A Microsoft Office (Excel, Word) forum. OfficeFrustration

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » OfficeFrustration forum » Microsoft Outlook » Contacts
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read  

Contacts not within my groups when upgraded to 2003



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old December 14th, 2004, 11:13 AM
Tristán White
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Contacts not within my groups when upgraded to 2003

Hi there

We used to use POP3 mail from an NT server and the workstations were
using Outlook 2000 running on XP.

Now we have upgraded the server to 2003, and changed to an Exchange
2003 Server. We are also running Outlook 2003 on all the XP machines
(the 98 machines have to continue using 2000 for the time being).

The funny thing is, when we upgraded, and Outlook 2003 reimported the
contacts from the old PST, although the group names imported without
any problem, the contacts are NO LONGER WITHIN THE GROUP (although
they could be drag and dropped into the group).

Of our 28 users, about 7 users' groups imported perfectly. About 10
users' groups didn't import at all (the group name imports, but when
you try and send to a group it can't because it says that the group is
empty... sure enough, when you go to the group properties this is
confirmed).

The weird thing is, about five users have a mixture... some of their
groups imported fine, some of them imported empty!

As an IT professional I find such lack of logic to be quite hard to
deal with. Can anyone here shed any light?

It's become a PITA for the users as some of them have no recollection
of which users were in which groups (some of the groups were massive,
involving dozens of people).
  #2  
Old December 14th, 2004, 09:57 PM
Russ Valentine [MVP-Outlook]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I don't think there is any light to shed. Inexplicable though it may be,
I've posted many times in this group that DL's do not survive imports. Why
are you importing PST's anyway? Importing PST's loses a lot more data than
just DL's.
--
Russ Valentine
[MVP-Outlook]
"Tristán White" wrote in message
...
Hi there

We used to use POP3 mail from an NT server and the workstations were
using Outlook 2000 running on XP.

Now we have upgraded the server to 2003, and changed to an Exchange
2003 Server. We are also running Outlook 2003 on all the XP machines
(the 98 machines have to continue using 2000 for the time being).

The funny thing is, when we upgraded, and Outlook 2003 reimported the
contacts from the old PST, although the group names imported without
any problem, the contacts are NO LONGER WITHIN THE GROUP (although
they could be drag and dropped into the group).

Of our 28 users, about 7 users' groups imported perfectly. About 10
users' groups didn't import at all (the group name imports, but when
you try and send to a group it can't because it says that the group is
empty... sure enough, when you go to the group properties this is
confirmed).

The weird thing is, about five users have a mixture... some of their
groups imported fine, some of them imported empty!

As an IT professional I find such lack of logic to be quite hard to
deal with. Can anyone here shed any light?

It's become a PITA for the users as some of them have no recollection
of which users were in which groups (some of the groups were massive,
involving dozens of people).



  #3  
Old December 16th, 2004, 10:26 AM
Tristán White
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Tue, 14 Dec 2004 16:57:59 -0500, "Russ Valentine [MVP-Outlook]"
wrote:

I don't think there is any light to shed. Inexplicable though it may be,
I've posted many times in this group that DL's do not survive imports. Why
are you importing PST's anyway? Importing PST's loses a lot more data than
just DL's.



DL's? Downloads? Sorry, not sure what you mean here.
Thanks for the reply, though.
  #4  
Old December 16th, 2004, 10:50 AM
Russ Valentine [MVP-Outlook]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Distribution Lists.
I assume that's what you mean by "groups." Outlook does not use "groups."
--
Russ Valentine
[MVP-Outlook]
"Tristán White" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 14 Dec 2004 16:57:59 -0500, "Russ Valentine [MVP-Outlook]"
wrote:

I don't think there is any light to shed. Inexplicable though it may be,
I've posted many times in this group that DL's do not survive imports. Why
are you importing PST's anyway? Importing PST's loses a lot more data than
just DL's.



DL's? Downloads? Sorry, not sure what you mean here.
Thanks for the reply, though.



 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
In Outlook 2003 I cannot create new "contacts" folder - was this . Adam18 Contacts 1 November 10th, 2004 09:02 PM
Outlook 2003: Contacts Activities tab say "cannot display view this view" caused by corrupt .ost Michael B. Parker Contacts 1 October 10th, 2004 11:25 AM
Outlook 2003 email groups and contacts rechlin magma ca> Installation & Setup 0 July 27th, 2004 05:29 PM
Contacts missing after upgrading to Outlook 2003 KimMarie Contacts 0 July 12th, 2004 11:03 PM
Productkey problem when installing office 2003 on network Stefan Schreurs Setup, Installing & Configuration 1 June 1st, 2004 11:16 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:07 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 OfficeFrustration.
The comments are property of their posters.