On Fri, 21 Sep 2007 18:54:00 -0400, Tom wrote:

No, it was not in the correct order. It was in groups or patterns of
numbers.


On Fri, 21 Sep 2007 06:06:52 -0400, Chuck wrote:

On Thu, 20 Sep 2007 09:18:03 -0400, Tom wrote:

Marsh,

In case you missed my reply, I posted the sort table on 9/15/2007 to your
attention.

Thx for your help.

Tom

Is the sort table you posted, sorted the way you want after a sort?

Chuck

Are some of the wildly different part numbers, interchangeable parts?
If yes, there is no way to sort them in any useful manner with the data you
have shown us show.

Are the part numbers from different organizations?
If yes, there is no way to sort them in any useful manner with the data you
have shown us show.

In your post of 7/2/2007, you said you had an unbreakable UDF. Is it still
unbreakable?
If no, why not?

Chuck