A Microsoft Office (Excel, Word) forum. OfficeFrustration

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » OfficeFrustration forum » Microsoft Word » Tables
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read  

Approach to document design



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old January 5th, 2006, 02:25 PM posted to microsoft.public.word.tables
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Approach to document design

I am working on a family genealogy project in which I have 300+ old family
photographs that have been scanned and that I plan to organize into a single
document that will ultimately be published and hardbound. Each photo will be
accompanied by narrative information of varying lengths.

1) My planned approach is to insert a table on each page and adjust the
columns and rows of the table for the page layout desired. Insert the image
or images for that page into the appropriate table cells. Then add the
narratives into adjacent cells. Is this approach sound? Is there really a
better way?

2) My source images are rather large TIF’s (ranging from 20 to 90 mb each)
but I plan to use a copy of them converted to JPG for the MS-Word document to
conserve some memory. I am estimating this will be a 200 page document
consisting mostly of JPG’s. Will I run into any memory issues when dealing
with a document this big and with this many graphics and tables?

Any guidance or assistance is appreciated and welcomed. Thanks much in
advance for your assistance.

  #2  
Old January 5th, 2006, 04:41 PM posted to microsoft.public.word.tables
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Approach to document design

You don't say whether you're planning to produce this document in-house
(printing it yourself) or send it to a commercial printer. Some of the
decisions will depend partly on that factor.

1. I would encourage use of a table as opposed to text boxes or frames.
Keeping graphics In Line With Text (as they will be in a table) is always
simpler and easier to handle.

2. If you're keeping the document in-house, I would strongly encourage
linking to the photos instead of embedding them (and if you do this, there's
no reason not to stick with the original TIFFs). This will cut down on the
total document size. You can still do this when sending the document out,
but you'll have to send all the photo files with it (if you keep the photos
in the same folder with the document, links will be relative, so they'll
still work when you copy the files to a CD).

When possible, turn on picture placeholders (Tools | Options | View) to
improve performance when dealing with the text. It's also a good idea to
split the table from time to time, as Word has trouble dealing with long
tables (but can handle multiple tables well); see
http://word.mvps.org/FAQs/TblsFldsFms/FastTables.htm

Others will probably have more (and possibly better) advice.

--
Suzanne S. Barnhill
Microsoft MVP (Word)
Words into Type
Fairhope, Alabama USA
Word MVP FAQ site: http://word.mvps.org
Email cannot be acknowledged; please post all follow-ups to the newsgroup so
all may benefit.

"XP" wrote in message
...
I am working on a family genealogy project in which I have 300+ old family
photographs that have been scanned and that I plan to organize into a

single
document that will ultimately be published and hardbound. Each photo will

be
accompanied by narrative information of varying lengths.

1) My planned approach is to insert a table on each page and adjust the
columns and rows of the table for the page layout desired. Insert the imag

e
or images for that page into the appropriate table cells. Then add the
narratives into adjacent cells. Is this approach sound? Is there really a
better way?

2) My source images are rather large TIF’s (ranging from 20 to 90 mb each)
but I plan to use a copy of them converted to JPG for the MS-Word document

to
conserve some memory. I am estimating this will be a 200 page document
consisting mostly of JPG’s. Will I run into any memory issues when dealing
with a document this big and with this many graphics and tables?

Any guidance or assistance is appreciated and welcomed. Thanks much in
advance for your assistance.


  #3  
Old January 5th, 2006, 05:35 PM posted to microsoft.public.word.tables
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Approach to document design

Thank you for your input Suzanne.

I plan to have a commercial printer print and bind the book.
I like the image linking idea, however, there is no way a CD will hold all
that data. Thanks for the info about the tables, we are on the same page g
there.

On reflection, I may create each MS-Word page as a separate saved document,
then convert these to individual PDF's, then combine all into a single PDF.
To be honest I think that approach would provide the most stability. This
would also make editing fast and easy.

Thanks again Suzanne, feel to post again if more thoughts occur to you.

"Suzanne S. Barnhill" wrote:

You don't say whether you're planning to produce this document in-house
(printing it yourself) or send it to a commercial printer. Some of the
decisions will depend partly on that factor.

1. I would encourage use of a table as opposed to text boxes or frames.
Keeping graphics In Line With Text (as they will be in a table) is always
simpler and easier to handle.

2. If you're keeping the document in-house, I would strongly encourage
linking to the photos instead of embedding them (and if you do this, there's
no reason not to stick with the original TIFFs). This will cut down on the
total document size. You can still do this when sending the document out,
but you'll have to send all the photo files with it (if you keep the photos
in the same folder with the document, links will be relative, so they'll
still work when you copy the files to a CD).

When possible, turn on picture placeholders (Tools | Options | View) to
improve performance when dealing with the text. It's also a good idea to
split the table from time to time, as Word has trouble dealing with long
tables (but can handle multiple tables well); see
http://word.mvps.org/FAQs/TblsFldsFms/FastTables.htm

Others will probably have more (and possibly better) advice.

--
Suzanne S. Barnhill
Microsoft MVP (Word)
Words into Type
Fairhope, Alabama USA
Word MVP FAQ site: http://word.mvps.org
Email cannot be acknowledged; please post all follow-ups to the newsgroup so
all may benefit.

"XP" wrote in message
...
I am working on a family genealogy project in which I have 300+ old family
photographs that have been scanned and that I plan to organize into a

single
document that will ultimately be published and hardbound. Each photo will

be
accompanied by narrative information of varying lengths.

1) My planned approach is to insert a table on each page and adjust the
columns and rows of the table for the page layout desired. Insert the imag

e
or images for that page into the appropriate table cells. Then add the
narratives into adjacent cells. Is this approach sound? Is there really a
better way?

2) My source images are rather large TIF’s (ranging from 20 to 90 mb each)
but I plan to use a copy of them converted to JPG for the MS-Word document

to
conserve some memory. I am estimating this will be a 200 page document
consisting mostly of JPG’s. Will I run into any memory issues when dealing
with a document this big and with this many graphics and tables?

Any guidance or assistance is appreciated and welcomed. Thanks much in
advance for your assistance.



  #4  
Old January 5th, 2006, 07:17 PM posted to microsoft.public.word.tables
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Approach to document design

Sending the page to the commercial printer as a PDF is a good idea if you
have this capability. Given the structure of your document, creating it page
by page is not too unreasonable, though I would suggest perhaps a somewhat
larger division (maybe "bundles" of ten or a dozen pages). Also, keep in
mind that if you want running heads, page numbers, a TOC, etc., there are
advantages to keeping everything in one document.

--
Suzanne S. Barnhill
Microsoft MVP (Word)
Words into Type
Fairhope, Alabama USA
Word MVP FAQ site: http://word.mvps.org
Email cannot be acknowledged; please post all follow-ups to the newsgroup so
all may benefit.

"XP" wrote in message
news
Thank you for your input Suzanne.

I plan to have a commercial printer print and bind the book.
I like the image linking idea, however, there is no way a CD will hold all
that data. Thanks for the info about the tables, we are on the same page
g
there.

On reflection, I may create each MS-Word page as a separate saved

document,
then convert these to individual PDF's, then combine all into a single

PDF.
To be honest I think that approach would provide the most stability. This
would also make editing fast and easy.

Thanks again Suzanne, feel to post again if more thoughts occur to you.

"Suzanne S. Barnhill" wrote:

You don't say whether you're planning to produce this document in-house
(printing it yourself) or send it to a commercial printer. Some of the
decisions will depend partly on that factor.

1. I would encourage use of a table as opposed to text boxes or frames.
Keeping graphics In Line With Text (as they will be in a table) is

always
simpler and easier to handle.

2. If you're keeping the document in-house, I would strongly encourage
linking to the photos instead of embedding them (and if you do this,

there's
no reason not to stick with the original TIFFs). This will cut down on

the
total document size. You can still do this when sending the document

out,
but you'll have to send all the photo files with it (if you keep the

photos
in the same folder with the document, links will be relative, so they'll
still work when you copy the files to a CD).

When possible, turn on picture placeholders (Tools | Options | View) to
improve performance when dealing with the text. It's also a good idea to
split the table from time to time, as Word has trouble dealing with long
tables (but can handle multiple tables well); see
http://word.mvps.org/FAQs/TblsFldsFms/FastTables.htm

Others will probably have more (and possibly better) advice.

--
Suzanne S. Barnhill
Microsoft MVP (Word)
Words into Type
Fairhope, Alabama USA
Word MVP FAQ site: http://word.mvps.org
Email cannot be acknowledged; please post all follow-ups to the

newsgroup so
all may benefit.

"XP" wrote in message
...
I am working on a family genealogy project in which I have 300+ old

family
photographs that have been scanned and that I plan to organize into a

single
document that will ultimately be published and hardbound. Each photo

will
be
accompanied by narrative information of varying lengths.

1) My planned approach is to insert a table on each page and adjust

the
columns and rows of the table for the page layout desired. Insert the

imag
e
or images for that page into the appropriate table cells. Then add the
narratives into adjacent cells. Is this approach sound? Is there

really a
better way?

2) My source images are rather large TIF’s (ranging from 20 to 90 mb

each)
but I plan to use a copy of them converted to JPG for the MS-Word

document
to
conserve some memory. I am estimating this will be a 200 page document
consisting mostly of JPG’s. Will I run into any memory issues when

dealing
with a document this big and with this many graphics and tables?

Any guidance or assistance is appreciated and welcomed. Thanks much in
advance for your assistance.




  #5  
Old January 5th, 2006, 08:00 PM posted to microsoft.public.word.tables
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Approach to document design

All very good points for me to consider.
Thanks again very much for your input.

"Suzanne S. Barnhill" wrote:

Sending the page to the commercial printer as a PDF is a good idea if you
have this capability. Given the structure of your document, creating it page
by page is not too unreasonable, though I would suggest perhaps a somewhat
larger division (maybe "bundles" of ten or a dozen pages). Also, keep in
mind that if you want running heads, page numbers, a TOC, etc., there are
advantages to keeping everything in one document.

--
Suzanne S. Barnhill
Microsoft MVP (Word)
Words into Type
Fairhope, Alabama USA
Word MVP FAQ site: http://word.mvps.org
Email cannot be acknowledged; please post all follow-ups to the newsgroup so
all may benefit.

"XP" wrote in message
news
Thank you for your input Suzanne.

I plan to have a commercial printer print and bind the book.
I like the image linking idea, however, there is no way a CD will hold all
that data. Thanks for the info about the tables, we are on the same page

g
there.

On reflection, I may create each MS-Word page as a separate saved

document,
then convert these to individual PDF's, then combine all into a single

PDF.
To be honest I think that approach would provide the most stability. This
would also make editing fast and easy.

Thanks again Suzanne, feel to post again if more thoughts occur to you.

"Suzanne S. Barnhill" wrote:

You don't say whether you're planning to produce this document in-house
(printing it yourself) or send it to a commercial printer. Some of the
decisions will depend partly on that factor.

1. I would encourage use of a table as opposed to text boxes or frames.
Keeping graphics In Line With Text (as they will be in a table) is

always
simpler and easier to handle.

2. If you're keeping the document in-house, I would strongly encourage
linking to the photos instead of embedding them (and if you do this,

there's
no reason not to stick with the original TIFFs). This will cut down on

the
total document size. You can still do this when sending the document

out,
but you'll have to send all the photo files with it (if you keep the

photos
in the same folder with the document, links will be relative, so they'll
still work when you copy the files to a CD).

When possible, turn on picture placeholders (Tools | Options | View) to
improve performance when dealing with the text. It's also a good idea to
split the table from time to time, as Word has trouble dealing with long
tables (but can handle multiple tables well); see
http://word.mvps.org/FAQs/TblsFldsFms/FastTables.htm

Others will probably have more (and possibly better) advice.

--
Suzanne S. Barnhill
Microsoft MVP (Word)
Words into Type
Fairhope, Alabama USA
Word MVP FAQ site: http://word.mvps.org
Email cannot be acknowledged; please post all follow-ups to the

newsgroup so
all may benefit.

"XP" wrote in message
...
I am working on a family genealogy project in which I have 300+ old

family
photographs that have been scanned and that I plan to organize into a
single
document that will ultimately be published and hardbound. Each photo

will
be
accompanied by narrative information of varying lengths.

1) My planned approach is to insert a table on each page and adjust

the
columns and rows of the table for the page layout desired. Insert the

imag
e
or images for that page into the appropriate table cells. Then add the
narratives into adjacent cells. Is this approach sound? Is there

really a
better way?

2) My source images are rather large TIF’s (ranging from 20 to 90 mb

each)
but I plan to use a copy of them converted to JPG for the MS-Word

document
to
conserve some memory. I am estimating this will be a 200 page document
consisting mostly of JPG’s. Will I run into any memory issues when

dealing
with a document this big and with this many graphics and tables?

Any guidance or assistance is appreciated and welcomed. Thanks much in
advance for your assistance.





 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Word 2003 [email protected] General Discussion 20 April 19th, 2006 06:35 PM
macros and SharePoint WSS document libraries [email protected] New Users 0 October 6th, 2005 03:42 AM
design document with built in styles for training design KIT General Discussion 0 June 30th, 2005 01:10 PM
Document Starts in Design Mode every time I open it Colin Higbie General Discussion 4 June 14th, 2004 12:24 PM
opening a document so it is NOT in design mode Brad Pears New Users 1 May 3rd, 2004 09:13 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:55 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 OfficeFrustration.
The comments are property of their posters.