View Single Post
  #2  
Old August 6th, 2009, 04:36 PM posted to microsoft.public.windows.inetexplorer.ie6_outlookexpress
Bruce Hagen
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 7,956
Default Old saw about e-mail: to scan or not to scan

QP
- One fixed price per user
/QP

There's your answer.
--

Bruce Hagen
MS-MVP [Mail]
Imperial Beach, CA


"Dori A Schmetterling" wrote in message
...
I am well aware of the majority expert opinion here about e-mail scanning:
DON'T.

(And I have switched mine off as a consequence.)

Today I received notice of a webcast on hosted e-mail, which includes
these
subjects:

QUOTE
Here are a few examples of what hosted email security provides you:

- One fixed price per user gives you unlimited email scanning capacity

- The solution is continuously tuned and updated by your security vendor

- Reduced overhead means lower costs for mail servers and network
bandwidth.
UNQUOTE


The sender is PC Magazine (USA), thus a respectable source. The sponsor
is
Trend Micro, so they have a vested interest...

Note the emphasis on "unlimited email scanning capacity."

Why would PC Mag waste its time? Or maybe somebody will suggest it is a
waste of time...

DAS
--
To send an e-mail directly replace "spam" with "schmetterling"
---