If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Tips for justifying long document text - Word 2000
I am finishing a long book (230+ pages) and the client wants this justified.
I have turned on hyphenation (1.3cm zone - max of 2 per para), selected the option of using Wordperfect full justification, and allowed at least 14pt line spacing for an 11pt true type body font (Georgia). I am not kerning fonts as True Type fonts should, in theory, auto-adjust - and I have read that Word 2000's kerning feature is not that great. The effect looks very good except that, in places, the justification does not seem to work well. Are there any tips for improving problem areas of justification? The only ones I know are as follows:- a)For selective problem text increase of decrease the character spacing by 0.1pt b)Insert a non-breaking space or a 1/4 em space c)Use a line break at the end of a sentence which finishes at the end of a line. Does anyone have any suggestions, ideas or tools that can help with this task? Thanks in advance, Steven |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Hi Steven
NO SPAM PLEASE wrote: I am finishing a long book (230+ pages) and the client wants this justified. I have turned on hyphenation (1.3cm zone - max of 2 per para), selected the option of using Wordperfect full justification, and allowed at least 14pt line spacing for an 11pt true type body font (Georgia). To judge the quality of your choice, one would need to know how long lines are. As a rule of thumb, the longer the line, the more spacing you need. I am not kerning fonts as True Type fonts should, in theory, auto-adjust - and I have read that Word 2000's kerning feature is not that great. I have never heard of that "auto-adjust" (this might not mean much) you mention. However, I find you absolutely need to kern and I haven't found a good reason why this isn't set as per default in Word (I mean, Microsoft assumes everybody has a reasonable fast Internet access these days, so why not assume a decent computer where the speed it takes to do kerning is negligible indeed). The effect looks very good except that, in places, the justification does not seem to work well. That doesn't really explain: What is it that disturbs you? Are there any tips for improving problem areas of justification? The only ones I know are as follows:- a)For selective problem text increase of decrease the character spacing by 0.1pt b)Insert a non-breaking space or a 1/4 em space c)Use a line break at the end of a sentence which finishes at the end of a line. Your a) is one I've sometimes used, but really spearingly (plus: I've had some horrible results under certain circumstances (printer drivers) which made still less eager to use it. It certainly is something you do before the final printout only. I use non-breaking spaces (b)) sometimes to keep words together that must stay that way, or figures and their units. Often enough, the results look a bit odd (in justification) and I'd wish there was a non-breaking space which acts like a "non-breaker" only and not like a fixed-width space. Your c) is practically a no-no. Really horrible when you have to repaginate. Does anyone have any suggestions, ideas or tools that can help with this task? If you want really (or: nearly :-)) professional justified text, I think you need to do it manually. Or do it automatically (and without any fixed number of consecutive hyphenations) but still apply optional hyphens. HTH ..bob -- /"\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | MS \ / | MVP X Against HTML | for / \ in e-mail & news | Word |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Robert M. Franz wrote:
If you want really (or: nearly :-)) professional justified text, I think you need to do it manually. Or do it automatically (and without any fixed number of consecutive hyphenations) but still apply optional hyphens. HTH .bob Thanks for your reply bob. I am working on with an average line length of 62 char approximately. That is a page width of 140mm with 18mm margins left and right, based on an 11 point font size. Line spacing is 'at least 14pt', though I am going to try shifting this up to 'at least 15pt'. My complaint is that for a great many of the paragraphs word seems to do quite a good job. But on some paragraphs I see very poor, over-wide, wordspacing which looks plain naff. There seems no easy way to cure this unless Word looks at the paragraph as a whole. Quick question? With manual hyphenation Word appears to want to hyphenate wherever it feels appropriate on the line. My client does not like this effect and prefers hyphenation on the last word(s) of the line. I understand that I can say "no" to manual hyphenation suggestions - but is there a way to tighten the target zone? Thanks again, Steven |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
When you hyphenate automatically, Word will insert optional hyphens wherever
appropriate. These do not appear as hyphens unless the word is broken at the end of a line. Optional hyphens do not print and are visible only with nonprinting characters displayed. I personally never use automatic hyphenation. I prefer to hyphenate manually and conservatively. -- Suzanne S. Barnhill Microsoft MVP (Word) Words into Type Fairhope, Alabama USA Word MVP FAQ site: http://word.mvps.org Email cannot be acknowledged; please post all follow-ups to the newsgroup so all may benefit. "NO SPAM PLEASE" wrote in message ... Robert M. Franz wrote: If you want really (or: nearly :-)) professional justified text, I think you need to do it manually. Or do it automatically (and without any fixed number of consecutive hyphenations) but still apply optional hyphens. HTH .bob Thanks for your reply bob. I am working on with an average line length of 62 char approximately. That is a page width of 140mm with 18mm margins left and right, based on an 11 point font size. Line spacing is 'at least 14pt', though I am going to try shifting this up to 'at least 15pt'. My complaint is that for a great many of the paragraphs word seems to do quite a good job. But on some paragraphs I see very poor, over-wide, wordspacing which looks plain naff. There seems no easy way to cure this unless Word looks at the paragraph as a whole. Quick question? With manual hyphenation Word appears to want to hyphenate wherever it feels appropriate on the line. My client does not like this effect and prefers hyphenation on the last word(s) of the line. I understand that I can say "no" to manual hyphenation suggestions - but is there a way to tighten the target zone? Thanks again, Steven |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Hi Steven
NO SPAM PLEASE wrote: I am working on with an average line length of 62 char approximately. That is a page width of 140mm with 18mm margins left and right, based on an 11 point font size. Line spacing is 'at least 14pt', though I am going to try shifting this up to 'at least 15pt'. 11 on 15 is a lot, but when I look at a page with 11cm long paragraphs and in Georgia, I'd prefer that over 11 on 14. My complaint is that for a great many of the paragraphs word seems to do quite a good job. But on some paragraphs I see very poor, over-wide, wordspacing which looks plain naff. There seems no easy way to cure this unless Word looks at the paragraph as a whole. Which it doesn't. It really only takes line for line (and stops inserting a hyphen only when you set a max. number of hyphenations in a row). This means you have to overrule it now and then, and that's where the optional hyphens come into play: "Insert | Symbol | Special: Optional hyphen" will tell you what shortcut is assigned to it on your system. You have to look at the whole paragraph and decide whether you need to insert such a hyphen before or after the line where you are not satisfied with the result. Greetings ..bob -- /"\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | MS \ / | MVP X Against HTML | for / \ in e-mail & news | Word |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Robert M. Franz wrote:
Hi Steven NO SPAM PLEASE wrote: I am working on with an average line length of 62 char approximately. That is a page width of 140mm with 18mm margins left and right, based on an 11 point font size. Line spacing is 'at least 14pt', though I am going to try shifting this up to 'at least 15pt'. 11 on 15 is a lot, but when I look at a page with 11cm long paragraphs and in Georgia, I'd prefer that over 11 on 14. My complaint is that for a great many of the paragraphs word seems to do quite a good job. But on some paragraphs I see very poor, over-wide, wordspacing which looks plain naff. There seems no easy way to cure this unless Word looks at the paragraph as a whole. Which it doesn't. It really only takes line for line (and stops inserting a hyphen only when you set a max. number of hyphenations in a row). This means you have to overrule it now and then, and that's where the optional hyphens come into play: "Insert | Symbol | Special: Optional hyphen" will tell you what shortcut is assigned to it on your system. You have to look at the whole paragraph and decide whether you need to insert such a hyphen before or after the line where you are not satisfied with the result. Greetings .bob Thanks - that has clarified a lot for me. I will give this a go and come back if there are any further issues! Regards, Steven |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
macro in word | js | General Discussion | 1 | December 28th, 2004 03:01 AM |
Troubleshoot the SendObject method | Nikky_Pickles | General Discussion | 1 | August 30th, 2004 07:40 AM |
Rich Text Spell Check | Stephen Lebans | General Discussion | 0 | July 27th, 2004 01:03 AM |
Bookmarks are not retained during Mail Merge | Latha | Mailmerge | 22 | June 16th, 2004 08:53 PM |
word error | mac | General Discussions | 1 | May 6th, 2004 08:14 AM |