If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
what is the downside using Word's internal versioning feature?
aside from bloating the file, what is the downside of using Word's internal
versioning feature? and why would you use it? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
what is the downside using Word's internal versioning feature?
On Mon, 5 Mar 2007 13:54:47 -0800, marilyn315
wrote: aside from bloating the file, what is the downside of using Word's internal versioning feature? and why would you use it? Its use has been one of the circumstances implicated in document corruption. Others include the Fast Saves feature and the practice of opening documents from removable media. (http://www.word.mvps.org/FAQs/AppErrors/CorruptDoc.htm) The Versions feature has been removed from Word 2007. The replacement is the use of SharePoint Services, or just keeping different versions in different files. In short, I wouldn't use it. -- Regards, Jay Freedman Microsoft Word MVP FAQ: http://word.mvps.org Email cannot be acknowledged; please post all follow-ups to the newsgroup so all may benefit. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
what is the downside using Word's internal versioning feature?
Well, I really liked this feature. As a poet, I might have 45
progressive/experimental versions of an 8-line poem, and I might have 5 of those versions out to 10 different poetry journals. Sometimes the differences are as small as an added comma. I never stop tinkering. Each journal can take 6-18 months to respond, so it's very likely that I'll have messed around with that poem before I hear back. If they accept it, they want the version they saw, not my revisions. So it's very useful to be able to call up the version I sent. And very, very messy to have 45 versions saved to my hard disk, one for each magazine sent to. And also to have a subfolder for each of my 95 (and counting) 1-10 page poems. Ditto my short stories and essays. I don't think SharePoint is a practical solution for this, because no matter where I put them, I just don't want a billion separate files. "Jay Freedman" wrote: On Mon, 5 Mar 2007 13:54:47 -0800, marilyn315 wrote: aside from bloating the file, what is the downside of using Word's internal versioning feature? and why would you use it? Its use has been one of the circumstances implicated in document corruption. Others include the Fast Saves feature and the practice of opening documents from removable media. (http://www.word.mvps.org/FAQs/AppErrors/CorruptDoc.htm) The Versions feature has been removed from Word 2007. The replacement is the use of SharePoint Services, or just keeping different versions in different files. In short, I wouldn't use it. -- Regards, Jay Freedman Microsoft Word MVP FAQ: http://word.mvps.org Email cannot be acknowledged; please post all follow-ups to the newsgroup so all may benefit. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
what is the downside using Word's internal versioning feature?
Hi Lioncaller,
You could, of course, save the document with a different filename for each version -- Cheers macropod [Microsoft MVP - Word] "Lioncaller" wrote in message ... Well, I really liked this feature. As a poet, I might have 45 progressive/experimental versions of an 8-line poem, and I might have 5 of those versions out to 10 different poetry journals. Sometimes the differences are as small as an added comma. I never stop tinkering. Each journal can take 6-18 months to respond, so it's very likely that I'll have messed around with that poem before I hear back. If they accept it, they want the version they saw, not my revisions. So it's very useful to be able to call up the version I sent. And very, very messy to have 45 versions saved to my hard disk, one for each magazine sent to. And also to have a subfolder for each of my 95 (and counting) 1-10 page poems. Ditto my short stories and essays. I don't think SharePoint is a practical solution for this, because no matter where I put them, I just don't want a billion separate files. "Jay Freedman" wrote: On Mon, 5 Mar 2007 13:54:47 -0800, marilyn315 wrote: aside from bloating the file, what is the downside of using Word's internal versioning feature? and why would you use it? Its use has been one of the circumstances implicated in document corruption. Others include the Fast Saves feature and the practice of opening documents from removable media. (http://www.word.mvps.org/FAQs/AppErrors/CorruptDoc.htm) The Versions feature has been removed from Word 2007. The replacement is the use of SharePoint Services, or just keeping different versions in different files. In short, I wouldn't use it. -- Regards, Jay Freedman Microsoft Word MVP FAQ: http://word.mvps.org Email cannot be acknowledged; please post all follow-ups to the newsgroup so all may benefit. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
what is the downside using Word's internal versioning feature?
See http://www.gmayor.com/save_numbered_versions.htm and keep a note of
which version you send in a separate document (or if sending by e-mail note the filename of the attachment). -- Graham Mayor - Word MVP My web site www.gmayor.com Word MVP web site http://word.mvps.org Lioncaller wrote: Well, I really liked this feature. As a poet, I might have 45 progressive/experimental versions of an 8-line poem, and I might have 5 of those versions out to 10 different poetry journals. Sometimes the differences are as small as an added comma. I never stop tinkering. Each journal can take 6-18 months to respond, so it's very likely that I'll have messed around with that poem before I hear back. If they accept it, they want the version they saw, not my revisions. So it's very useful to be able to call up the version I sent. And very, very messy to have 45 versions saved to my hard disk, one for each magazine sent to. And also to have a subfolder for each of my 95 (and counting) 1-10 page poems. Ditto my short stories and essays. I don't think SharePoint is a practical solution for this, because no matter where I put them, I just don't want a billion separate files. "Jay Freedman" wrote: On Mon, 5 Mar 2007 13:54:47 -0800, marilyn315 wrote: aside from bloating the file, what is the downside of using Word's internal versioning feature? and why would you use it? Its use has been one of the circumstances implicated in document corruption. Others include the Fast Saves feature and the practice of opening documents from removable media. (http://www.word.mvps.org/FAQs/AppErrors/CorruptDoc.htm) The Versions feature has been removed from Word 2007. The replacement is the use of SharePoint Services, or just keeping different versions in different files. In short, I wouldn't use it. -- Regards, Jay Freedman Microsoft Word MVP FAQ: http://word.mvps.org Email cannot be acknowledged; please post all follow-ups to the newsgroup so all may benefit. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
what is the downside using Word's internal versioning feature?
Or use the Comments field of the document Properties to record where a given
version has been sent. -- Suzanne S. Barnhill Microsoft MVP (Word) Words into Type Fairhope, Alabama USA http://word.mvps.org "Graham Mayor" wrote in message ... See http://www.gmayor.com/save_numbered_versions.htm and keep a note of which version you send in a separate document (or if sending by e-mail note the filename of the attachment). -- Graham Mayor - Word MVP My web site www.gmayor.com Word MVP web site http://word.mvps.org Lioncaller wrote: Well, I really liked this feature. As a poet, I might have 45 progressive/experimental versions of an 8-line poem, and I might have 5 of those versions out to 10 different poetry journals. Sometimes the differences are as small as an added comma. I never stop tinkering. Each journal can take 6-18 months to respond, so it's very likely that I'll have messed around with that poem before I hear back. If they accept it, they want the version they saw, not my revisions. So it's very useful to be able to call up the version I sent. And very, very messy to have 45 versions saved to my hard disk, one for each magazine sent to. And also to have a subfolder for each of my 95 (and counting) 1-10 page poems. Ditto my short stories and essays. I don't think SharePoint is a practical solution for this, because no matter where I put them, I just don't want a billion separate files. "Jay Freedman" wrote: On Mon, 5 Mar 2007 13:54:47 -0800, marilyn315 wrote: aside from bloating the file, what is the downside of using Word's internal versioning feature? and why would you use it? Its use has been one of the circumstances implicated in document corruption. Others include the Fast Saves feature and the practice of opening documents from removable media. (http://www.word.mvps.org/FAQs/AppErrors/CorruptDoc.htm) The Versions feature has been removed from Word 2007. The replacement is the use of SharePoint Services, or just keeping different versions in different files. In short, I wouldn't use it. -- Regards, Jay Freedman Microsoft Word MVP FAQ: http://word.mvps.org Email cannot be acknowledged; please post all follow-ups to the newsgroup so all may benefit. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|