View Single Post
  #8  
Old June 13th, 2005, 05:44 AM
Duane Hookom
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I was mis-reading your query names as field names.
250 pieces of information about a single fund seems like a lot. If there
were multiple fields for "dates" than I would consider this un-normalized.
Since I don't know how all or your fields are used, it is just a guess that
your tables might be un-normalized.

--
Duane Hookom
MS Access MVP


"PZ Straube" wrote in message
...
Duane,

Thanks for your response. I appreciate you taking the time to help me.

Please forgive my ignorance but I'm not sure what you mean by "storing
data
values in field names".

Regarding "un-normalized tables", thanks for mentioning that to me because
now that I'm really getting into Access, I better be thinking of that
constantly or things will be even more difficult. I have tables
containing
data on thousands of mutual funds (I'm a consultant to corporate
retirement
plans). Each quarter, I obtain updated data and it goes into a new table.
In each table, each record pertains to one specific mutual fund and there
are
aboout 250 unique pieces of data for each mutual fund (e.g., rate of
return,
risk, style, market capm etc.). My queries will pick up data from the
current quarter's table plus one or more of the prior quaterly tables then
do
some calculations related to the scoring for each fund.

For reasons I won't bore you with, I have three queries that do
calculations
with the last one feeding my reports. I think my problem might be that the
last query contains a ton of calculations plus data directly from the main
table that I hit the limit. I have now put a fourth query in place using
only the calculations used in the reports and everything is fine. Sorry
to
have bothered you with something I should have figured out on my own
before
posting it.

"Duane Hookom" wrote:

I believe your basic issue is un-normalized tables. It looks like you are
storing data values in field names. This causes too many fields.

You may be able to work around this by using subreports for some of your
tables/fields.

--
Duane Hookom
MS Access MVP
--

"PZ Straube" wrote in message
...
Hello,

For a report I have in Access 2003, I have apparently tried to have too
many
fields in the single query that feeds it data and received error
message
3190
when running this query. I took the new data fields I tried to add to
the
original query and put them in a second query. Because I'm a novice
and
haven't had two sources of data for a single report, I went to the
Report
Wizard to play around with this before modifying my existing report.
In
the
Report Wizard, I see that when I get to the point of selecting fields,
I
can
change the query or table to be used, thus allowing for multiple
sources
of
data. However, when I tried to have data from more than one source, I
received the following message:

"You have chosen fields from record sources which the wizard can't
connect.
You may have choosen fields from a table and from a query based on
that
table. If so, try choosing fields from only the table or only the
query."

Here's where I'm at. I am trying to get data from two queries:
Filter_3_part_1 and Filter_3_part_2. Both rely on data from the same
query,
Filter_2 (which, via Query Filter_1, uses data from the a single table
called
Main_Data). Both of the Filter_3 queries have the same primary key
field
from table Main_Data.

I need to figure out what I am doing wrong so I can use data from these
two
queries in my report but I don't know where to start.

Thanks to anyone can point me in the right direction.