View Single Post
  #6  
Old June 6th, 2010, 02:11 AM posted to microsoft.public.access.forms
Bob Quintal
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 939
Default SubForm, or something Else?

=?Utf-8?B?Sk1heQ==?= wrote in
:

Currently in my Query I'm getting what is needed, but
unfortunately in my SubForm based on the query I'm getting:

Music, #NAME?
Music, #NAME?
Music, #NAME?
Music, #NAME?
Music, #NAME?
Children, #NAME?
Children, #NAME?
Children, #NAME?
Children, #NAME?
Children, #NAME?
Children, #NAME?
Children, #NAME?
Children, #NAME?
Children, #NAME?
Children, #NAME?

So Close, But YET so FAR from right!!!

The results you are getting is why anyone who has experience in
Access states loudly and firmly "DO NOT USE MULTI-VALUED FIELDS!"




"JMay" wrote:

Well, this is a MICROSOFT Forum so you'd think that somehow there
would be a few "adopters" of the Mystic Access Programmers
product. hummmm.

PS: you'r right I was a bit reluctant to try this, but I was
reluctant to try PC computers 30 years ago...

Thanks..

Any multivalue believers out there??

Jim

"Linq Adams via AccessMonster.com" wrote:

Larry's advice here is, indeed, reflective of the advice given
by evey experienced developer in Access that I know of! Your
statement

"I have Chosen (big Grin) to utilize the new Multivalued
fields"

indicates that you know this to be true and are simply ignoring
the accepted wisdom! Do you really expect anyone here to help
you in this foolish quest?

--
There's ALWAYS more than one way to skin a cat!

Answers/posts based on Access 2000/2003

Message posted via AccessMonster.com
http://www.accessmonster.com/Uwe/For...s-forms/201006
/1

.