillman [MVP-Outlook] well it is here, there is no user info in this container. just the (default) entry. Currently I cannot access the machine but I will and upload a picture for you to see this anomally. undocumented feature? |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
outlook2003 doesn't retain password, using a blackberry too.
"Brian Tillman" wrote in message
... Darkman [Gothic San Diego] wrote: I have read thru all these posts here regarding password retension in outlook 2003, recreated a profile, done the registry fix by adding permissions to the Protected Storage System Provider reference: http://support.microsoft.com/kb/290684/en-us However there was no: The user subkey folder resembles the following example: S-1-5-21-124525095-708259637-1543119021-16701 it was empty except for the (default) entry, no user identity, and I don't knwo how to create one. If you have a functioning Windows system, this simply cannot be true for every SID on your system. There will be at least one SID that will not be empty. -- Brian Tillman [MVP-Outlook] Please see the link below for a screen shot of the registry to see what I am talking about, and what you say cannot be true, thank you. Larry http://www.darkmansdarkroom.com/newsgroup/registry.jpg |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
outlook2003 doesn't retain password, using a blackberry too.
Darkman [Gothic San Diego] wrote:
Please see the link below for a screen shot of the registry to see what I am talking about, and what you say cannot be true, thank you. Larry http://www.darkmansdarkroom.com/newsgroup/registry.jpg My fault for getting confused. I misunderstood what you were saying and thought you mean that there were no SIDs under HKEY_USERS. Stupid on my part, I know. -- Brian Tillman [MVP-Outlook] |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|