A Microsoft Office (Excel, Word) forum. OfficeFrustration

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » OfficeFrustration forum » Microsoft Word » New Users
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read  

Word 2007 is "More intuitive??"



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old June 14th, 2008, 03:36 PM posted to microsoft.public.word.newusers
PA
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 187
Default Word 2007 is "More intuitive??" (Security settings)

This is a fascinating discussion.
To expand the the topic a bit, I now find that I am a bit confused by the
macro security settings. Could someone enlighten me, please.

"PA" wrote:

I hope it just that this new interface is still strange to me, but I am
finding the migration from Office 2007 to be far more difficult than was any
previous change.
I have used Office since version 97 (in 1998) and have migrated to new
releases as the minds in Washington state decided it was time for me to
change. Those were all painless.
Any and all opinion are welcomed to help enlighten me.

And by the way, Ron deBruin, an Excel MVP has an excellent site at
http://www.rondebruin.nl/0307commands.html. It is related to Excel, but may
prove valuable for Word and PowerPoint as well.

  #32  
Old June 14th, 2008, 03:54 PM posted to microsoft.public.word.newusers
Suzanne S. Barnhill
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 31,786
Default Word 2007 is "More intuitive??"

Okay, I had to use Safe Mode for something else, so I did this. Even with
the toolbars on a single row, I still have the Print Preview button.

--
Suzanne S. Barnhill
Microsoft MVP (Word)
Words into Type
Fairhope, Alabama USA

"Bob Buckland ?:-)" 75214.226(At Beautiful Downtown)compuserve.com wrote
in message ...
Hi Suzanne,

===========
"Suzanne S. Barnhill" wrote in message
...
[snip]
I agree that making Print Preview so hard to get to was a step
backward.[snip]
========

Ahhh, how quickly we forget.

Word 2003 out of the box (hold ctrl key to access 'wayback' machine g)

File=expand[menus]=Print Preview

Word 2007 out of the box
Office Button=Print=Print Preview

(i.e. the default was 3 clicks, or 2 clicks and one hover in each g)

Steps to add Print Preview to toolbar in Word 2003
Tools=Customize= then with that dialog open
File=expand=drag print preview, close Customize dialog

Steps to add Print Preview to Quick Access Toolbar in Word 2007
Office Button=Print
then right click Print Preview, choose 'Add to Quick Access Toolbar'

[Imagine how much 'fun' it is to have that 'Expand' menu as the 'locked
down' default every day on every Office 2003 app at work
g]


--

Bob Buckland ?:-)
MS Office System Products MVP

*Courtesy is not expensive and can pay big dividends*





  #33  
Old June 14th, 2008, 08:21 PM posted to microsoft.public.word.newusers
Marsh
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 108
Default Word 2007 is "More intuitive??" (Security settings)

A very thourough explanation is found at

http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/l...chNet.10).aspx

"PA" wrote:

This is a fascinating discussion.
To expand the the topic a bit, I now find that I am a bit confused by the
macro security settings. Could someone enlighten me, please.

"PA" wrote:

I hope it just that this new interface is still strange to me, but I am
finding the migration from Office 2007 to be far more difficult than was any
previous change.
I have used Office since version 97 (in 1998) and have migrated to new
releases as the minds in Washington state decided it was time for me to
change. Those were all painless.
Any and all opinion are welcomed to help enlighten me.

And by the way, Ron deBruin, an Excel MVP has an excellent site at
http://www.rondebruin.nl/0307commands.html. It is related to Excel, but may
prove valuable for Word and PowerPoint as well.

  #34  
Old July 3rd, 2008, 02:32 PM posted to microsoft.public.word.newusers
Bob Buckland ?:-\)
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 5,766
Default Word 2007 is "More intuitive??"

Hi Taz,

Actually I got myself on that one

What I had forgotten was the effect of not having used

Tools=Customize=Options=[Reset Menu and Toolbar Usage Data]

In a locked down Office deployment (i.e. where things reset after every session for the next login), if the 'everyone the same'
cloning occured (as it did in the common profile at work) with usage data from testing still stored, not reset, then the 'default'
positions of the buttons (including Print Preview) are different for that 'startup' experience than the original 'out of the box'
ones.

As this one covers a whole lot of users g the help desk position has been that to change it would cause more confusion and
since the CIO received compensation in the 7-figure range last year, it's a bit tough to get things changed that are set in.

=============
"CyberTaz" wrote in message .. .
Yeah, you got him there, Suzanne:-)

In every version of Word I can recall [going back to Word 1.0 on the Mac]
there has been a Print Preview button on the Standard toolbar as an
out-of-the-box feature - right next to the Print button. It never had to be
added to a toolbar as an optional customization prior to Word 2007 - unless
you wanted it elsewhere as well or instead of the default location.

If developments on the Mac are any indication of coming trends in Windows -
not that such a thing would ever happen or has ever happened in the past:-)
- print services are being overtly assumed by the OS & printer software. MS
may be weaning their apps away from Print Preview altogether - in Office:Mac
2008 it's already been removed completely from Excel & PowerPoint.

Regards |:)
Bob Jones
[MVP] Office:Mac


  #35  
Old July 3rd, 2008, 02:52 PM posted to microsoft.public.word.newusers
Bob Buckland ?:-\)
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 5,766
Default Word 2007 is "More intuitive??"

Hi Marsoupeal,

It's interesting to see some of the comments on the Ribbon change. I recall when Windows came out, similar discussions and
complaints about how almost everything worked, including the layout of the menu bar and what items were listed under those. It
wasn't an overnight success for folks finding that interface 'intuitive' either.

Even when the switch came from things like CP/M to MS-DOS there were complaints that Microsoft 'dared' to change some of the command
line tools so that instead of CP/M's convention for changing a name of a file using
REN NewName = Oldname

to Microsoft using

REN OldName Newname

or Microsoft changing the CP/M PIP [multifunction] command name to COPY. Folks (far fewer 'end users' g in those days ) said they
were sure it would cause no end of confusion and trouble and would of course, fail in the end g. Today, any change can impact so
many users and their daily routines that it's a bit more daring to make a switch than it was in ye olden dayes, although some folks
don't notice that throughout their day that they are switching through differing keyboard and screen layouts with a variety of
devices all day long with little thought to the switch in the keyboard and displays (computer, cell phone, MP3 player, TV/DVR
remote, office copier, digital dashboards in cars)

There was another 'debate' with 'strong positions' over the number of buttons on a mouse for Apple vs Microsoft, and who was right,
and so on .

Of course now we've all learned from folks doing txting on cell phones that you can actually master an interface while being 'all
thumbs'.

==========
Marsoupeal wrote in message ...


But some features, like word's built in calulator, are harder to
"discover" now. In some ways, the trouble is MS stayed with the toolbars
too long, till they became set in stone in many users' and especially
business users' minds.

Incidentally the ribbon system is not totally new to software. I
remember seeing it as long ago as 2000 in the web editor 1stpage 2000,
(nothing to do with Microsoft or Frontpage 2000 as far as I know.) But I
think Microsoft's business users are more conservative than the average
computer user.
--

Bob Buckland ?:-)
MS Office System Products MVP

*Courtesy is not expensive and can pay big dividends*


  #36  
Old August 21st, 2008, 02:57 AM posted to microsoft.public.word.newusers
starcat
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2
Default Word 2007 is "More intuitive??"


"Suzanne S. Barnhill" wrote in message
...
The experience seems to be that the new UI is more intuitive for brand-new
users and not too difficult for casual users to get used to. Longtime
power users, the ones who knew where every command was on every menu and
where every button was in every dialog or on every toolbar (and had their
toolbars and menus extensively customized), are the ones who are really
suffering.

--
Suzanne S. Barnhill
Microsoft MVP (Word)
Words into Type
Fairhope, Alabama USA



We're not just suffering - we're giving up. I have tried, I really have, to
adjust to the new interface, but I've come to loathe it so much I've gone
back to Word 2003. If Microsoft doesn't improve this in their next version,
then when 2003 is not working for me any longer, I will have to seriously
look elsewhere for my word processing needs. I never thought I would ever
give up on any version of Word, but I'm giving up now. (I've been a power
user since Word 3.0, so it's a painful epiphany that Word isn't the right
program for me any more.)


  #37  
Old August 21st, 2008, 04:19 AM posted to microsoft.public.word.newusers
Suzanne S. Barnhill
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 31,786
Default Word 2007 is "More intuitive??"

I installed Word 2007 side-by-side with Word 2003, knowing that I would
probably use 2007 only for reference in answering users' simpler questions.
I still use Word 2003 for production work and probably will continue to do
so for some time. I've done a few things in 2007 (my blog, letters to my
kids using Word 2003 templates), but I would have to have a lot more time to
play around with it to get comfortable enough to want to use it full time. I
despair of ever knowing how numbering works, though I must get that figured
out in order to update some of my Web articles. So far I haven't gotten a
round enough tuit for that. g

--
Suzanne S. Barnhill
Microsoft MVP (Word)
Words into Type
Fairhope, Alabama USA

"starcat" wrote in message
...

"Suzanne S. Barnhill" wrote in message
...
The experience seems to be that the new UI is more intuitive for
brand-new users and not too difficult for casual users to get used to.
Longtime power users, the ones who knew where every command was on every
menu and where every button was in every dialog or on every toolbar (and
had their toolbars and menus extensively customized), are the ones who
are really suffering.

--
Suzanne S. Barnhill
Microsoft MVP (Word)
Words into Type
Fairhope, Alabama USA



We're not just suffering - we're giving up. I have tried, I really have,
to adjust to the new interface, but I've come to loathe it so much I've
gone back to Word 2003. If Microsoft doesn't improve this in their next
version, then when 2003 is not working for me any longer, I will have to
seriously look elsewhere for my word processing needs. I never thought I
would ever give up on any version of Word, but I'm giving up now. (I've
been a power user since Word 3.0, so it's a painful epiphany that Word
isn't the right program for me any more.)




  #38  
Old August 21st, 2008, 07:44 AM posted to microsoft.public.word.newusers
Graham Mayor
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 18,297
Default Word 2007 is "More intuitive??"

Much the same here. About the only things I use Word 2007 for are writing
letters (because I converted one of my templates to 2007 early on) and for
vba programming, because the vba help is better. I still use Word 2003 for
anything complicated, because it is second nature to do so.

I said early on that Microsoft had not considered the huge training
implications of such a radical change. I still think that the good parts of
this application are far outweighed by the inconvenience of the changes to
the interface.

I have however updated my web articles

--

Graham Mayor - Word MVP

My web site www.gmayor.com
Word MVP web site http://word.mvps.org



Suzanne S. Barnhill wrote:
I installed Word 2007 side-by-side with Word 2003, knowing that I
would probably use 2007 only for reference in answering users'
simpler questions. I still use Word 2003 for production work and
probably will continue to do so for some time. I've done a few things
in 2007 (my blog, letters to my kids using Word 2003 templates), but
I would have to have a lot more time to play around with it to get
comfortable enough to want to use it full time. I despair of ever
knowing how numbering works, though I must get that figured out in
order to update some of my Web articles. So far I haven't gotten a
round enough tuit for that. g

"starcat" wrote in message
...

"Suzanne S. Barnhill" wrote in message
...
The experience seems to be that the new UI is more intuitive for
brand-new users and not too difficult for casual users to get used
to. Longtime power users, the ones who knew where every command was
on every menu and where every button was in every dialog or on
every toolbar (and had their toolbars and menus extensively
customized), are the ones who are really suffering.

--
Suzanne S. Barnhill
Microsoft MVP (Word)
Words into Type
Fairhope, Alabama USA



We're not just suffering - we're giving up. I have tried, I really
have, to adjust to the new interface, but I've come to loathe it so
much I've gone back to Word 2003. If Microsoft doesn't improve this
in their next version, then when 2003 is not working for me any
longer, I will have to seriously look elsewhere for my word
processing needs. I never thought I would ever give up on any
version of Word, but I'm giving up now. (I've been a power user
since Word 3.0, so it's a painful epiphany that Word isn't the right
program for me any more.)



  #39  
Old August 21st, 2008, 10:40 AM posted to microsoft.public.word.newusers
Terry Farrell
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,004
Default Word 2007 is "More intuitive??"

I am about to purchase a new Notebook: guess what I'll be installing...

--
Terry Farrell - MSWord MVP

"starcat" wrote in message
...

"Suzanne S. Barnhill" wrote in message
...
The experience seems to be that the new UI is more intuitive for
brand-new users and not too difficult for casual users to get used to.
Longtime power users, the ones who knew where every command was on every
menu and where every button was in every dialog or on every toolbar (and
had their toolbars and menus extensively customized), are the ones who
are really suffering.

--
Suzanne S. Barnhill
Microsoft MVP (Word)
Words into Type
Fairhope, Alabama USA



We're not just suffering - we're giving up. I have tried, I really have,
to adjust to the new interface, but I've come to loathe it so much I've
gone back to Word 2003. If Microsoft doesn't improve this in their next
version, then when 2003 is not working for me any longer, I will have to
seriously look elsewhere for my word processing needs. I never thought I
would ever give up on any version of Word, but I'm giving up now. (I've
been a power user since Word 3.0, so it's a painful epiphany that Word
isn't the right program for me any more.)


  #40  
Old August 21st, 2008, 02:12 PM posted to microsoft.public.word.newusers
Suzanne S. Barnhill
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 31,786
Default Word 2007 is "More intuitive??"

Hard to say. You seem to have come to terms with 2007, but from the tenor of
this thread, should I guess 2003?

--
Suzanne S. Barnhill
Microsoft MVP (Word)
Words into Type
Fairhope, Alabama USA

"Terry Farrell" wrote in message
...
I am about to purchase a new Notebook: guess what I'll be installing...

--
Terry Farrell - MSWord MVP

"starcat" wrote in message
...

"Suzanne S. Barnhill" wrote in message
...
The experience seems to be that the new UI is more intuitive for
brand-new users and not too difficult for casual users to get used to.
Longtime power users, the ones who knew where every command was on every
menu and where every button was in every dialog or on every toolbar (and
had their toolbars and menus extensively customized), are the ones who
are really suffering.

--
Suzanne S. Barnhill
Microsoft MVP (Word)
Words into Type
Fairhope, Alabama USA



We're not just suffering - we're giving up. I have tried, I really have,
to adjust to the new interface, but I've come to loathe it so much I've
gone back to Word 2003. If Microsoft doesn't improve this in their next
version, then when 2003 is not working for me any longer, I will have to
seriously look elsewhere for my word processing needs. I never thought I
would ever give up on any version of Word, but I'm giving up now. (I've
been a power user since Word 3.0, so it's a painful epiphany that Word
isn't the right program for me any more.)





 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:16 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 OfficeFrustration.
The comments are property of their posters.