Some of the most innovative software comes from 3rd party developers -
they might be the next "Microsoft"... If MS doesn't buy them out first.

Even if MS provided a less expensive sharing option without Exchange,
it's still going to cost you... For example, if you buy Windows 2003, you
can use the Windows Sharepoint services to share your calendar, but you'll
need to buy win2003 and you'll need a machine to run it on. Or if they
do add calendar sharing to Outlook right out of the box, it will only be
for the new version, more money out of your pocket.
Cheap alternates include MSN or Yahoo calendars. Both offer calendar sharing
with intellisync.Yahoo's is free, MSN is either $5 or 10 per month (premium
service).


On 23 Apr 2004 18:36, "=?Utf-8?B?Z2lnZ2xlcw==?="
wrote:
Please ask your company executives to remedy this situation. We pay a good
price for the software and feel it's unfair that we can't fully utilize it
without purchasing even more software -- from a different company at that.
Thank you!



--
Diane Poremsky [MVP - Outlook]
Author, Teach Yourself Outlook 2003 in 24 Hours
Coauthor, OneNote 2003 for Windows (Visual QuickStart Guide)
Author, Google and Other Search Engines (Visual QuickStart Guide)

Outlook Tips: http://www.outlook-tips.net/
Outlook & Exchange Solutions Center: http://www.slipstick.com

[Posted using NewsLook NNTP add-in for Outlook]